チェビシェフ展開係数を用いたスツルム算法による実代数方程式の実根の分離
全文
(2) Vol.2009-HPC-122 No.4 2009/10/9. ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲ IPSJ SIG Technical Report. N ߫㋲ߗߦⲺㄤߨⳇᓻㄤ߮ࢸᝪߌ O(N ) ߫ߪࠋ㡺ߗߋߗ㡸ᮀࠁߟ߄ᡏਓ߮ৼ r. ጟ߮ਓࠒᮀࠁࠋߓߨ߯㡸࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ߮ࢧ㑦ᴭటጟ߫༒ߥߏ㡴ౕ㑦ጟ߮༴ೋ߮ Horner. ߌ㏸ኔ߫ߏߪࠋߨ㡸ⳇᓻㄤߌ r ߫ᭉতߗߦཫߗ㡸Ⲻㄤࠂ O(r) ৼ߮ࡔࠪࡃࡦ߮ↇ. ᯜߨ㒥१߮㡵Clenshaw ߮ᯜ㡴 1㡵ࠒ⁌߄ߦⲺㄤ O(N ) ߧߧߍࠋ㡺ߓ߮Ⲻߧᮀࠁ. ईటߪߩ߫ࠈࠊ㡸Ⲻㄤߌ O(r 2 N ) ߮んୡߌુ⺉ߗߦ㡸㎯ߌ⁄ߘࠋ㡺. ߟ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮Ⱳᮀߕࠌߟୡᷲߧ߮ਓ㡸ߝ߮⏵ೄߋࠉ⏵ೄྰటࠒᮡᄓߗߦ࠴ࡦ࡛߮ᄓᾤ ࠒぃ⁌ߙࠋ㡺. 2. ϬϷОГΤᮈΡξρᓴΤጠ;ҊΈ N 㑦ጟ F (x) ߫ᅟߗ㡸F0 =F (x) ߨ F ߮ᅭ㋲ F1 =F (x) ߋࠉဲࠁߦ㡸ॿ߮⏵ೄ. qN+2 := 0 ; qN+1 := 0 ;. ࠒಟ⽋ߗߟ㑦ጟ߮୭ Fk = − remainder(Fk−2 , Fk−1 ) ࠒংࠊ㡸㎸㑦ጟ߫ߪࠋↇ߾ߧ. for j := N step −1 until 1 do qj := 2 * x * qj+1 − qj+2 + fj od ;. ߮㑦ጟ߮୭ {F0 , F1 , . . . , FM } ࠒ F ߮࠴ࡦ࡛୭ߨ߄߆㡺M ≤N ߧ߂ࠋ㡺FM ߯⏵ೄࠒ. q0 := x * q1 − q2 + f0 ;. ㍒ߑ߰ GCDx (F (x), F (x)) ߫␎ߗ߄㡺⏵ೄྰట V (x) ߯㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮ x ߫ᝫߑࠋਓ. return q0. {F0 (x), F1 (x), . . . , FM (x)} ࠒ㡸ਓ 0 ࠒ߄ߦባߋࠉ㑧߫ⱹߦ߄ߏߨߍ߮⏵ೄ߮ྰట߮ߧ. 1. ߂ࠋ㡺ߝ߮ߨߍఽ㋨ ( α, β ] ߧ߮ F (x) ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼ߯㡴ㄢᤐ߯ 1 ৼߨ߈ߦ㡵V (α) − V (β). Clenshaw ߮ᯜ. ߧࢬ߈ࠉࠌࠋ㡺ߓࠌ߫ࠈࠊ౾ᾤࢨ߯ఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼߌᮀ߾ࠋ㡺७ߗఽ㋨߮⏗ᷲ x=α ߌ. F (x) ߮ k ㄢᤐ (k > 1) ߮༴ೋ߯㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒ (x − α)k−1 ߧ߫தߣߦߋࠉ V (α) ࠒᮀࠁ. 3.3 ⻖ጠΤϴϚІϪϚЈൾ⻅֫ጠ. ࠋ㡺x=β ߮༴ೋࠂ᨟ߨߙࠋ㡴α ࠄ β ߌㄢᤐߧߪߑࠌ߰㡸ߓߓ߮ᯪᒊ߯ࢫⱲߧ߂ࠋ㡵㡺ఽ. ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ Tk (x) ߮ᅭ㋲߯ kUk−1 (x)㡸७ߗ U (x) ߯ ߮⏻ࣵ⍕࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢ. ㋨◹ᅮᯜࠒ⁌߄ࠋߨᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮ࠄ⿏१⓸ዕࠒ㗀ࠁࠋߓߨߌߧߍࠋ㡴ಗ⛊ᝈἤ4) 㡵㡺. ࡐ㑦ጟߧ߂ࠋ㡺㋲ጟ Uk (x) ≡ 2Tk (x) + Uk−2 (x)㡸U1 (x) ≡ 2T1 (x)㡸U0 (x) ≡ T0 (x) ࠒ⁌߄ࠋߨ5) 㡸⏻ࣵ⍕࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ߫ࠈࠋᆛ㋡߯ᄬឦ߫㡴⏻࢟⍕㡵࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦. 