• 検索結果がありません。

We denote with T2 the class of the univalent functions that satisfy the condition zf2f2(z)0(z) −1 &lt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "We denote with T2 the class of the univalent functions that satisfy the condition zf2f2(z)0(z) −1 &lt"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

THE UNIVALENT CONDITION FOR AN INTEGRAL OPERATOR

ON THE CLASSES S(α) AND T2

Daniel Breaz and Nicoleta Breaz

Abstract.In this paper we present a few conditions of univalency for the operatorFα,β on the classes of the univalent functions S(p) and T2. These are actually generalizations(extensions) of certain results published in the paper [1].

AMS 2000 Subject Classification: 30C45.

Keywords and phrases: Unit disk, analytical function, univalent func- tion,integral operator.

1.Introduction

Let be the class of analytical functions,A ={f :f =z+a2z2+...}, z ∈U, whereU is the unit disk ,U ={z :|z|<1}and denoteS the class of univalent functions in the unit disk.

Let p the real number with the property 0 < p ≤ 2. We define the class S(p) as the class of the functions f ∈A, that satisfy the conditions f(z)6= 0 and (z/f (z))00≤p, z∈U and iff ∈S(p) then the following property is true

z2f0(z)

f2(z) −1≤p|z|2, z ∈U, relation proved in [3].

We denote with T2 the class of the univalent functions that satisfy the condition zf2f2(z)0(z) −1 < 1, z ∈ U, and also have the property f00(0) = 0.

These functions have the formf =z+a3z3+a4z4+....For 0< µ <1 we have a subclass of functions denoted by Tµ,2, containing the functions f ∈T2 that satisfy the property zf2f2(z)0(z) −1< µ <1, z ∈U.

Next we present a few well known results related to these classes, results on which shall rely in this paper.

(2)

The Schwartz Lemma. Let the analytic function g be regular in the unit disc U and g(0) = 0. If |g(z)| ≤1,∀z ∈U, then

|g(z)| ≤ |z|,∀z ∈U (1)

and equality holds only if g(z) =εz, where |ε|= 1.

Theorem 1.[2]. Let α∈C,Reα >0 and f ∈A. If 1− |z|2Reα

Reα

zf00(z) f0(z)

≤1,∀z ∈U (2)

then ∀β ∈,Reβ ≥Reα, the function

Fβ(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1f0(t)dt

1/β

(3) is univalent.

Theorem 2.[1]. Let fi∈T2, fi(z) = z+ai3z3+ai4z4+...,∀i= 1,2, so that α, β ∈C,Reα≥ 6

|α|, Reβ ≥Reα. (4)

If |fi(z)| ≤1,∀z ∈U, i= 1,2 then ∀β ∈C the function

Fα,β(z) =

β

Zz

0

tβ−1 f1(t) t

!α1

· f2(t) t

!α1

dt

1 β

∈S. (5)

Theorem 3.[1]. Letfi∈T2,µ, fi(z) = z+ai3z3+ai4z4+...,∀i= 1,2,so that α, β ∈C,Reα≥ 2 (µ+ 2)

|α| , Reβ ≥Reα. (6)

If |fi(z)| ≤1,∀z ∈U, i= 1,2 then ∀β ∈C the function

Fα,β(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1 f1(t) t

!α1

· f2(t) t

!α1

dt

1 β

∈S. (7)

Theorem 4.[1]. Letfi∈S(p),0< p <2, fi(z) = z+ai3z3+ai4z4+...,∀i= 1,2, so that

(3)

α, β ∈C,Reα ≥ 2 (p+ 2)

|α| , Reβ ≥Reα. (8)

If |fi(z)| ≤1,∀z ∈U, i= 1,2 then ∀β ∈C the function

Fα,β(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1 f1(t) t

!1

α

· f2(t) t

!1

α

dt

1 β

∈S. (9)

2.Main results

Theorem 5. Let M ≥1,fi∈T2, fi(z) =z+ai3z3+ai4z4+...,∀i = 1,2, so that

α, β ∈C,Reα≥ (4M+ 2)

|α| , Reβ ≥Reα. (10)

If |fi(z)| ≤M,∀z ∈U, i= 1,2 then ∀β∈C the function

Fα,β(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1 f1(t) t

!1

α

· f2(t) t

!1

α

dt

1 β

∈S. (11)

Proof.

We consider the function h(z) =Rz

0

f

1(t) t

α1

·f2t(t)

1 α dt.

We observe that h(0) =h0(0)−1 = 0.

By calculating the derivatives of the order I and II for this function we obtain:

h0(z) = f1(t) t

!1

α

· f2(t) t

!1

α

(12) respectively

h00(z) = 1

αh0(z)·B1+ 1

αh0(z)·B2 (13)

where

(4)

Bk= z fk(z)

!

· zfk0 (z)−fk(z)

z2 , k = 1,2. (14)

We calculate the fraction zhh000(z)(z) and we obtain:

zh00(z) h0(z) =

α1h0(z)· P2

k=1

Bk

h0(z) =z· 1 α ·

2

X

k=1

Bk,∀z ∈U. (15) Replacing Bk, k= 1,2, in formula (15) we obtain:

zh00(z) h0(z) = 1

α

zf10(z) f1(z) −1

!

+ 1 α

zf20(z) f2(z) −1

!

. (16)

We evaluate the modulus and we multiply in both terms of the relation (16) with 1−|z|Reα2Reα, obtain:

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Reα

|α|Reα

2

X

i=1

z2fi0(z) fi2(z)

|fi(z)|

|z| + 1

!

