• 検索結果がありません。

Shizuno SEKIGUCHI Let ˜ M n+1 (c) be an (n + 1)-dimensional real space form of constant sectional curvature c.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Shizuno SEKIGUCHI Let ˜ M n+1 (c) be an (n + 1)-dimensional real space form of constant sectional curvature c."

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

周期的リッチ平行テンソルを持つ超曲面について On hypersurfaces with cyclic Ricci parallel tensor

数学専攻 関口静乃

Shizuno SEKIGUCHI Let ˜ M n+1 (c) be an (n + 1)-dimensional real space form of constant sectional curvature c.

For each real namber c and each integer n > 1 there is (up to isometry) exactly one n-dimensional space form of constant sectional curvature c.

(i)

if c = 0, then ˜ M n+1 (c) is Euclidean space E n+1 .

(ii)

if c < 0, then ˜ M n+1 (c) is Real hyperbolic space H n+1 (c).

(iii)

if c > 0, then ˜ M n+1 (c) is the sphere S n+1 (c) in Euclidean space.

Let M n be a hypersurface in ˜ M n+1 (c). A Riemannian manifold M n together with an isometric immersion f of M n into ˜ M n+1 (c) is called a hypersurface of ˜ M n+1 (c). Then f is one to one and g is given by

g = f ˜ g,

where ˜ g is the Riemannian metric of ˜ M n+1 (c). The metric g is called the induced metric on M n . Let ξ be a unit normal vector. Let ˜ and be the covariant differentiations of ˜ M n+1 (c) from Riemannian metric ˜ g and from Riemannian metric g, respectively. Then we have the following

˜ f

X f Y = f X Y + g(AX, Y )ξ,

· · · Gauss formula

˜ f

X ξ = −f AX,

· · · Weingarten formula where

˜

g(ξ, ξ) = 1, ˜ g(f X, ξ) = 0.

In the following, let A denote the second fundamental form. Then we have R(X, Y )Z = c{g(Y, Z)X g(X, Z)Y } + g(AY, Z)AX g(AX, Z)AY,

· · · Gauss equation

1

(2)

(∇ X A)Y = (∇ Y A)X.

· · · Codazzi equation Now M n is called a locally symmetric space if the curvature tensor R of M n satisfies

∇R = 0.

For example, a piece of the product of two spaces of constant curvature is a locally symmetric space. Let S be the Ricci tensor of M n . Then it is naturally considered the question under the weaker condition of

∇S = 0

(from now on, we call M n a hypersurface with parallel Ricci tensor) than ∇R = 0. With regard to this, P.J.Ryan proved the following: If M n is not constant curvature c and if ∇S = 0 on M n , then M n is an open subset of one of the product of space forms ˜ M k (c 1 ) × M ˜ n−k (c 2 ), 1 k n, or c = 0 and rankA = 2 on M n , where c 1 and c 2 are constant curvatures.

The Ricci tensor S is called the cyclic Ricci parallel tensor if S satisfies S(∇ X S)(Y, Z ) = 0

for any X , Y and Z tangent to M n .

The purpose of this paper is to classify hypersurfaces with cyclic Ricci parallel tensor in a real space form. We notice that this condition is weaker than ∇S = 0. We prove the following theorem:

Theorem. Let M n be a hypersurface with cyclic Ricci parallel tensor in a real space form M ˜ n+1 (c) of constant sectional curvature c. If S(∇ X S)(Y, Z) = 0 and trace A = constant , then

∇A = 0 and a M n is a piece of the two spaces of constant curvature which is a locally symmetric space.

Let ˜ M n+1 (c) be an (n + 1)-dimensional space form, i.e., a Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature, say, c. Let f : M M ˜ be an isometric immersion of an n - dimensional Riemannian manifold M into ˜ M (c). For simplicity, we say that M is a hypersurface immersed in ˜ M and, for all local formulas and computations, we may consider f as an imbedding and thus identify x M with f (x) M ˜ . The tangent space T x (M ) is identified with a subspace of the tangent space T x ( ˜ M ), and the normal space T x is the subspace of T x ( ˜ M ) consisting of all X T x ( ˜ M ) which are orthogonal to T x (M ) with respect to the Riemannian metric g.

For an arbitrary point x 0 M , we may choose a field of unit normal vectors ξ defined in a neighborhood U of x 0 . The second fundamental form h and the corresponding symmetric opreator A are defined and related to covariant differentiations ˜ and in ˜ M and M , respectively, by the following formulas:

(1) ˜ X Y = X Y + h(X, Y ),

2

(3)

(2) ˜ X ξ = −AX,

where X and Y are vecter fields tangent to M . We rewrite the Gauss equation as follows

(3) R(X, Y ) = cX Y + AX AY, X, Y T x (M ),

where X Y denotes the skew-symmetric endomorphism of T x (M ) defined by (X Y )Z = g(Y, Z )X g(X, Z)Y .