3. ϴϚІϪϚЈお༃. ጟ߫ࠈࠋᆛ㋡߸ྰᙘߧߍࠋ㡺ᆛ㋡ fk 㡸k=0, . . ., N ࠒᗏߤ N 㑦ጟ F (x) ߮ᅭ㋲. G(x) = F (x) ߮ gk 㡸k=0, . . ., N −1 ߯㡸 2 ߮ᯜߧⲺߧߍࠋ㡺. ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ߯㋲߮ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ߧ߮࢟᨟⿏१߫ᡊࠂ୵ߪↇई㑦ጟߧ߂ࠋ㡺k ߮㑦ጟ Tk (x) ߯ࢧ㑦ᴭటጟ T0 (x)=1㡸T1 (x)=x㡸Tk+1 (x)=2xTk (x) − Tk−1 (x) ߫ࠈࠊ ⁄ᔴߕࠌ㡸ࢧⲜ㋲ߨ Tk (cos θ)= cos(kθ) ߧ㋲ߗߦ߄ࠋ. 5),19). 3.4 ϴϚІϪϚЈൾ⻅Ρξρお༃Τޅա⢞† m 㑦ጟ A(x) ࠒ n 㑦ጟ B(x) ߧ㍒ࠒߗߟॿࠒ R(x) ߨߙࠋ㡺A(x)㡸B(x) ߮. 㡺. 3.1 ϴϚІϪϚЈൾ⻅. ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐᆛ㋡߮ニ୭ࠒ a(0:m)㡸b(0:n) ߨߗ㡸㗀(ޢn−1) ߮ॿ㑦ጟ R(x) ߮. N ᄗ㑦ጟ P (t) ߮ᄗᤐࠒᮀࠁߟ߄ t ߮ఽ㋨ [a, b] ࠒ x ߮ᩃ᳒ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ߫ྰ߮࢟. ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐᆛ㋡߯ニ୭ a(0:n-1) ߮んୡ߫ㄢ߭ᡂߍߙࠋࠂ߮ߨߙࠋ㡺╗⎻㍒ᯜ߫ࠈࠋ. ྰᙘߧᅟᎸߕߛߟࠂ߮ࠒ F (x)=P (t) ߨߙࠋ㡺x ߮ N 㑦ጟ F (x) ࠒᩃ᳒ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ଁ. த߯㡸࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ߮⍯߮ጟ Tm (x)·Tn (x) = (1/2)(Tm+n (x) + T|m−n| (x)) ߫ࠈ. ߧ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ Tk (x) ߧᆛ㋡ߙࠋ:F (x)=. f T (x)=f0 T0 (x) + f1 T1 (x) + · · · + k=0 k k. 㡴ᯪ: ⳇ ࠊ㡸ংニ୭ h(0:m) ࠒ⁌߄ࠌ߰㡴Fortran90 㒥१߮ⳇᯜߧ㡵 3 ߮ࠈ߆߫ᡂߑࠋ㡺. fN TN (x)㡺㑦ጟ߮ (N + 1) ৼ߮ぎᷲ x = − cos{( − 1/2)π/(N + 1)}㡸=0, . . ., N ߫ᝫ. ᓻㄤࠒஉߙࠋ༴ೋ߫߯ংニ୭ࠒচࠏߪ߄߆ߌ⡁߄㡺 㡵࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒংࠋ༴ೋ߮ॿⲺ. N. ߑࠋਓ F (x ) ߋࠉ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ fk ࠒᮀࠁࠋᛕংಜ߳ߝ߮⿴ᛕং߮Ⲻㄤ߯㡸ౕ┲ߪᝪ ᯜߧ߯ O(N 2 ) ߠߌ㡸⡁ߏ∐ࠉࠌߦ߄ࠋࠈ߆߫㗀〈㎮࠰ࠟྰᙘ㡴FDCT㡵ࠒ⁌߄ࠋߨ. for k := 1 to N do gk−1 := k * fk od ;. O(N log N ) ߫ߧߍࠋ15) 18) 㡺ळࢩߧ߯㑦ጟ߯ᡊ୯ߋࠉ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐᆛ㋡߮߫ࠈࠊࢬ. for k := N −1 step −1 until 2 do gk−2 := gk−2 + gk ; gk := 2 * gk od ;. ߈ࠉࠌࠋࠂ߮ߨߙࠋ㡺. g1 := 2 * g1. 3.2 ϴϚІϪϚЈൾ⻅ςΕお༃ΤΤ⢞†ៀ N 㑦ጟ F (x) ߮࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐᆛ㋡߮ fj 㡸j=0, . . ., N ߋࠉ㡸ୡᷲ x ߫ᝫߑࠋ㑦. 2. 2. ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐᆛ㋡ߕࠌߟ㑦ጟ߮ᅭ㋲ࠒᮀࠁࠋᯜ߮ত. c 2009 Information Processing Society of Japan .
