• 検索結果がありません。

On the Sets of Regularity of Solutions for a Class of Degenerate Nonlinear Elliptic Fourth-Order Equations with L

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "On the Sets of Regularity of Solutions for a Class of Degenerate Nonlinear Elliptic Fourth-Order Equations with L"

Copied!
15
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Boundary Value Problems

Volume 2007, Article ID 65825,15pages doi:10.1155/2007/65825

Research Article

On the Sets of Regularity of Solutions for a Class of Degenerate Nonlinear Elliptic Fourth-Order Equations with L

1

Data

S. Bonafede and F. Nicolosi

Received 24 January 2007; Accepted 29 January 2007 Recommended by V. Lakshmikantham

We establish H¨older continuity of generalized solutions of the Dirichlet problem, asso- ciated to a degenerate nonlinear fourth-order equation in an open bounded setΩRn, withL1data, on the subsets ofΩwhere the behavior of weights and of the data is regular enough.

Copyright © 2007 S. Bonafede and F. Nicolosi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, dis- tribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

In this paper, we will deal with equations involving an operator A:W 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω) (W 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω))of the form

Au=

|α|=1,2

(1)|α|DαAα

x,2u, (1.1)

whereΩis a bounded open set ofRn,n >4, 2< p < n/2, max(2p,n)< q < n,νandμare positive functions inΩwith properties precised later,W 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω) is the Banach space of all functions uRwith the properties|u|q|Dαu|q|Dβu|pL1(Ω),|α| =1,

|β| =2, and “zero” boundary values;2u= {Dαu:|α| ≤2}.

The functionsAαsatisfy growth and monotonicity conditions, and in particular, the following strengthened ellipticity condition (for a.e.xΩandξ= {ξα:|α| =1, 2}):

|α|=1,2

Aα(x,ξ)ξαc2

|α|=1

ν(x)ξαq+

|α|=2

μ(x)ξαp

g2(x), (1.2) wherec2>0,g2(x)L1(Ω).

(2)

We will assume that the right-hand sides of our equations, depending on unknown function, belong toL1(Ω).

A model representative of the given class of equations is the following:

|α|=1

Dα

ν

|β|=1

Dβu2 (q2)/2

Dαu

+

|α|=2

Dα

μ

|β|=2

Dβu2 (p2)/2

Dαu

= −|u|σ1u+f inΩ, (1.3) whereσ >1 and f L1(Ω).

The assumed conditions and known results of the theory of monotone operators allow us to prove existence of generalized solutions of the Dirichlet problem associated to our operator (see, e.g., [1]), bounded on the setsGΩwhere the behavior of weights and of the data of the problem is regular enough (see [2]).

In our paper, following the approach of [3], we establish on such sets a result on H¨older continuity of generalized solutions of the same Dirichlet problem.

We note that for one high-order equation with degenerate nonlinear operator satisfy- ing a strengthened ellipticity condition, regularity of solutions was studied in [4,5] (non- degenerate case) and in [6,7] (degenerate case). However, it has been made for equations with right-hand sides inLtwitht >1.

2. Hypotheses

LetnN,n >4, and letΩbe a bounded open set ofRn. Let p,q be two real numbers such that 2< p < n/2, max(2p,n)< q < n.

LetνR+be a measurable function such that νL1loc(Ω), 1

ν 1/(q1)

L1loc(Ω). (2.1)

W1,q(ν,Ω) is the space of all functions uLq(Ω) such that their derivatives, in the sense of distribution,Dαu,|α| =1, are functions for which the following properties hold:

ν1/qDαuLq(Ω) if|α| =1;W1,q(ν,Ω) is a Banach space with respect to the norm u1,q,ν=

Ω|u|qdx+

|α|=1

ΩνDαuqdx 1/q

. (2.2)

W 1,q(ν,Ω) is the closure ofC0(Ω) inW1,q(ν,Ω).

