Lig.,,{},].,2
tOT",'.'.2i.gli.S.tE".eft"A'l}f"Nd.F,o,",7t'J".c.tLo.",?n,g,kn,eering
z",R,,ee##mk'Lm,as,lfft{L=$,
DAMAGE
MECHANISMS
AND
MECHANICAL
BEHAVIOUR
OF
CONCRETE
UNDER
CYCLIC
LOADS
by
HIROZO
MIHASHI"
and
MASANORI
IZUMI",
Members
of
A.
I.
J.
lntroductjon
Concrete
is
undoubtedly one ofthe
cemmonest and mostimportant
structuralmaterials.
In
spite
of
ahuge
amount of effortto
studyits
strengthproperties,
the
fracture
process
andthe
mechanism of nonlinearbehavieur
under cyclicloads
arefar
from
being
asfully
understood asthose
fer
metalsand
polymers
(Yoshimoto,
Ogino
andKawakami,
1972;Stroven,
1979;Weigler
andKlausen,
1979).
Unfortunately
it
is
hardly
possible
to
observedirectly
the
cracking
inside
of
concrete
materials underloads,
sofar.
Since
concrete
is
abrittle
material witha
veryheterogeneous
microstructure,the
mechanicalpToperties
are
quite
different
from
those
of metallic mateTials.Moreover,
the
mechanicalbehaviourhighly
depends
onthe
experimental cendition such asthe
type
ofloacling,
the
temperature,
the
humidity
and so on.Although
many researchershave
studiedthe
dynamic
fatigue
of
concrete
materials, most ofthern
use experimental approachestb
know
the
widely scattered relationbetween
the
maximumloacl
andthe
fatigue
life.
Recently
the
results of some experimental studiespresented
the
deformation
properties
of
concrete
materials under cyclicloads
(Sparks
and
Menzies,
1973
;
Tokumitsu
andMatsushita,
1979
;
Cornelissen
and
Timrners,
1981).
They
pointed
outthat
there
was a strong relation
between
the
fatigue
life
andstrain
rate,Moreover
Cornelissen
andTimmers
carried outthe
fatigue
test
undertension-compression
cyclicloads.
It
mightbe
one ofthe
mostimportant
findings
in
their
workthat
the
slope ofthe
relatienbetween
lnN
andln
o
in
the
case oftension-compression
cyclicloads
is
about
twice
steeper
than
that
in
the
case
of
tension-tension
cyclicloads
;
whereIV
is
the
mean value offatigue
life
ando
is
the
ratio ofthe
maximum stress
to
the
strength,
The
micromechanismof
fatigue
damage
anddeformation,
however,
is
still ambigousand
there
are nogenerally
acceptedtheoretical
modelsto
describe
such a comprehensivebehaviour.
In
order
to
predict
the
mechanicalbehaviour
and
the
life
time
of
concrete
structure under cyclicloads,
sometheoretical
model
based
on
the
fundamental
properties
of
the
rnaterial shouldbe
developed.
Recently,
the
authors
have
presented
a stochastictheory
for
the
fatigue
of concrete(Mihashi
andWittmann,
1980
;
Mihashi
andIzumi,
1980),
The
non-fractuTeprobability
P(N)
andthe
fatigue
life
N
weregiven
by
eq.(
1
)
and
eq.{2) respectively,P{N)=exp(-AafiN)-・--・・--・-・・・・・・---・・・・・・・-・・・・・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・-・・-・・-・・・・・・'-''-・・・・・・・・・-・・-・・-・・--・・・・・・・-・-・・・(1)
iKi'`=Al.n"''''"''-''"''"''"''''''''''''''''-''''-'-'''''''''''''''''''''-''''''''''''''m-'''''''''''''"''-'-''''-'''-''''(2)
These
theoretical
results werein
good
agreement withpublisheddata.
They
have
also analyzedthe
experimental resultsof
Cornelissen
andTimmers
by
meansof
fracture
mechanics anddiscussed
the
mechanism offatigue
process
(Mihashi
andIzumi,
l984).
The
purpose
ofthis
paper
is
to
present
antheoretical
medelto
link
the
probable
mechanism of
fatigue
processes
of concreteto
the
macroscopicbehaviour
undeTcyclic
loads.