(3) Vol.2009-HPC-122 No.4 2009/10/9. ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲ IPSJ SIG Technical Report. ߪ߄㡺. IF (m < n) THEN RETURN DO k = m, n, −1 i = k−n h(0 : k) = 0.0 DO j = 0, n t = 0.5 * b(j) ; h(i + j) = h(i + j) + t ; h(ABS(i − j)) = h(ABS(i − j)) + t ENDDO q = a(k) / h(k) a(0 : k−1) = a(0 : k−1) - q * h(0: k−1) ENDDO a(n : m) = 0.0 3. • ⏵ೄྰటࠒᮀࠁߟ߄ୡᷲ߮╗ {x1 , x2 , . . . , xp } ߫ᅟᎸߙࠋ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮⏵ೄྰట߮ ╗ {V (x1 ), V (x2 ), . . . , V (xp )} ࠒᮀࠁࠋ㍻߫㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭૯ॹࠒ߂ࠉߋߘࠁ࢟ዕ⁄ᔴߗ ߦয়ᗏߙࠋߔߏ⟦Ḟߪᝪᯜߧ߯ⳇᓻㄤ߯ O(N 2 ) ߨߪࠋߌ㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮૯ॹࠒয়ᗏߛ ߚ߫ळࢩ߮ࠈ߆߫ߙࠋߨ㡸ⳇᓻㄤࠒ O(N ) ߫ॴߙࠋߓߨߌಽ❝ߧ߂ࠋ㡺ߝࠌ߯㡸࠴ ࡦ࡛୭߮㑦ጟࠒ㑧₁߫⁄ᔴߗߦ߄ߏ㍻߫㡸߮㑦ጟ F ≡F0 ࠒᓻ߈ߦߊߏⳇᓻ༴ᕕ ळྺ߫ 2 ৼ߮㑦ጟࠒয়ᗏߧߍࠋⳇᓻ༴ᕕߠߑࠒ≷য়ߗ㡸㑦ጟ Fi−2 ࠒ㑦ጟ Fi−1 ߧதߣߟॿࠒ Fi−2 ߮༴ᕕ߫ㄢ߭ᡂߍߗߦংࠋ㡺ߝ߮〬⍁ߨߨࠂ߫㡸߂ࠉߋߘࠁᗓᄓ ߕࠌߟୡᷲ x1 , x2 , . . . , xp ߫ᝫߑࠋ⏵ೄྰటࠒ㡴ᗓᄓߕࠌߟୡᷲ߫ᝫߑࠋ㑧߫⁄ᔴ ߕࠌߦ߄ߏ㑦ጟ Fi ߮ਓ Fi (x1 ), Fi (x2 ), . . . , Fi (xp ) ࠒᮀࠁߦߝ߮⏵ೄࠒୱᄓߙࠋߓߨ. ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐࠒ⁌߄ߟ㑦ጟ߮ॿⲺᯜ߮ত. ߧ㡵ᠿᝥߗߦ߄ߏ㡺ߓ߮ᝪᯜߧ߯ᎨⱲߪⳇᓻㄤ߯ O(N ) ߫ߪࠋ㡺 ߯㡸ᬖࠓߩ૯ߦ߮༴ೋ߫ߤ߄ߦ㡸ߌ 1 ߚࠌߟ㑦ጟྟߧதࠒ⮷ߪ߆ߓߨ߫ߪࠋ㡺. 5. ㅔ ֆ. 4. ϬϷОГៀΡξρᓴΤ݄⾒Ξ⮳ՉΤູ⃜ࢷҊ. ࠲࠴ࡁ࡛߮߯㡸CPU ߯ Intel Core i7 920(2.67GHz) ߧ 1 ࠝߠߑচ⁌㡸ࡥ. ࠴ࡦ࡛߮ᄓᾤ߫ࠈࠊिᒊ߮ఽ㋨ [a, b] ଁ㡴७ߗ࠼ࠢࡎ࠲ࠢࡐ㑦ጟ߮ᩃ᳒ఽ㋨߫ೡ߾ࠌ. ߯ DDR3-1333 ߮ 2Gbyte×6 ᡦ=12Gbyte(triple channel)㡸ࡌࠟࡤ߯ intel Fortran. ߦ߄ࠋߨߙࠋ㡵ߧ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼߌᮀࠁࠉࠌࠋ߮ߧ㡸ఽ㋨߮ଇࣵୡத␎ࠒ⁌߄ߟᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮. ver11.1 for intel64(ࠥࡒ࠲ࡢ -fast)㡸OS ߯ Fedora 11 for x86 64㡸ࡂࡷ࠺ߨᴘ߮. ࠄ⓸ዕࢨߌಽ❝ߧ߂ࠋ㡺. ਓ߯ IEEE 64bit ৾⓸ዕᰭ௫ᅮᷲߧ߂ࠋ㡴Intel Fortran ߫ࠏߣߦ߄ࠋ৾⓸ዕᴘ. ࠂߗࠂ࠴ࡦ࡛ࣵୡᯜࠒౕỽߧᡊᎂ߾ߧ⁌߄ߦ߮ఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐࠒ૯ߦỾ߄ఽ㋨߫߾ߧ. 