Letμ(x) :ΩR+be a measurable function such that μL1loc(Ω), 1

μ 1/(p1)

L1loc(Ω). (2.3)

W2,p1,q(ν,μ,Ω) is the space of all functionsuW1,q(ν,Ω), such that their derivatives, in the sense of distribution,Dαu,|α| =2, are functions with the following properties:

(3)

μ1/ pDαuLp(Ω),|α| =2;W2,p1,q(ν,μ,Ω) is a Banach space with respect to the norm

u = u1,q,ν+

|α|=2

ΩμDαupdx 1/ p

. (2.4)

W 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω) is the closure ofC0(Ω) inW2,p1,q(ν,μ,Ω).

Hypothesis 2.1. Letν(x) be a measurable positive function:

1

νLt(Ω) witht > nq q2n, νLt(Ω) witht > nt

qtn.

(2.5)

We putq=nqt/(n(1 +t)qt). We can easily prove that a constantc0>0 exists such that ifuW 1,q(ν,Ω), the following inequality holds:

Ω|u|qdxc0

suppu

1 ν

t

dx

q/qt

|α|=1

Ων|Dαu|qdx q/q

. (2.6)

We setν=μq/(q2p)(1/ν)2p/(q2p). Hypothesis 2.2. νL1(Ω).

Hypothesis 2.3. There exists a real numberr >q(q 1)/(q(q 1)(p1)q) such that 1

μLr(Ω). (2.7)

For more details about weight functions, see [8,9].

LetΩ1be a nonempty open set ofRnsuch thatΩ1Ω.

Definition 2.4. It is said thatGclosed set ofRnis a “regular set” ifG is nonempty and GΩ1.

Denote byRn,2the space of all setsξ= {ξαR:|α| =1, 2}of real numbers; if a func- tionuL1loc(Ω) has the weak derivativesDαu,|α| =1, 2 then2u= {Dαu:|α| =1, 2}. Suppose thatAα×Rn,2Rare Carath´eodory functions.

Hypothesis 2.5. There exist c1,c2>0 andg1(x), g2(x) nonnegative functions such that g1,g2L1(Ω) and, for almost everyxΩ, for everyξRn,2, the following inequalities

(4)

hold:

|α|=1

ν(x)1/(q1)Aα(x,ξ)q/(q1)+

|α|=2

μ(x)1/(p1)Aα(x,ξ)p/(p1)

c1

|α|=1

ν(x)ξαq+

|α|=2

μ(x)ξαp +g1(x),

(2.8)

|α|=1,2

Aα(x,ξ)ξαc2

|α|=1

ν(x)ξαq+

|α|=2

μ(x)ξαp

g2(x). (2.9)

Moreover, we will assume that for almost everyxΩand everyξRn,2,ξ=ξ,

|α|=1,2

Aα(x,ξ)Aα(x,ξ)ξαξα>0. (2.10)

LetF×RRbe a Carath´eodory function such that

(a) for almost everyxΩ, the functionF(x,·) is nonincreasing inR; (b) for everyxΩ, the functionF(·,s) belongs toL1(Ω).

LetA:W 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω)(W 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω))be the operator such that for everyu,vW 1,q2,p(ν, μ,Ω),

Au,v =

Ω

|α|=1,2

Aα

x,2uDαv

dx. (2.11)

We consider the following Dirichlet problem:

(P)=

Au=F(x,u) inΩ

Dαu=0, |α| =0, 1, on∂Ω. (2.12) Definition 2.6. AW-solution of problem (P) is a functionuW2,1(Ω) such that

(i)F(x,u)L1(Ω);

(ii)Aα(x,2u)L1(Ω), for everyα:|α| =1, 2;

(iii)Au,φ = F(x,u),φin distributional sense.

It is well known that Hypotheses2.1–2.3,2.5, and assumptions onF(x,s) imply the existence of aW-solution of problem (P) (see [1]). Moreover, a boundedness local result for such solution has been established in [2] under more restrictive hypotheses on data and weight functions.

More precisely, the following holds (see [2, Theorem 5.1]).

Theorem 2.7. Suppose that Hypotheses2.1–2.3and2.5 are satisfied. Let q1(q,q(q 1)/q),τ >q/( qq1). Assume that restrictions of the functionsνq1/(q1q),ν,g1,g2, and|F(·, 0)|q1/(q11)onGbelong toLτ(G), for every “regular set”G.

Then there existsu W-solution of problem (P) such that for everyG, essGsup|u| ≤MG<

+, withMGpositive constant depending only on known values.