Probable
Mechanism
of
Fatigue
Proeess
Since
concreteis
a
brittle
material withthe
extremelyheterogeneous
structure,the
fractu[e
andfatigue
properties
aredominated
by
the
internal
structure.The
fatigue
process
maybe
subdividedinte
three
stages
asfollows:1).
i
Ecole
Pelytechnique
Federal
de
Lausanne,
Labo.
Mat.
Construction,
Chemin
de
Bellerive
32,
CH-loo7
Lausanne,
Switzerland,
--
Tohoku
University,
Dept,
ofArchitecture,
Sendai
980,
Manuscript
receivedApril
l,
1985
Crack
initiation
aroundlarger
aggregates,being
arrestedby
the
neighbouring aggregates;
2).
Damage
accumulationin
the
matrix andinterfaces
;3),
Unstable
crack extensionto
causefracture.
The
first
stage
is
constituted
by
the
following
mechanism,
Stress
is
hightly
concentrated
in
the
vicinityof
the
aggregates
and
there
is
a
porous
and
weak system onthe
interface.
Accordingly
cracksinitiate
even under alow
stress.However,
these
cracksimmediately
come
across
ottier
aggregates
and
are arrestedby
them
because
ofhigh
toughness
of aggregates(Fig.1).
On
the
otherhand,
the
matrix systemis
a comparativelyhomogeneous
solidbut
akind
of composite materialsincluding
micropores.Therefore
the
damage
of
the
systemis
successively accumulated under a cyclicload.
The
mechanism ofthe
damage
was studiedexperimentally
by
Yoshimoto
andhis
co-workers(197Z).
According
to
his
study,the
damage
maybe
due
to
the
accumulation of microcracks(boid-cracks)
in
the
paste,
AfteJ
a certain amount ofthe
accumulation ofdamage,
the
fracture
toughness
ofthe
matrix maybe
decreased.
As
the
result ofthat,
thg
arrested cracks willbe
extended and mutually connected.In
other words,the
speimen
may
be
fractured
whenthe
damage
onthe
second stageis
aceumulatedenough
to
allow arrested cracksto
propagate
in
an unstable manner.Therefore
the
fatigue
life
may
be
closely relatedto
the
rate ofthe
damage
accumulation,In
the
case oftension-compression
cyclicloads,
the
possibility
to
transient
into
the
third
stage maybe
increased.
Because
the
vicinity of crack
tips
arethrust
in
the
Mode
]
andMode
M
under
compressive
loads
and
verticalbond
cracks are also createdlinking
the
horizo'ntal
tensile
cracks.
Deformation
due
,to
Crack
lnitiation
atthe
First
Stage
It
is
supposedthat
the
increase
ofdeformation
in
stage1
is
due
to
the
accumulation of mesocracking whichtakes
place
in
successionfrom
the
weakest region such asinterfaces.
According
to
the
elementsof
Linear
Fracture
Mechanics,
the
deformation
in
the
y
direction
onthe
point
P(x,
y>
<Fig.
2)
is
given
by
eq.(
3
)
in
the
case
of
plane
straln.
'v==
2K6
vlZIJ
sinl(x+i-2
cosg)・--・--・-・---・-・--・-・・-・--・---・-・---・-(3)
where x
is
equalto
(3-4
v) andG
is.
the
stiear modutus.The
displacernent
on
the
center
of
the
crack
surface
:
T
is
t
t
obtained
from
eq.<3) asfollows:
le(1-v}
ac・--t---・---L-・-・---・---(4)
T=
±
G
The
straindue
to
a single crackinitiation
maybe
clescribed
by
eq.(
s
).
2Vi}'(1-.)
'
・
qc-・---k-""""'-H--"H"H"H"'"-"""""H'"'""'"'
5
eo=
aG
S[HEmaTI[
DESCRIPTION
OF
FAILURE
PROCESS
accuttu1
O
,
ef dama brtgewh.S1iS
V
eggr stress stressTENSILE
FRACTURE
cpeckO
ttt..t
o'
stress:,r:::t.,.
<
er
ka;
vi
wG4i
:
astress
eecumuletionfd ghts,
kii
,: i'b sttess
COMPRESSIVE
FRACTVRE
D'i"i'''
・=
,,・ostressFig.
1
Schernatic
Description
ofPTobable
Mechanlsm
ofFatigue
Process
ofConcrete.
.-tttttttt-tttt-tttttt-t-tt-t-(
)
where
a
is
the
distance
between
markedpoints.