㡴128bit㡵ࠒ⁌߄ߦⲺࠒ⮷ߪߣߟ༴ೋ߯㡸৾⓸ዕߧ߮Ⲻ߫ᭉ߹ߦ╝〬៊㋨߯┤ 30 ৾⍁ዕ. ୡ㎮ߙࠋߪࠉ߰㡸N ࠒᝪ⍁ጟ߮㡸r ࠒఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼ㡸ε ࠒ߮ఽ㋨ታ߫ᅟߙࠋᤐ 2. ߮ୡ㎮߮↉ᅟ⓸ዕ߮ᗓᄓߨߙࠋߨ㡸Ⲻㄤ߯ O(rN log2 ε. −1. ㋕ߏߪߣߟ㡵㡺. ៎ၮ: Ⲻ߮ᕞ㋨߮㏻ߋࠉ߯㡸ច߫ᄗᤐߌୡ㎮ߧߍߟఽ㋨߫ᅟߗߦ߯㡸ত߈߰ᝪ⍁ጟ߮. ᄗ 㕰 ߫ ⁌ ߄ ߟ N 㑦 ጟ F (x) ߮ ࠼ࠢࡎ ࠲ࠢࡐ ᆛ ㋡ fk 㡸k=0, 1, . . ., N ߯ √ fk =rk / k + 1㡸k=0, 1, . . ., N −1㡸fN =10−12 ߨࢬ߈ߟ㡺७ߗ rk ≡ cos{(k + 1)2 } ߨߗߟ.. 㑦ጟ߮⏵ೄࠒ⁌߄ࠋࣵୡᯜ㡸த◄ᯜ㡴࠶ࠦࡃᯜ㡵㡸ࡆࡠࡷࡃᯜߪߩ߮ಟ᎖߂ߟࠊ߮ᕞ㋨. ߓ߮ত㒖ߧ߯ᒊℽ߫ᡊ㗀߮㑦߮㡴ߠߑ㡵ࠒ᧤ࠁߦᅮߕ߄ਓ17) ߫ߗߦ߄ࠋ㡺 N. ߌ O(N ) ߮ᯜࠒ⁌߄ࠋᝪߌ㡸ఽ㋨ࠒࣵୡதߙࠋᭆ߫ O(N 2 ) ߮ⲺㄤࠒᎨⱲߨߙࠋ࠴ࡦ. ߌ 100㡸300㡸1000㡸3000 ߮ߝࠌߞࠌ߫ߤ߄ߦ㡸㑦ጟ F (x) ߮ࠫࡤࡐࠒ 6㡸 7㡸 8㡸. ࡛ᯜ߫ᭉ߹ࠋߨ߯ࠋߋ߫❝ℽߧ߂ࠋ㡺. 9 ߫ᙀߒࠋ㡺. ) ߫ߪࠋ㡺. 4.1 ϬϷОГៀΤ⟣Ρ⻖Μ. 5.1 ϬϷОГݐψդΙΜׁᆳΏρଗࢮΤㅔֆ. • ࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒⲺߙࠋ㍻߫㡸ᴘ߫ࠈࠊᰭ௫ᅮᷲ߮ᗓんߌⱻట߮ࠒ⺉߈. ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ F (x) ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼࠒ࠴ࡦ࡛߮ᝪᯜ߫ࠈࠊᮀࠁߟ㡺⏵ೄྰట V (x). ߟߟࠁ߫⁄ߘࠋᡏრ߮࿐ࠄࠝ࠻ࡷࡐࡨࡷ␎ࠒこߙࠋߟࠁ㡸ॿ߮㑦ጟࠒⲺ. ࠒఽ㋨߮ࢸ⏗ x = −1 ߨ x = 1 ߧߝࠌߞࠌᮀࠁߦ V (−1) − V (1) ߫ࠈࠊఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ଁ߮. ߗߟࠉ㡴ߝࠌߌ㎸㑦ጟߧߪߑࠌ߰㡵ߝ߮߮╺ᅟਓ߮ᡊ࿆ਓࠒᮀࠁߦ㡸ࣇࠁⴭቨ. ᤐ߮㡴ㄢⰦࠒ߄ߟ㡵ৼߨߙࠋ㡺ᄗ㕰╡ᢲࠒ߾ߨࠁߟ㡴➱ 1㡵ಜ߳ࠫࡤࡐ㡴 4㡵ߋࠉ㡸 ީ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮ংᔴުಜ߳㡸ច߫ᮀࠁߟ࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒ୵⁌ߗߟީᄗᤐ߮ৼ߮ު߮ߩߡ. ࠒߪࠋ߹ߏᅭ૭ߗߪ߄ࠈ߆߫ߙࠋߟࠁ߫ߝ߮ਓ߫ࠂߣߨࠂ⿏߄ީ༒ (radix)ު߮ታ߮. ࠉࠂ㡸╝〬៊㋨߯㑦ጟ߮ N ߮ 2 ࣚ߫ᭉতߙࠋߓߨߌ≷ⴜߧߍࠋ㡺. ਓ㡴2 〖⯍ᾝ߮ᰭ௫ᅮᷲ߮ީ༒ު߯ 2 ߧ߂ࠋ㡵ࠒ⁌߄ߦ㑦ጟ߮ࠒதߣߦⱻ. ߕࠉ߫㡸࠴ࡦ࡛ࣵୡᯜ߫ࠈࠊ 1) F (x) ߮ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ᄗᤐࠒౕᤐ߫ୡ㎮ߙࠋఽ㋨ࠒ૯ߦ. ᤒటߗߦ߄ࠋ㡺ߓ߮㡴߫ࠈࠋ㡵ⱻᤒటࠒ߈ߦࠂ㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮⏵ೄୱᄓ߯ྰటߗ. 3. c 2009 Information Processing Society of Japan .