(5)

3. Main result

In the sequel of paper,Gwill be a “regular set.” In order to obtain our regularity result on G, we need the following further hypotheses.

Hypothesis 3.1. There exists a constantc>0 such that for allyG and for allρ >0, with B(y,ρ)G, we have

ρn

B(y,ρ)

1 ν

t

dx 1/t

ρn

B(y,ρ)ντdx 1/τ

c. (3.1)

With regard to this assumption, see [3].

Hypothesis 3.2. There exist a real positive numberσ and two real functionsh(x)(0), f(x)(>0) defined onG, such that

F(x,s)h(x)|s|σ+f(x), for almost everyxGand everysR. (3.2) Moreover, we assume that

h(x),f(x)Lτ(G), (3.3)

withτdefined as above.

Using considerations stated in [1], following the approach of [3], we establish the fol- lowing result.

Theorem 3.3. Let all above-stated hypotheses hold and let conditions ofTheorem 2.7be satisfied. Then, theW-solutionuof Dirichlet problem (P), essentially bounded onG, is also locally H¨olderian onG.

More precisely, there exist positive constantCandλ(0< λ <1) such that for every open setΩG, and every x,yΩ

u(x)u(y)CdΩ,∂Gλ|xy|λ, (3.4) whereCandλdepend only onc1,c2,c0,c,n,q,p,t,τ,σ,MG, diamG, measG,fLτ(G), hLτ(G),g1Lτ(G),g2Lτ(G),νLτ(G), and1/νLt(Ω).

Proof. For everylN, we define the functionFl×RRby

Fl(x,s)=

l ifF(x, 0)F(x,s)<l, F(x, 0)F(x,s) ifF(x, 0)F(x,s)l, l ifF(x, 0)F(x,s)> l,

(3.5)

and the function flRby fl(x)=

F(x, 0) ifF(x, 0)l,

0 ifF(x, 0)> l. (3.6)

(6)

By Lebesgue’s theorem and property (b) ofF(x,s), we have that fl(x) goes toF(x, 0) in L1(Ω).

Next, inequalities (2.6), (2.8)–(2.10), property (a) ofF(x,s), and known results of the theory of monotone operators (see, e.g., [10]) imply that for any lN, there existsul W1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω) such that

Ω

|α|=1,2

Aαx,2ulDαv+Flx,ulv

dx=

Ωflv dx, (3.7) for everyvW 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω).

From considerations stated in [1, Section 3], we deduce that there exists aW-solution uof problem (P) such that

ul−→u a.e. inΩ. (3.8)

Moreover, see proof ofTheorem 2.7,

essG supulMG, for everylN. (3.9) We setn=q2/(q2p),a=(1/n)(qn/tn/τ).

Let us fixyG, ρ >0 andB(y, 2ρ)G. Let us put ω1,l= ess

B(y,2ρ)inful, ω2,l= ess

B(y,2ρ)supul,

ωl=ω2,lω1,l. (3.10)

We will show that

oscul,B(y,ρ) l+ρa, (3.11) withc]0, 1[ independent oflN.

To this aim, we fixlNand we set Φl=

|α|=1

νDαulq+

|α|=2

μDαulp,

ψ(x)=ρan1 +f(x) +h(x) +g1(x) +g2(x) +ν(x)+ρqν. (3.12) Obviously, we will assume that

ωlρa (otherwise, it is clear that (3.11) is true). (3.13) We introduce now the following functions:

F1,l(x)=

2eωl

ul(x)ω1,l+ρa ifxB(y, 2ρ), e ifxΩ\B(y, 2ρ);

(3.14)

(7)

ϕC0(Ω): 0ϕ1 inΩ,ϕ=0 inΩ\B(y, 2ρ) and satisfying

Dαϕ−|α|, |α| =1, 2, (3.15) where the positive constantcdepends only onn.