Since
the
strain
is
causedby
cracking,the
increasing
rate of
the
strain maybe
proportional
to
the
probabitity
of
the
crackinitiati6n
:
Lafi
(Mihashi
andWittmann,
1980);L
is
aparameter
ofthe
internal
structure and environmentalconditions.
Moreover,
the
magnitude ofthe
strain maybe
controledby
the
number
of
cracks
and
a
fi
y
P
{x,y)
'
V
re
xo
v
---
2c
-y
U
a
Crack.-III-their
length.
The
number ofcrack
initiation
maybe
dependent
on
the
non-fracture
probability
whichdecreases
asthe
number
of
loading
cycles:IVinereases.
From
the
consideration mentioned above,the
following
equations are obtained.Ei==eoLtafiexp(-AiafiN)・-・-・・-・・・・・・・--・・・-・・・-・・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・・・・-・-・・・・・-r・・・--・-・t・・・・-・・・-・・--・-・・・・・-・・・・・-・・・-(6>
Ei=E;lll'n-exp{-Aia"N}・・・・・・・-・・・-・-・・・-・--・・・・・・・・・・-・・・-・・・・・・・-''・・・・--'H''''''H''H''H''H''-H'・-''-''"(7>
Deformation
Due
to
Damage
Accumulation
at
the
Second
Stage
After
most of weaker regionshighly
concentrated with stress releasethe
strain energyby
cracking,the
damage
accumulationprocess
maybecomedominant.
The
strain rateef
the
damage
accumulationprocess
may
be
supposedto
be
given
by
eq.(8).Et=hoills''''''-'''-'--''''''-'''''''"'''"'-'''--'''''''-'''H''-'''''''''H''''''H'''''''H''"''''''"'''''''''''H''-'''H'(8)
where
h,
is
a material censtant,i
is
the
mean value ofthe
strainincrease
per
oneloading
cycle and#.
is
the
probability
to
causethe
strainincrease
per
oneloading
cycle.Since
the
strainincrease'
is
due
to
microcracking(boid-crack)
(Yoshimoto
et al.,1972),
the
strain-increase-probability maybe
proportional
to
the
micro-crack-initiatien-probability,
Provided
microcrackingis
akind
of rateprocess
dependent
on stress, eq.<
g
)
is
obtained(YokoborL
l974;Mihashi
and
Wittmann,
1980).
p.oc
".
:LzaS'"'''-''-'-'''-'-"'"-''-''"'''--,.-,--,,H,・,.,.,-,,.,.,,-,,"''",.-.'--,,.,.,.,,,.,--,,-.,--,.,(
9
)
where
",
meansthe
microcrack-initiation-probability under stress a;eis
a material constant affectedby
the
temperature
andthe
humidity,
and ais
the
maximum stress.Substituting
eq.
(
9
)
into
eq.
(
8
),
the
following
equation
are obtained.E,=h,iL,ae・・-・・・・・・・・・・----・・-・・-・・-・--・・-・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・・・・・・・-・--・・・-・・t・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・-・・-・・・・-・・・・(lo)
et=koiLta"N"''''''""''"''-'''''''''''"'''-''"''''''t・-'・-・・'・・・・・-・・・・・・・・・・・・・・-・'・・'・・-・・-・・-・--・・・-・・-・--・-・(11)
Defermation
due
te
Unstabte
Crack
Propagation
Since
the
matrix
and
interfaces
are
damaged
with
the
accumulation
of
microcracks,
the
fracture
toughness
of
the
system may
be
decreased
after
the
second
stage.
According
to
fracture
mechanics,the
catastrophic
fracture
occurs
when
the
fracture
mechanicalpararneter
such
as
the
fracture
toughness
reachesa
certain
critical
value,Since
the
stabil'ity of crack
propagation
is
proportional
to
the
remainedteughne$s
Qfthe
system,the
probability
for
the
systemto
reachthe
critical
condition
may
be
in
inverse
proportion
to
the
survival
probability
atthe
secend
stage.