(4) Vol.2009-HPC-122 No.4 2009/10/9. ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲ IPSJ SIG Technical Report. ᮀࠁࠋ߾ߧ߮Ⲻ㡸ಜ߳ 2) F (x) ߮ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ᄗᤐࠒఽ㋨ኚ 10−8 ळࢩ߾ߧᮀࠁࠋⲺ㡸. N. ߮ࢸᝪࠒ⮷ߣߟ㡺╡ᢲ߮ਓ㡴➱ 2㡵ߋࠉ㡸㑦ጟ߮ࠒ N 㡸ఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼࠒ r ߨ ߗߦ㡸ఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐ૯んࠒఽ㋨ኚ 10−8 ळࢩ߾ߧᮀࠁࠋ╝〬៊㋨ࠒ ≈ c1 r N 2 ߨߙࠋߨߍ㡸. 100 300 1000 3000 10000. c1 ߯ ≈ 1 × 10−7 (sec) ߨߪߣߟ㡺 10. ➱ 2 ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮ఽ㋨߮ᨖᔴ㡸ಜ߳⓸ዕ 10−8 ߧ߮ᮀⲥ㡺 ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮⁄ᔴ ߕࠌߟ ᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮ఽ㋨߮ᨖᔴ ⓸ዕ 10−8 ߧ߮ᮀⲥ ╝〬៊㋨ (sec) ᄗᤐ߮ৼ ╝〬៊㋨ (sec) ╝〬៊㋨ (sec). 5.9E-5 4.2E-4 4.3E-3 4.2E-2 4.8E-1. 34 86 184 388 1355. 2.6E-3 5.2E-2 1.4E-0 2.7E+1 1.0E+3. 3.8E-2 8.0E-1 1.7E+1 3.1E+2 1.0E+4. make Sturm seq make root count ELAPSE TIME(SECOND). 1. ಜ߳ࠫࡤࡐ㡴 5㡵ߋࠉ㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒ⁄ᔴߗߪߌࠉީᄗᤐ߮ৼ߮ުࠒߙࠋ༴ೋ߮╝ 〬៊㋨ߌ㡸ࠄ߯ࠊ㑦ጟ߮ N ߮ 2 ࣚ߫ᭉতߙࠋߓߨࠒ≷ⴜߧߍࠋ㡺. 0.1. ߕࠉ߫࠴ࡦ࡛ࣵୡᯜ߫ࠈࠊ 1) F (x) ߮ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ᄗᤐࠒౕᤐ߫ୡ㎮ߙࠋఽ㋨ࠒ૯ߦᮀ ࠁࠋ߾ߧ߮Ⲻ㡸ಜ߳ 2) F (x) ߮ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ᄗᤐࠒఽ㋨ኚ 10−8 ळࢩ߾ߧᮀࠁࠋⲺ㡸߮. 0.01. ࢸᝪࠒ⮷ߣߟ㡺╡ᢲ߮ਓ㡴➱ 4㡵ߋࠉ㡸㑦ጟ߮ࠒ N 㡸ఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼࠒ r ߨ ߗߦ㡸ఽ㋨ଁ߮ᄗᤐ૯んࠒఽ㋨ኚ 10−8 ळࢩ߾ߧᮀࠁࠋ╝〬៊㋨ࠒ ≈ c2 r N 2 ߨߙࠋߨߍ㡸. 0.001. c2 ߯ ≈ 3 × 10−7 (sec) ߨߪߣߟ㡺. 0.0001. ࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒয়ᗏߛߚ߫ᭆᎨⱲ߫Ꮈߘߦ⁄ᔴߙࠋߓ߮༴ೋ߯㡸ⳇᓻㄤߌ O(N ) ߨߪࠊ㡸 য়ᗏߙࠋ༴ೋ߮ O(N 2 ) ߫ᭉ߹ߦ࿆ኚ߫ࠋ߮ߧ㡸࿆ߍߪ߮ᝪ⍁ጟ߮ᄗᤐⲺߌ㡴Ⲻ. 1e-05 100 4. 1000 10000 DEGREE OF POLYNOMIAL. 100000. ៊㋨ࠒߋߑࠌ߰㡵ಽ❝ߨߪࠋߋ㡸߮ᅮߕ߄༴ೋ߫߯ᎨⱲߪⳇᓻㄤ߮૯ॹߌࠨ࡞࠾࠲ࡠ ߫ಠ߾ࠊࠄߙߏߪࠋ㡺. ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮⁄ᔴߨᄗᤐ߮ৼ߮╝〬៊㋨㡴ࢸᅟࡒࡨ࠾ࡃ㡵㡺. ᾝປ߮ᄗ⯿߯㡸ᱵߕુ໗ౕ߮┲ߪଇେᾤࠒ⁌߄ߦࣵୡᯜࠒ⮷ߪߣߦ߄ࠋ߮ߧ㡸ఽ㋨߮ ࣵୡதࠒ⮷ߪ߆ߟ߳߫࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒ⁄ᔴߗߪߌࠉ⏵ೄྰటࠒⲺߙࠋ㡺ߝ߮ߟࠁ㡸࠴ࡦ ➱1 N. 100 300 1000 3000 10000 30000. ࡛୭૯ॹࠒ߫࢟ዕⲺߗߦয়ᗏߗ㡸ᎂ߯ߝࠌࠒচ߄░ߑࠋᝪᯜ߫ᭉ߹ࠋߨ㡸ᴘࠂⳇ ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮⁄ᔴߨᄗᤐ߮ৼ߮╝〬៊㋨㡺 ࠴ࡦ࡛୭߮⁄ᔴ ᄗᤐ߮ৼ ߕࠌߟ ╝〬៊㋨ (sec) ╝〬៊㋨ (sec) ᄗᤐ߮ৼ. 5.9E-5 4.2E-4 4.3E-3 4.2E-2 4.8E-1 4.7E-0. 5.1E-5 4.4E-4 4.7E-3 4.3E-2 4.8E-1 4.4E-0. ᓻࠒಗḸߙࠋࠂࢸᝪߨࠂཫ߈ࠋߟࠁ㡸Ⲻ߮╝〬៊㋨ߌ┤ 3 ৾⍁ዕ߫㋕ߏߪߣߦ߄ࠋ㡺 ➱ 3 ᄗᤐ߮ৼ߮╝〬៊㋨㡴࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒᭆ⁄ᔴ㡵㡺 N ᄗᤐ߮ৼ ߕࠌߟ ╝〬៊㋨ (sec) ᄗᤐ߮ৼ. 34 86 184 388 1355 6145. 100 300 1000 3000 10000 30000 100000. 5.2 ϬϷОГݐψׁᆳΑΐΡᜪੈᰨᄘΏρଗࢮΤㅔֆ. 9.0E-5 5.9E-4 6.0E-3 5.4E-2 6.2E-1 5.8E-0 6.7E+1. 34 86 184 388 1355 6145 22952. ࠴ࡦ࡛߮ᝪᯜ߫ࠈࠊఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ F (x) ߮ᄗᤐ߮ৼࠒᮀࠁࠋᄗ㕰╡ᢲ߮ਓ㡴➱ 3㡵. 4. c 2009 Information Processing Society of Japan .
(5) Vol.2009-HPC-122 No.4 2009/10/9. ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲ IPSJ SIG Technical Report. • 〄ኔ߮ఽ㋨߮ࣵୡதᯜࠒୡதᯜ߫ߙࠌ߰Ꮻ❝ࠒީ⢑ު㗀ࠁࠋߓߨߌߧߍࠈ߆㡺ᮀࠁ. 100 Root Counting. ߟ߄ᤐߌ࢟᨟ࡤ࠻࡛߫ୡቶߗߦ߄ࠋߨशᄓߙࠌ߰㡸ୡத߮ 1 ᬳ㍱ߧఽ㋨ࠒ s ␎ୡߙࠋ. ELAPSE TIME(SECOND). 10. ༴ೋ㡸ఽ㋨◹ᅮߧᎊࠋᑔ༲ㄤ߯ log2 (s) ࡎ࠾ࡃߧ߂ࠋ㡺ఽ㋨ࠒ s ୡதࠒߙࠋߟࠁ߫߯㡸 ఽ㋨߮ࢿ߫ᝥߟߪ s−1 ৼ߮ୡᷲ߮ⲺߌᎨⱲߧ㡸ߝࠌࠒ p ৼ߮ࡒࡨ࠶࠰ߧỽ⎻߫⳱সߧ. 1. ߍࠋߨ㡸1 ৼ߮ୡᷲࠒ 1 ࡒࡨ࠶࠰ߧⲺߙࠋ༴ೋ߮ (s−1)/p ৾߮Ⲻ៊㋨ߌᘭߋࠋ㡺. 0.1. ࠈߣߦ㡸ࡒࡨ࠶࠰ࠒ p ৼ߫ߗߟ༴ೋ߮ީᏫ❝ࢨᭉުE(p) ߯ log2 (s)/(s−1)/p ߧ㡸. p ࠒᮡࠁߟߨߍ߫ s=p+1 ߧᡊ࿆ࠒߨࠊ㡸E(p) = log2 (p+1) ߨߪࠋ㡺ཫ߯ࡒࡨ࠶࠰. 0.01. p ߫ᅟߗߦᅟℽߧ㡸E(1) = 1.0㡸E(2) = 1.6㡸E(3) = 2.0㡸E(4) = 2.3㡸E(5) = 2.6㡸. 0.001. E(6) = 2.8㡸E(7) = 3.0㡸E(8) = 3.2 ߪߩߨߪࠋ㡺࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒᭆ⁄ᔴߙࠋ༴ೋ߫ ߯㡸ߝ߮⁄ᔴߙࠋᕞ㋨ࠒ s−1 ৼ߮ୡᷲ߫ᝫߑࠋ⏵ೄྰట߮⳱স߮㋨ߧᡏߧߍࠋ߮. 0.0001. ߧ㡸ࡒࡨ࠶࠾࠰ߌ p = 1 ߮༴ೋߧ߂ߣߦࠂ㡸2 ࠈࠊ࿆ߍ߄ୡத s ࠒᘱࠋߓߨߧ㡸. 1e-05 100. 1000. 10000. ߮ඤߌᡞ፼ߧߍࠋ㡺. 100000. DEGREE OF POLYNOMIAL. • ᾝປ㡸ᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮ౕ߫߯┲ߪఽ㋨߮ଇࣵୡத߫ࠈࠋ⟦Ḟߪᱵߕુᘲ┿ᯜࠒ⁌߄ߦ߄. 