Also,we have the Codazzi equaton as Introduction (4) (∇ X A)(Y ) = (∇ Y A)(X ).

For any point x of U the (0,2)-type Ricci tensor S of M is defined by

S(X, Y ) = X n i=1

g(R(X, e i )e i , Y ).

(5)

Then from (3) we have

S(X, Y ) = (n 1)cg(X, Y ) + (traceA)g(AX, Y ) g(A 2 X, Y ).

(6)

By using Gauss equation and this definition, we also have the following (∇ X S)(Y, Z) = X (S(Y, Z)) S(∇ X Y, Z) S(Y, X Z) (7)

= X ((n 1)cg(Y, Z ) + (traceA)g(AY, Z) g(A 2 Y, Z))

((n 1)cg(∇ X Y, Z) + (traceA)g(A∇ X Y, Z) g(A 2 X Y, Z ))

((n 1)cg(Y, X Z) + (traceA)g(AY, X Z) g(A 2 Y, X Z))

= (traceA)g((∇ X A)Y, Z) g((∇ X A 2 )Y, Z ).

From (6) we have

(∇ X S)(Y, Z) + (∇ Y S)(Z, X) + (∇ Z S)(X, Y ) (8)

= (traceA)g((∇ X A)Y, Z) g((∇ X A 2 )Y, Z ) + (traceA)g((∇ Y A)Z, X ) g((∇ Y A 2 )Z, X ) + (traceA)g((∇ Z A)X, Y ) g((∇ Z A 2 )X, Y )

= 3(traceA)g((∇ X A)Y, Z) g((∇ X A 2 )Y, Z)

g((∇ Y A 2 )Z, X ) g((∇ Z A 2 )X, Y ).

3

(4)

By this equation and Codazzi equation we obtein

(9) A(∇ X A)Y = 3(traceA)

2 (∇ X A)Y (∇ X A)AY (∇ Y A)AX.

Proposition 1 (P.J Ryan) Let M be a hypersurface of dimension > 2 in a real space form of constant curvature c. If M is not of constant curvature c and if ∇S = 0 on M , then M is an open subset of one of the standard examples or c = 0 and rankA = 2 on M .

Proposition 2 (P.J Ryan) Suppose that traceA is constant and ∇S = 0 ( S is the Ricci tensor). Then ∇A = 0.

Proposition 3 T λ

i

is differentiable.

The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to Professor Y.Matsuyama for his valuable suggestions during the preparation of this paper.

1

参考文献

[1]Y.Matsuyama,Minimal Submanifolds in S N and R N ,Math.Z.175(1980),275-282

[2]Patrick J.Ryan,Homogeneity and Some Curvature Conditions for Hypersurfaces,Tohoku Math.

Journ.21(1969),363-388

[3]Patrick J.Ryan,Hypersurfaces with Parallel Ricci Tensor,Osaka J.Math.8(1971),251-259 [4]Katsumi Nomizu,On Hypersurfaces Satisfying a Certain Condition on The Curvature Ten- sor,Tohoku Math.Journ.20(1968),46-59

[5]Josrph Erbacher,Isometric Immersions of Constant mean Curvature and Triviality of The Nomal Connection,Nagoya Math.J.Vol45(1971),139-165

Department of mathmatices Chuo University 1-13-27 Kasuga,Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 112-8551,Japan

4

参照

関連したドキュメント

In Section 3 the extended Rapcs´ ak system with curvature condition is considered in the n-dimensional generic case, when the eigenvalues of the Jacobi curvature tensor Φ are

Concerning the Goldberg conjecture, we will prove a result obtained by applying the result of Iton in terms of L 2 -norm of the scalar curvature.. 2000 Mathematics

Let C be a co-accessible category with weak limits, then the objects of the free 1 -exact completion of C are exactly the weakly representable functors from C

In section 4, with the help of the affine deviation tensor, first we introduce the basic curvature data (affine and projective curvatures, Berwald curvature, Douglas curvature) of

The key points in the proof of Theorem 1.2 are Lemma 2.2 in Section 2 and the study of the holonomy algebra of locally irreducible compact manifolds of nonnegative isotropic

The Yamabe invariant is a diffeomorphism invariant that historically arose from an attempt to construct Einstein metrics (metrics of constant Ricci curvature) on smooth

We also investigate some properties of curvature tensor, conformal curvature tensor, W 2 - curvature tensor, concircular curvature tensor, projective curvature tensor,

In analogy with Aubin’s theorem for manifolds with quasi-positive Ricci curvature one can use the Ricci flow to show that any manifold with quasi-positive scalar curvature or