Supposing
that
the
unstable cracklength
is
proportional
to
the
kth
power
ofN,
the
following
equations are obtained.2
V2(1
-
.*)e3=
dG
aVMexp(Asa"N)=kiblVitexp(Aia"N)・-・・-・・・・・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・-・"・・・・・・・・・-・・・・・・C12)e,=2V2i'
IG-
"') ai(A,a"lv
lt+hN h")exp(A,a"lv}-・-・・・-・''H''---'''-'''H''-''''''''H'--'''-'''''''-''H'-'--'H-''(13)
=hia(AsaSNk+hNk'i}exp(A,aSN)
Discussion
Since
the
strain rate and strain under cyclicloads
are obtained asthe
summation ofthose
onthree
stages,the
following
equations are ebtained.i:Il++Eii++ee'
,S+e.,l'
''"'''
''"
''''-'''''
'''''-''-''
'''''H'''''-'''''''''''''-
'''H
'''''''
''
(14)
where s.t means
the
elastic strain underthe
maximum stress.The
fatigue
life
undercyclic
loads
is
relatedto
the
maximum stresslevel
asfollows
from
eq.(2).
InN=-filnn+consL-・・・-・・・・・・・--・・・-・・・-・・・--・--・-・-・・-・・・-・・-・--・・・・・・-・-・・・・・・--・・-・・・-・-・・・-・・-・・・--・--・・(15)
On
the
otherhand,
eq,(10)is
rewritten asfollows:
ln
Et=ln
AelAN
=Bln
ij+consL
・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・-・・-・・・-・・・-・・・・-・・・-・・・-・・・-・・・・・・・--・-・・・・・・・・-・・-・・・・・・--・--・・・(16)
The
valuesof
fi
calculated
from
the
experimental
results
by
Cornelissen
and
Timmers
are
as
follows
(Mihashi
and
Izumi,
1984):
fi=IZ.9
for
wet conditionfi=11.2
for
dry
condition
-112-e:e:l40
120w:.100・:
80se
60:'E
4oa
2o
10xmicrostrain
rnicrestrain--
e. E:l40
120-XIOOtr.Edi
soLes2
6oo='E
40ben
20
O
O.2
O.4
.
0.6
・
O.S
1.0
Nermalized
Cyclic
Number
:NXN
(a)
Influence
of theHllmidity.
Fig.3
Theoretical
Re$ults
'
These
values arequite
closeto
those
obtainedfrom
aFig,3:
shows,some examples ofthe
theoretically
mentioneddifferent
values ofB
for
the
di
fatigue
deformation
properties
is
representedin
Fig.3<a).
It
ef10xmicrostrain
microstarinO
O.2
O.4
Normal,ized
(b)
Influence
Fatigue
Process,
cyeli'cof
theO.6
O.8
Number
:N/N
Stress
Levet.
LO
completely
different
test
(Mihashi
andWittmann,
1980),
simulated results according
to
eq.(14), usingthe
abovefferent
environmental
conditions.The
influence
ofthe'
humidity
on
the
is
simulatedthat
the
shape efthe
deformation
eurves seemsto
be
almost
samebut
the
wetcondition
causes alarger
deformation
than
the
dTy
conditionfor
the
same stresslevel
:
o.
The
influence
ofthe
stresslevel
enthe
fatigue
deformation
properties
canbe
alsodescribed
by
this
model as shownin
Fig.3(b),
It
is
well simuiatedthat
alarger
stresslevel
gives
alhrger
deformation
though
the
wholefatigue
deformation
prQperties
are not so muchchanged
in
this
calculated
range.
These
theoretical
predictiens
are
in
good
agreement withthe
experimentaldata
published
by
Cornelissen
andTimmers
(1981)
as
shown
in
Fig.
4.
It
means
that
the
present
theoretical
modelbased
onthe
probable
mechanism canpredict
reasonablythe
mechanicalbehaviour
of concrete under cyclicioad$.
The
corresponding strain rates calculatedby
eq.
<14)
are alsoshown
in
Fig.
3.