5 ᄗᤐ߮ৼ߮╝〬៊㋨㡴࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒᭆ⁄ᔴ㡵㡴ࢸᅟࡒࡨ࠾ࡃ㡵㡺. ࠋߌ㡸ߝࠌࠒ⡁ߗߦᡊ୯߮ఽ㋨߫ೡ߾ࠌࠋᤐ߮ৼߌ߄ߨߍ߫߯ኚુᘲ┿ࠒ⁌߄ ࠋࠈ߆߫ ᯜߨࡂࡷ࠺ᨖ〉ࠒྰᠿߙࠌ߰㡸࢟ዕ߫߾ߨࠁߦ⏵ೄྰట V (x) ࠒⲺߙ ࠋୡᷲ x ߮ৼࠒཫࠄߛࠋ߮ߧ㡸Ⲻࠒ㗀ࠁࠉࠌࠋߧ߂ࠍ߆㡺 㡴ⳇᓻㄤࠒ┤ߙࠋ. ➱4. ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ଁ߮ᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮ఽ㋨߮ᨖᔴ㡸ಜ߳⓸ዕ 10−8 ߧ߮ᮀⲥ㡴࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒᭆ⁄ᔴ㡵㡺 N ߕࠌߟ ᄗᤐ߮ୡ㎮ఽ㋨߮ᨖᔴ ⓸ዕ 10−8 ߧ߮૯ᮀⲥ ᄗᤐ߮ৼ ╝〬៊㋨ (sec) ╝〬៊㋨ (sec). 100 300 1000 3000 10000. 34 86 184 388 1355. 8.1E-3 1.4E-1 3.5E-0 6.9E+1 2.7E+3. ߟࠁ࠴ࡦ࡛୭ࠒয়ᗏߛߚ߫㡸ୡᷲ߮╗ x1 , x2 , . . . , xp ߌᗓᄓߕࠌߟߨߍ߫㑧࠴ࡦ ࡛୭ࠒ⁄ᔴߗߪߌࠉߝࠌ߫ঐߛߦ⏵ೄྰట V (x1 ), V (x2 ), . . . , V (xp ) ࠒ࢟ዕ߫߾ߨࠁ. 1.2E-1 2.2E-0 4.5E+1 7.8E+2 2.7E+4. ߦᮀࠁࠋ༴ೋ߯Ệ߫ߝ߆ߧ߂ࠋ㡵㡺. ࡺ. ⊮. ጬ. ᬈ. 1) ࢨ ጧ: ީఽ㋨ଁߧ߮ↇई㑦ጟᆛ㋡߫ࠈࠋᡏᾤ㋲Ⰾ㋨ު, ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲, 2006-HPC-108 (2006), pp.55-60. 2) ࢨ ጧ: ީਓऱᝪ⍁ጟ߮ࡐࠞࡦ࠺ᅟⲜటᯜ߫ࠈࠋⲥᯜު , ऍ゜࿆ძᾤⲥᢨ∩⎇ ᕕⶂ⎇㈕, No.1652 (2009), pp.134-145. 3) Hiroshi Murakami: ”Application of Filter Diagonalization Method to Numerical Solution of Algebraic Equations”, proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Symbolic-Numeric Computation (SNC2009), Kyoto, Japan (2009), pp.95-104. 4) 㗀ᡣ⸗ᯈ: ީऱძⶂ⚗ (ⲵᝥấ)ު, ⏻ 3 ⏊:‘࠴ࡦ࡛߮උ㒖, ᤐ߮Ⲻ’, ⎻ấ (1965). 5) Abramowitz,M. and Stegun,I.A. Eds.: Handbook of Mathematical Functions: with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, New York, Dover (1972). 6) Bini,D.A., Daddi,F. and Gemignani,L.: ”On the Shifted QR Iteration Applied to. 6. ӿསΤ⤜ぺ㑤ዾইΤࢠ⍁࿏ • झ߮ᄗ㕰ߧ߯૯ߦ 1CPU ଁ߮ 1 ࠝߧ⮷ߪߣߦߊࠊ㡸ࢻ୭ట߯૯ߏߗߦ߄ߪ߄㡺 ߮㗀߄༴ೋࠄᮀࠁࠋᤐ߮ৼߌ߄༴ೋ߫߯㡸MPI ࠄ OpenMP ߪߩࠒ⁌߄ߟࢻ୭େᾤࠒ ⮷߆ߓߨߧ㡸࠴ࡦ࡛୭⁄ᔴ߮㑦ጟॿ߮Ⲻࠒ㗀〈టߙࠋߓߨߌಽ❝ߧ߂ࠋ㡺࠼ࠢ ࡎ࠲ࠢࡐߋࠉࢬ߈ࠉࠌߟୡᷲ߫ᅟߙࠋ㑦ጟ߮ਓࠒⲺߙࠋᕕ߯㡸Clenshaw ߮ ᯜ߮߾߾ߧ߯ᴭటጟ߫༒ߥߏ⿻େᾤ߮ߟࠁ㡸ᝪࠒୡதߗߟࢻ୭ట߯ᢌߪ߄㡺. 5. c 2009 Information Processing Society of Japan .