Let us fixs > qandr0 and define vl=

lgF1,lr

F1,lq1ϕs, zl= − 1

2eωl

rlgF1,lr1

+ (q1)lgF1,lr

F1,lqϕs. (3.16) FromHypothesis 2.2and (3.15), we have thatvlW 1,q2,p(ν,μ,Ω) and the next inequal- ities are true:

DαvlzlDαulcsϕs1lgF1,l

r

F1,lq1ρ1 if|α| =1 a.e. inB(y, 2ρ), (3.17) DαvlzlDαul5q2s(r+ 1)2lgF1,l

r

F1,lq1ϕs

|β|=1

|Dβul|2 ulω1,l+ρa2

+ 2nqs2c2ρ2lgF1,l

r

F1,lq1ϕs2 if|α| =2 a.e. inB(y, 2ρ).

(3.18)

Sinceul(x) satisfies (3.7), forv=vl, we obtain

Ω

|α|=1,2

Aαx,2ulDαvl+Flx,ulvl

dx=

Ωflvldx. (3.19) From this, taking into account (3.9) andHypothesis 3.2, we have

Ω

|α|=1,2

Aαx,2ulDαvldx

3 +MGσ

Ω

1 +f(x) +h(x)vldx. (3.20)

Hence

Ω

|α|=1,2

Aα x,2ul

Dαul

zl dx

3 +MσG

Ω

1 +f(x) +h(x)vldx+I1+I2, (3.21) where

Ii=

Ω

|α|=i

Aαx,2ulDαvlzlDαuldx, i=1, 2. (3.22)

UsingHypothesis 2.5and definition ofzl, we have (q1)c2

2eωl

ΩΦl lgF1,lr

F1,lqϕsdx

3 +MGσ

Ω

1 +f(x) +h(x)lgF1,lr

F1,lq1ϕsdx +

Ωg2(x)zl

dx+I1+I2.

(3.23)

(8)

Note that

F1,lq1(diamG)a2eωlq1ρaq,

zl(q1)(r+ 1)2eωlq1ρaqϕslgF1,lr a.e. inB(y, 2ρ), (3.24) consequently, from (3.23), we obtain

c2

2eωl

B(y,2ρ)Φl

lgF1,lrF1,lqϕsdx

c3(r+ 1)2eωlq1

B(y,2ρ)ρaq1 +f(x) +h(x) +g2(x)lgF1,lr

ϕsdx+I1+I2, (3.25) wherec3=(q1)(3 +MσG)(diamG+ 1).

Let us fix|α| =1. Let>0, then, applying Young’s inequality and using (2.8) and (3.17), we establish

I1 c1 2eωl

B(y,2ρ)ΦlF1,lqlgF1,l

r ϕsdx +c1

2eωlq1

B(y,2ρ)ρaqg1(x)lgF1,lrϕsdx +1q

2eωlq1

n(cs)q

B(y,2ρ)ρqνlgF1,lr

ϕsqdx.

(3.26)

Let us fix|α| =2 and estimateI2. To this aim, it will be useful to observe that the following equalities are true:

p1 p +2

q+q2p

qp =1, q1= p1 p q+

q p1

. (3.27)

Moreover,

ρaq2pμρanν+ρqν inΩ. (3.28) Furthermore, due to (2.8), (3.18), and Young’s inequality, we have

I2 c4 2eωl

B(y,2ρ)ΦlF1,lqlgF1,lrϕsdx +c5

2eωlq1

1 +1

n

sn(r+ 1)n

B(y,2ρ)

ρang1(x) +ν(x)+ρqνlgF1,lr

ϕsqdx, (3.29) wherec4depends only onc1,n,q; andc5depends only onc1,n,q,p,c, and diamG.

(9)

From (3.25), (3.26), and (3.29), we get c2

2eωl

B(y,2ρ)Φl

lgF1,l

r

F1,lq ϕsdx

c1+c4

2eωl

B(y,2ρ)ΦlF1,lqlgF1,lrϕsdx +2eωl

q1

c6(r+ 1)nsn

1 ++1

n+1

B(y,2ρ)ψlgF1,l

r ϕsqdx,

(3.30)

where the constantc6depends only onc1,c,n,q,p,MG,σ, and diamG.

Setting

= c2

2c1+c4

, (3.31)

from the last inequality, we deduce

B(y,2ρ)Φl

lgF1,lrF1,lqϕsdxc7

2eωlq(r+ 1)nsn

B(y,2ρ)ψlgF1,lrϕsqdx, (3.32) where the constantc7depends only onc1,c2,c,n,q,p,MG,σ, and diamG.