These
changingprocesses
of strain rates are veryimportant
to
rnonitorthe
safety ofthe
system
because
the
final
fatigue
life
is
dominated
by
the
unstable crackpropagation
through
the
system.According
te
these
theoretical
predictions,
the
changingbehavieur
Qf
the
strain rate atthe
final
stage ef wet specimen
is
not so much sensitive asmicrostrain ILO
120
10080
='E
3
fio
en to ruo
Fig.4
al
a2,
ol
oAos
Noumalized・
Cyclic
Fatigue
Property
afterTimmersl}
ofi
e,7
o,s
os
to
Number
: NXNCornellssen
andv-Lrv,-vU-aec=.zaben
logL,esec
-5
-6
-7
-E
-9
-IO
-11
Fig.5
(E
per
second)presenttheory
'
sN1sl)
empiricalformula ]1odrying Nstensien-tensionosealed
tension-compressionAdrying
hLxO
l
234
56
7
logi,N
Fntigue'Life
Relation
between
theStraia
Rale
atthe
Second
Stag'e
andFatigueLife
[ExperimeEtal
Results
were obtainedby
that
ofdry
specimens.The
behaviour
ona
low
stresslevel
is
alsonot
sensitive
in
comparison
withthat
on
ahigh
stresslevel.
Therefore
the
target
to
be
controlledshould
be
verycarefully
fixed
whenthe
systemis
monitoredby
the
unsensitive
parametet
Comparing
eq.
{15)
witheq.
(16),
the
following
relationis
obtained.InNoc-lnet-・---・・---・--・---・・----・---・---・---<17)
that
is
N=ipl,-i・・-・・-・・・-・・・・・・・--・・・-・・-・・--・-・・・・-・・・-・・-・・-・・・・-・・・-・・・-・・--・・・-・・・-・・・-・・・-・・・・・・・-・・-・・・--・-・・・-・・・・・--・・(18)
where
e
is
arnaterial constant.Therefore
it
is
expectedto
estimatethe
fatigue
life
by
monitoringthe
strain rate atthe
second stage.
The
comparison of eq.(17)
withthe
experimental resultsby
Cornelissen
andTimmers
is
shownin
Fig.s
and one canfind
the
geod
agreement,This
tendency
was alsopresented
for
the
compressivefatigue
test
by
Sparks
andMenzies
(1973).
Concluding
Remarks
In
orderto
investigate
the
mechanismof
the
nonlinear mechanicalbehaviour
of concrete under cyclicloads,
the
fatigue
process
should
be
subdivided
into
three
stages.
At
the
first
stage,the
strain energy accumulatedby
the
locally
concentrated stress aroundfatal
materialdefects
such aslarger
aggregates and shrinkage cracksis
easily releasedby
rnesocracking.However,
these
cracks arearrested
by
otheraggregates
or withthe
change
ofthe
stressfield
atthe
cracktip.
The
crackinitiation
process
occurs successivelythroughout
the
specimen and continues untilthe
saturated stable condition,The
strainis
widely scatteredbecause
the
crackinitiation
and arrestprocess
is
highly
influenced
by
the
geometric
properties
and arrangementof
aggregates.
Undoutedly
it
is
necessaryto
study
theoretically
the
crackingprocess
atthe
first
stageby
means of computer simulationin
a random media with compesite structures.At
the
second stage, microcracks(boid-cracks)
initiate
in
the
rnatrixbecau$e
ofthe
heterogeneity
in
the
matrix
itself.
Since
these
cracks aregradually
accumulatedin
the
matrix.the
fatigue
proeess
atthe
secondstage
maybe
supposed
to
be
akind
of rateprocess
dependent
on stress.Therefore
the
strain
rate maybe
preportional
to
L,afi.
The
fatigue
process
atthe
third
stage maybe
due
to
the
extension of a critical crack whichlinks
mesocracks occurred onthe
first
stage.Since
the
stressintensity
factor
increases
withthe
crack extension,the
most critical crackextension
maydominate
the
rnechanicalbehaviour.
Since
the
fatigue
life
maybe
in
inverse
proportion
to
the
strain rate ofthe
second stage,it
willbe
possible
to
predict
the
fatigue
life
by
monitoringthe
strain rate atthe
second stage.Acknowledgement
The
authors are verygrateful
to
Dr,
Cornelissen
atDelft
University
ofTechnology
in
the
Netherlands
for
offering
the
results ofhis
experimental research aboutthe
fatigue
ofplain
concrete.Reterences
1)
CoTnelis$en,
H.A.W.
andG.
Timmers.
{1981),
Fatigue
ofPLain
Concrete
in
Uniaxial
Tension
andin
Alternating
Tensien-Cornpression
Experiment
andResults,
Stevin
Report
5-81-7,
Detfle
Uhitersity
of
7lechnoftrg),,
Dqpt,
of
Cien'l
Engineering;
7VLe
Nbtherlands.
2)
Mihashi,
H.
andM.
Izumi.
"980).