(6) Vol.2009-HPC-122 No.4 2009/10/9. ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲ IPSJ SIG Technical Report. Companion Matrices”, ETNA(Electronic Transaction on Numerical Analysis), v18 (2004), pp.137–152. 7) Boyd,J. P.: ”Computing Zeros on a Real Interval Through Chebyshev Expansion and Polynomial Rootfinding”, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v40, no.5 (2002), pp.1666– 1682. 8) Boyd, J.P. and Gally, D.H.: ”Numerical Experiments on the Accuracy of the Chebyshev-Frobenius Companion Matrix Method for Finding the Zeros of a Truncated Series of Chebyshev Polynomials”, J. Comput. and Appl. Math., v205, no.1 (2007), p.281-295. 9) Boyd,J. E.: ”Computing Real Roots of a Polynomial in Chebyshev Series form Through Subdivision”, Applied Numerical Math., v56, no.8 (2006), pp.1077–1091. 10) Day,D. and Romero,L.: ”Roots of Polynomials Expressed in Terms of Orthogonal Polynomials”, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., v43, no.5 (2005), pp.1969–1987. 11) Gautschi, W.: ”The Condition of Orthogonal Polynomials”, Math. Comp., v26, no.120 (1972), pp.923–924. 12) Gautschi, W.: ”On the Condition of Algebraic Equations”, Numer. Math., v21 (1973), pp.405–424. 13) Gautschi,W.: ”The Condition of Polynomials in Power Form”, Math. Comp., v33, no.145 (1979), pp.343–352. 14) Golub,G.H. and Van Loan,C.F.: Matrix Computations, 3rd Ed., The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland (1983). 15) Hasegawa, T., Torii, T. and Sugiura, H.: ”An algorithm based on the FFT for a generalized Chebyshev interpolations”, Math. Comp., v54 (1990), pp.195–210. 16) Jia,Z. and Stewart,G.W.: ”An Analysis of the Rayleigh-Ritz Method for Approximating Eigenspaces”, Math. Comp., v70, no.234(2001), pp.637–647. 17) G.F.J´ onsson and S. Vavasis, J´ onsson,G.F. and Vavasis,S.: ”Solving polynomials with small leading coefficients”, SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl., v26 (2004), pp.400– 414. 18) Sherlock,B.G. and Monro,D.M.: ”Algorithm 749:fast discrete cosine transform”, ACM Trans. Math. Soft., v21, no.4 (1995), pp.372–378. 19) Szeg¨ o,G.: Orthogonal Polynomials, 4th Ed., AMS Colloquium Publications XXIII, New York (1975).. Random Polynomial of Degree 100. 6. Value of Polynomial. 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -1. -0.5. 0. 0.5. 1. x 6 ত㒖߮ࡤ࠻࡛㑦ጟ㡴N = 100㡵㡺ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ߫ᤐ߯ 34 ৼ㡺. Random Polynomial of Degree 300. 6. Value of Polynomial. 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -1. -0.5. 0. 0.5. 1. x 7 ত㒖߮ࡤ࠻࡛㑦ጟ㡴N = 300㡵㡺ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ߫ᤐ߯ 86 ৼ㡺. 6. c 2009 Information Processing Society of Japan .
(7) Vol.2009-HPC-122 No.4 2009/10/9. ᑔ༲େᾤძॗ∩⎇༲ IPSJ SIG Technical Report. Random Polynomial of Degree 1000. 6. Value of Polynomial. 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -1. -0.5. 0. 0.5. 1. x 8 ত㒖߮ࡤ࠻࡛㑦ጟ㡴N = 1000㡵㡺ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ߫ᤐ߯ 184 ৼ㡺. Random Polynomial of Degree 3000. 6. Value of Polynomial. 4 2 0 -2 -4 -6 -1. -0.5. 0. 0.5. 1. x 9 ত㒖߮ࡤ࠻࡛㑦ጟ㡴N = 3000㡵㡺ఽ㋨ [−1, 1] ߫ᤐ߯ 388 ৼ㡺. 7. c 2009 Information Processing Society of Japan .
(8)
関連したドキュメント
We are going to represent λ-calculus via a translation into MELL proofnets MELL proofnets are going to be presented via a mix between sharing graphs (i.e. numbered interaction nets)
The idea is that this series can now be used to define the exponential of large classes of mathematical objects: complex numbers, matrices, power series, operators?. For the
In particular, we show that, when such a polynomial exists, it is unique and it is the sum of certain Chebyshev polynomials of the first kind in any faithful irreducible character of
Sreenadh; Existence and multiplicity results for Brezis-Nirenberg type fractional Choquard equation, NoDEA Nonlinear Differential Equations Applications Nodea., 24 (6) (2016), 63..
The solution is represented in explicit form in terms of the Floquet solution of the particular instance (arising in case of the vanishing of one of the four free constant
In the second computation, we use a fine equidistant grid within the isotropic borehole region and an optimal grid coarsening in the x direction in the outer, anisotropic,
Theorem 4.8 shows that the addition of the nonlocal term to local diffusion pro- duces similar early pattern results when compared to the pure local case considered in [33].. Lemma
Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,