• 検索結果がありません。

Memoirs on Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics Volume 57, 2012, 51–74

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Memoirs on Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics Volume 57, 2012, 51–74"

Copied!
24
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Memoirs on Differential Equations and Mathematical Physics

Volume 57, 2012, 51–74

Liliya Koltsova and Alexander Kostin

THE ASYMPTOTIC BEHAVIOR

OF SOLUTIONS OF MONOTONE TYPE OF FIRST-ORDER NONLINEAR

ORDINARY DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS,

UNRESOLVED FOR THE DERIVATIVE

(2)

Abstract. For the first-order nonlinear ordinary differential equation F(t, y, y0) =

Xn

k=1

pk(t)yαk(y0)βk = 0,

unresolved for the derivative, asymptotic behavior of solutions of monotone type is established fort→+∞.

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 34D05, 34E10.

Key words and phrases. Nonlinear differential equations, monotone solutions, asymptotic properties.

æØ . غ ªŁ æŁ ß Øº æŁ Ø Ø Øºæ Œ Ł ª Ł

ß ª łª æŁ ª Æ Œø Łæ Œ ºŁ غŒº-

ºŒæ غŒ Œ Ø º æ ª .

(3)

This article describes a first-order real ordinary differential equation:

F(t, y, y0) = Xn k=1

pk(t)yαk(y0)βk = 0, (1) (t, y, y0) D, D = ∆(a)×R1×R2, ∆(a) = [a; +∞[, a > 0, R1 = R+, R2 = RR+; pk(t) C∆(a) (k = 1, n, n 2); αk, βk 0 (k = 1, n),

Pn k=1

βk6= 0.

Further, we assume that all the expressions, appearing in the equation, make sense; and all functions we consider in the present paper are real.

We investigate the question on the existence and on the asymptotic be- havior (as t +∞) of unboundedly continuable to the right solutions (R-solutions) y(t) of equation (1) and derivatives y0(t) of these solutions which possess the following properties:

A) 0< y(t)∈C1∆(t

1), ∆(t1)∆(a), wheret1 is defined in the course of proving each theorem;

B) among the summands pk(t)(y(t))αk(y0(t))βk (k = 1, n), the terms with numbersi= 1, s(2≤s≤n) are asymptotically principal for the givenR-solutiony(t), i.e., there exist:

t→+∞lim

pi(t)(y(t))αi(y0(t))βi

p1(t)(y(t))α1(y0(t))β1 6= 0, ±∞ (i= 1, s),

t→+∞lim

pj(t)(y(t))αj(y0(t))βj

p1(t)(y(t))α1(y0(t))β1 = 0 (j =s+ 1, n).

It is obvious thatpi(t)6= 0 (i= 1, s).

Lemma 1. Let the equation

Fe(t, ξ, η) = 0, (2)

(t, ξ, η)∈D1,D1= ∆(a)×[−h1;h1]×[−h2;h2], hk R+(k= 1,2),satisfy the conditions:

1) Fe(t, ξ, η)∈Cst ξ η1s2s3(D1), s1, s2, s3∈ {0,1,2, . . .}, s2≥1, s32;

2) ∃F(+∞,e 0,0) = 0;

3) ∃Fe0η(+∞,0,0) =A1R\ {0};

4) sup

D1

|Fe00ηη(t, ξ, η)|=A2R+.

Then in some domainD2= ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1]×[−eh2;eh2], wheret0≥a, 0 <eh1 ≤h1, 0 <eh2 < min©

h2;|A4A1|

2

ª, the equation (2) defines a unique function η=η(t, ξ),e such that eη(t, ξ)∈Cst ξ1s2(D3), D3= ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1],

eη(+∞,0) = 0,Fe(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))≡0.Moreover, forξ= 0, the functionη(t, ξ)e

(4)

has the property

e

η(t,0)∼ − Fe(t,0,0)

Fe0η(t,0,0). (3)

Proof. Let us expand the functionFe(t, ξ, η) with respect to the variable η for t ∆(a), ξ [−h1;h1] by using the Maclaurin’s formula. Then the equation (2) can be written as:

Fe(t, ξ, η) =Fe(t, ξ,0) +Fe0η(t, ξ,0)η+R(t, ξ, η) = 0. (4) Obviously,

R(t, ξ,0)0.