. (17)

Because |fi(z)| ≤ M,∀z ∈ U ,∀i= 1,2 and applying Schwarz Lemma we obtain that

|fi(z)|

|z| ≤M,∀z ∈U,∀i= 1,2. (18) We apply this relation in the above inequality and we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Reα

|α|Reα

2

X

i=1

z2fi0(z) fi2(z)

M + 1

!

. (19)

But

z2fi0(z) fi2(z)

=

z2fi0(z)

fi2(z) −1 + 1

z2fi0(z) fi2(z) −1

+ 1,∀z∈U,∀i= 1,2. (20)

Because f ∈T2, so zf2f2(z)0(z) −1<1.

Applying this property and (20) in (19), obtain that:

(5)

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

1− |z|2Reα(4M + 2)

|α|Reα ≤ (4M + 2)

|α|Reα ,∀z ∈U. (21) Because Reα > (4M|α|+2),we obtain that

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤1,∀z ∈U. (22)

Applying Theorem 1 we obtain that Fα,β ∈S.

Remark. Theorem 5 is a generalization of the Theorem 2.

Theorem 6. Let M ≥1, fi∈T2,µ, fi(z) = z+ai3z3 +ai4z4+...,∀i = 1,2, so that

α, β ∈C,Reα≥ 2 (µM +M+ 1)

|α| , Reβ ≥Reα. (23)

If |fi(z)| ≤M,∀z ∈U, i= 1,2 then ∀β∈C the function

Fα,β(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1 f1(t) t

!1

α

· f2(t) t

!1

α

dt

1 β

∈S. (24)

Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Reα

|α|Reα

2

X

i=1

z2fi0(z) fi2(z) −1

M +M + 1

!

. (25)

But f ∈T2,µ, which implies that zf2f2(z)0(z) −1< µ,∀z∈U.

In these conditions we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 2 (µM+M + 1)

|α|Reα ,∀z∈U. (26) By applying the relation (23) we obtain that 1−|z|Reγ2Reγ zhh000(z)(z)

≤1,∀z ∈U.

(6)

So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.

Remark. Theorem 6 is a generalization of the Theorem 3.

Theorem 7. Let M ≥ 1, fi∈S(p),0 < p < 2, fi(z) = z+ai3z3 +ai4z4 + ...,∀i= 1,2, so that

α, β ∈C,Reα≥ 2 (pM +M+ 1)

|α| , Reβ ≥Reα. (27)

If |fi(z)| ≤M,∀z ∈U, i= 1,2 then ∀β∈C the function

Fα,β(z) =

β

z

Z

0

tβ−1 f1(t) t

!α1

· f2(t) t

!α1

dt

1 β

∈S. (28)

Proof. Considering the same steps as in the above proof we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Reα

|α|Reα

2

X

i=1

z2fi0(z) fi2(z) −1

M +M + 1

!

. (29)

But f ∈S(p), so

z2f0(z) f2(z) −1

≤p|z|2,∀z ∈U. (30) In these conditions we obtain:

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 1− |z|2Reα

|α|Reα

2

X

i=1

p|z|2M +M + 1,∀z ∈U, (31) so,

1− |z|2Reα Reα

zh00(z) h0(z)

≤ 2 (pM +M + 1)

|α|Reα . (32)

By applying in (32) the relation (27) we obtain that 1−|z|Reγ2Reγ zhh000(z)(z)

≤ 1,∀z ∈U.

(7)

So according to the Theorem 1 the function Fα,β is univalent.

Remark. Theorem 7 is a generalization of the Theorem 4.

References

[1] Breaz, D.,Breaz, N., The univalent conditions for an integral operator on the classes S(p) and T2, Preprint,2004.

[2] Pascu, N.N.,An improvement of Becker’s univalence criterion, Proceed- ings of the Commemorative Session Simion Stoilow, Brasov, (1987), 43-48.

[3] Singh, V., On class of univalent functions, Internat. J. Math &Math.

Sci. 23(2000), 12, 855-857. [4] Yang, D., Liu, J., On a class of univalent functions, Internat. J. Math &Math. Sci. 22(1999), 3, 605-610.

D. Breaz:

Department of Mathematics

”‘1 Decembrie 1918”’ University of Alba Iulia

Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 11-13, 510009, Romania E-mail address: [email protected]

N. Breaz:

Department of Mathematics

”‘1 Decembrie 1918”’ University of Alba Iulia

Alba Iulia, str. N. Iorga, No. 11-13, 510009, Romania E-mail address: [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Analytic, p-valent; starlikeness; convexity; Hadamard product (convolution)... In [3] Dziok and Raina extended the linear operator by using Wright’s generalized

As a result of this computer-based market analysis, the following findings were made: 1 improvements in the forecast accuracy of fundamentalists can contribute to an increase in

In the present paper, we investigate several inclusion relationships and other in- teresting properties of certain subclasses of meromorphically multivalent functions which are

We list in Table 1 examples of elliptic curves with minimal discriminant achieving growth to each possible torsion group over Q

Obradovi´c, Starlikeness and certain class of rational functions, Math.. Radomir, A class of univalent

YANG, Some further results on the zeros and growths of entire solutions of second order linear differential equations, Kodai Math.. WANG, The possible orders of solutions of linear

In this paper we derive subordination results for certain subclass of analytic functions defined by using Salagean operator.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

In this paper we derive several subordination results for certain new classes of analytic functions defined by using Salagean operator.. (1.2) Definition 1 (Hadamard Product