Now, if we chooseϕsuch thatϕ=1 inB(y, (4/3)ρ), from (3.32), withr=0 ands= q+ 1, we get

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

|α|=1

νDαulq

F1,lqdxc7 2eωlq

(q+ 1)n

B(y,2ρ)ψdx. (3.33)

Moreover, if we take in (3.32) instead ofϕthe functionϕ1C0(Ω) with the properties 0ϕ11 inΩ,ϕ1=0 inΩ\B(y, (4/3)ρ),ϕ1=1 inB(y,ρ), and|Dαϕ| ≤−|α|inΩ,

|α| =1, 2, we obtain that for everyr >0 ands > q,

B(y,2ρ)

|α|=1

νDαulq

lgF1,lrF1,lqdxc7

2eωlqsn(r+ 1)n

B(y,2ρ)ψlgF1,lrϕs1qdx.

(3.34) We fix arbitraryr >0 ands >q, and let

zl=

lgF1,lr/q

ϕs/1q. (3.35)

By means ofHypothesis 2.1, we establish thatzlW1,q(ν,Ω) and for|α| =1, νDαzlq2q1

r q

q

lgF1,l(r/q1)qF1,lq 1

2eωlqDαulqνϕsq/1 q + 2q1

s q

q

lgF1,lrq/q

ϕ(s/1 q1)qcqρqν.

(3.36)

(10)

Now, it is convenient to observe thatq/( qq1)> nt/(qtn), thenτ > nt/(qtn);

moreover,ψ(x)Lτ(G). From (3.34) and (3.36), we deduce

ΩνDαzlqdx

c8sn(r+1)n+q

B(y,2ρ)ψτdx 1/τ

B(y,2ρ)

lgF1,lr(q/q)(τ/(τ 1))ϕ(s/1 q1)q(τ/(τ1))dx 1)/τ

, (3.37) where the constantc8depends only onc1,c2,c,n,q,p,MG,σ, and diamG.

We set

θ=q(τ 1)

, m=

τ1, (3.38)

and for everyr,s >0, we define I(r,s)=

B(y,2ρ)

lgF1,l

r

ϕs1dx. (3.39)

Consequently, last inequality can be rewritten in this manner:

ΩνDαzlqdxc8sn(r+ 1)n+q

B(y,2ρ)ψτdx 1/τ

I r

θ,s θm

1)/τ

. (3.40) Due toHypothesis 2.1,

I(r,s)=

B(y,2ρ)zqldxc0

B(y,2ρ)

1 ν

t

dx

q/qt

|α|=1

ΩνDαzlqdx q/q

. (3.41) Let us denote byGthe norm of (1 +f(x) +h(x) +g1(x) +g2(x) +ν(x)) inLτ(G). By simple computation, we have

B(y,2ρ)ψτdx 1/τ

ρq

B(y,2ρ)ντdx 1/τ

+Gρan. (3.42) Now, it is convenient to observe that (qn/tn/τ)(q/q) =n(θ1).

Then, from (3.40)–(3.42), usingHypothesis 3.1, we get I(r,s)M(r+s)mρn(1θ)

I

r θ,s

θm θ

, for everyr >0,s >q, (3.43) wherem=2(q+n)qand the positive constantMdepends only onc1,c2,c,c0,c,n,q,p, t,1/νLt(Ω),MG,σ, measG, diamG, andG.

(11)

We set fori=0, 1, 2,. . .that ri= tq

t+ 1θi, si= θ1

θi+11. (3.44)

Then by (3.43), it is trivial to establish the following iterative relation:

Iri,si

Mc9ρn(1θ)θi mIri1,si1

θ

for everyiN, (3.45) wherec9depends only onn,q,p,t, andτ.

Using this recurrent relation, we obtain that for everyiN, Iri,si

Mc9+ 11/(1θ)θS m(diamG+ 1)nρnIr0,s0

θi

, (3.46)

whereSis a positive constant depending only onn,q,t, andτ.