A
Stochastic
Theory
ferFatigue
FTacture
ofConcTete,
Thansactiens
of
the.rtipanConcrete
lhstitute,
Z,
203-210.
・
3)
Mihashi,
H.
andF.
H.
Wittmann.
(19so).
Stochastlc
Approach
toStudy
theInfluence
ofRate
ofLoading
onStrength
ofConcrete,
fferon,
zs,
3
4)
Miha$hi,
H.
andM.
Izurni.
(1984).
Deformation
andFracture
ofConcrete
underCyclic
Loads,
Theeretical
andApPlial
haha,iies,
Edt.
by
Japan
National
Committee
for
Theoretical
andApplied
Mechanics
ScienCe
Council
ofJapan,University
ofTokyo
Press,
445-452.
5)
Sparks.
P.R.
andJ.B.
Menzies,
(]973}.
The
Effect
ofRate
ofLoading
upenthe
Static
andFatigue
Strengtli
ofPlain
Concrete
in
Compressien,
Mlag
of
Cbncrete
Research
25,
83,
73-80.
6)
Stroven,
P.,
(1979).
Microeracking
in
Cencrete
Subjected
toFatigue
Loading,
Ptec,
77}ird
int.
CbnfZ
onndechandeal
Behambur
of
Materials,
Cantbridge,
Englanct
3,
141-150.
7)
Tokifmitsu,
Y.
andH.Mats"shita.
(1979).
Fatigue
Strength
ofPlainConcrete
underRepeatedLeading,
thncTeteJburnal,
17,
6,
13-ZZ,
(in
Japanese).
8)
Weigler,
H.
andD,
Klausen,
(1979).
Fatigue
Behaviour
ofConcrete--Effect
efLoading
in
the
Fatigrte
Strength
Range,
BETOATZVZERK+EERTTGI:ELL-TECEUVIK,
4,
214-z2o.
9)
Yokoberi.
T.
{1974),
An
intercEsciplinary
Apmaach
teFVzrcture
andStrength
of
bolids,
Iwanarni
Book
Co.,
Cin
Japanese)
lo)
Yoshimoto,
A.
,S.
Ogino
andM.
Kawakami.
(1972).
Microcracking
Effect
onFlexural
Strength
ofConcrete
Aftei
Repeated
Loading,
Jbu,mal
ofAmen'can
Concrete
institute,
69,
233-240.
'
Appendix
The
foMowing
notations are usedin
the
present
paper.
A
:
Parameter
todescribe
the environmental condition and alFothe
frequency
ofthe
cyclicload
(see
Mihashi
andWittmann,
・
1980).
Ai,AhA3:the
value ofAat theith
stage.・
a:distance
between
markedpeints,
2c:craek
length.
2i
:
the
initial
yalue ofthe
.equivalent
cracklength
in
the cTitical condition.G:shearing
modulus.'
Ki:stress
intensity
factor.
h,ko,ki:material,constants.
・
・
L
:parameter
of theinternal
structure ofthe
specimen andthe
environrnental conditien,L,.L,
:
the
value ofL
atthe
ith
stage.'
N:nu'rnber
ofloading
cycles.1if:the
expectedfatigue
life,
i.e,
the mean value ofthe
numbeT of]oading
cycleste
collapsethe
specimen.AN:increment
ofthe
cyclic number ofthe
toad.
P(N):non-fracture
probability.
i.e.
theprobability
that
the specimen stiilsuivives afte[N
cycles of thelotid.
v:displacement
in
they
direction
on a certainpoint
(x,
y)
around a crack.
T:displaeement
onthe
center efthe
crack surface.P
:
material constant as afunctien
ofthe
enyironmentaltemperature
andhurnidity.
i:the
rnean value of the stram incrementper
eneloading
cycLe atthe
second stage(damage
accllmulationprocess).
ee
:
stra・indue
to
a single crackinitiation.
et,ei,es:strain
due
te
the
mechanism atthe
ith
stage.'
e,.EhE
:
strain ratedue
to the mecltanism atthe
ith
stage. e.i:
elastic strain under the maximum stress.
Ae
:
stlainincrement.
n:ratio
ofthe
maxirnurn stress to the strength.k
:
material constant(=3-4
v}#.
:
probability
of microcrackinitiation.
".:probability
te
cau$ethe
strainincrease
per
oneloading
cycle,v