Now, we assume that meas

xB

y,4

3ρ

:ul(x)ω1,l+ω2,l

2

1 2measB

y,4

3ρ

. (3.47)

We observe that ifxB(y, (4/3)ρ) satisfiesul(x)1,l+ω2,l)/2, thenF1,l(x)4e, so by [11, Lemma 4], we deduce

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

lgF1,l

r0

dxn+ cρr0

2eωl

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

|α|=1

DαullgF1,l

r01

F1,l

dx,

(3.48) wherecdepends only onn.

Then, using Young’s inequality, we get

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

lgF1,lr0dxcr0ρn+r0

cr0ρ 2eωl

r0

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

|α|=1

Dαul r0

F1,lr0dx. (3.49) Last inequality, using H¨older’s inequality and (3.33), gives

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

lgF1,lr0

dxcr0ρn+r0 cr0r0

2r01c7(q+ 1)nt/(t+1)ρr0

×

B(y,2ρ)ψdx

t/(t+1)

B(y,2ρ)

1 ν

t

dx 1/(t+1)

.

(3.50)

Observe that due to (3.42) andHypothesis 3.1,

B(y,2ρ)ψdx

t/(t+1)

B(y,2ρ)

1 ν

t

dx 1/(t+1)

c10(1 +Mnr0, (3.51) wherec10depends only on measure of the unit ball inRn.

(12)

Consequently, from (3.50), we obtain

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

lgF1,lr0dx c10(1 +M)r0

cr0

r0

2r01c7(q+ 1)nt/(t+1)+cr0

!ρn. (3.52)

Taking into account that Ir0,s0

B(y,(4/3)ρ)

lgF1,lr0dx, (3.53)

from (3.46) we get

Iri,si c11

θi

, for everyiN. (3.54)

Last inequality allow us to conclude that

B(y,ρ)ess supF1,l(x) 1 +c11

, (3.55)

and so

oscul,B(y,ρ)

12e1c11ωl+ρa. (3.56) Recall that we proved (3.11) under assumption (3.47). If (3.47) is not true, we take instead ofF1,lthe functionF2,lRnsuch thatF2,l=2eωl2,lul+ρa)1inB(y, 2ρ), and arguing as above, we establish (3.11) again.

It is important to observe that the positive constantc11depends only onc1,c2,c,c,c0, c,n,q,p,t,1/νLt(Ω),MG,σ, diamG, andG, and is independent oflN.

Now from (3.11), taking into account [12, Chapter 2, Lemma 4.8], we deduce that there exist positive constantCandλ(<1) depending onc11 andabut independent of lNsuch that

oscul,B(y,ρ)Cdy,∂Gλρλ, for everyρ

0,dy,∂G. (3.57) This and (3.8) imply that

oscu,B(y,ρ)Cdy,∂Gλρλ, for everyρ

0,dy,∂G. (3.58)

The proof is complete.

4. An example

LetΩ= {xRn:|x|<1}, 0< γ <min(qn/q,q/2), and letν,μbe the restriction in Ω\ {0}of real functions

|x|γ, |x|2pγ/q. (4.1)

参照

関連したドキュメント

Zhang; Existence and concentration of solutions for sublinear fourth- order elliptic equations, Electron.. Zhang; Sign-changing solutions for fourth order elliptic equations

In this case the Kirchhoff function is possibly degenerate and multiplies lower order terms rather than the leading fourth order term.. Wang

Xu; The inverse problem for linear elliptic systems of first order with Riemann-Hilbert type map in multiply connected domains, Complex Variables and Elliptic Equations, 54

In this article we establish the existence of higher order weak derivatives of weak solutions of Dirichlet problem for a class of degenerate elliptic equations.. Keywords:

Lair and Shaker [10] proved the existence of large solutions in bounded domains and entire large solutions in R N for g(x,u) = p(x)f (u), allowing p to be zero on large parts of Ω..

Lair and Shaker [10] proved the existence of large solutions in bounded domains and entire large solutions in R N for g(x,u) = p(x)f (u), allowing p to be zero on large parts of Ω..

Lair and Shaker [10] proved the existence of large solutions in bounded domains and entire large solutions in R N for g(x,u) = p(x)f (u), allowing p to be zero on large parts of Ω..

It is well known (see [2]) that, in the case of linear elliptic systems with con- tinuous coefficients A αβ ij , the gradient of weak solutions has the L 2,λ -regularity and, if