The equation (4) is equivalent to the implicit equation η(t, ξ) =−Fe(t, ξ,0)−R(t, ξ, η(t, ξ))

Fe0η(t, ξ,0) , (5)

where

R(t, ξ, η) =Fe(t, ξ, η)−Fe(t, ξ,0)−Fe0η(t, ξ,0)η, and, therefore,

R0η(t, ξ, η) =Fe0η(t, ξ, η)−Fe0η(t, ξ,0).

Applying the Lagrange’s theorem with respect to the variable η to the right-hand side of the above equation, we get:

Fe0η(t, ξ, η2)−Fe0η(t, ξ, η1) =Fe00ηη(t, ξ, η)(η2−η1), η1;η2[, sup

D1

¯¯ eF0η(t, ξ, η2)−Fe0η(t, ξ, η1

¯

sup

D1

¯¯ eF00ηη(t, ξ, η)¯

¯2−η1|=A22−η1|.

Assumingη1= 0, η2=η,we obtain:

sup

D1

¯¯R0η(t, ξ, η)¯

¯≤A2|η|.

We consider and evaluate also the difference R(t, ξ, η2) −R(t, ξ, η1), (t, ξ, ηi) D1 (i = 1,2), applying the Lagrange’s theorem with respect to the variableη:

R(t, ξ, η2)−R(t, ξ, η1) =R0η(t, ξ, η∗∗)(η2−η1), η∗∗1;η2[, sup

D1

¯¯R(t, ξ, η2)−R(t, ξ, η1

¯sup

D1

¯¯R0η(t, ξ, η)¯

¯2−η1| ≤A22−η1|2. Assumingη1= 0, η2=η,we get

sup

D1

|R(t, ξ, η)| ≤A2|η|2. Consider the domainD2⊂D1in which

1) sup

D2

|Fe(t, ξ,0)| ≤eh2|A41|;

(5)

2) inf

D2

|Fe0η(t, ξ,0)|>|A21|; 3) sup

D2

|R(t, ξ, η)| ≤A2|η|2≤A2eh22.

The fulfilment of conditions 1), 2) can be achieved by increasingt0 and reducingeh1 (by virtue of the conditions of the Lemma). The fulfilment of condition 3) is obvious.

To the equation (5) we put into the correspondence the operator η(t, ξ) =T(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))≡ −F(t, ξ,e 0)−R(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))

Fe0η(t, ξ,0) , where η(t, ξ)e ∈B1⊂B, B

e

η(t, ξ) : η(t, ξ)e Cst ξ1s2(D3), eη(+∞,0) = 0, keη(t, ξ)k = sup

D3

|eη(t, ξ)|ª

is the Banach space, B1=© e

η(t, ξ) : eη(t, ξ)∈ B, keη(t, ξ)k ≤eh2

ªis a closed subset of the Banach spaceB.

We apply here the principle of contractive mappings.

1) Let us prove that if eη(t, ξ)∈ B1, then η(t, ξ) =T(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e B1: e

η(t, ξ)∈Cst ξ1s2(D3) andη(+∞,e 0) = 0,then by virtue of the structure of the operator, we get

η(t, ξ)∈Cst ξ1s2(D3), η(+∞,0) = 0;

keη(t, ξ)k ≤eh2=⇒ kη(t, ξ)k

°T(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e °

°=

=

°°

°−Fe(t, ξ,0)−R(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e Fe0η(t, ξ,0)

°°

°

1

infD2

|Fe0η(t, ξ, η)|

³ sup

D2

|Fe(t, ξ,0)|+ sup

D2

|R(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))|´

2

|A1t|

³ sup

D2

|Fe(t, ξ,0)|+A2eh22

´

eh2

2 +eh2

2 eh2. 2) Let us check the condition of contraction:

e

η1(t, ξ),ηe2(t, ξ)∈B1=°

°η2(t, ξ)−η1(t, ξ)°

°=

=

°°

°R(t, ξ,eη2(t, ξ))−R(t, ξ,ηe1(t, ξ)) Fe0η(t, ξ,0)

°°

°

A2

infD2

|Fe0η(t, ξ, η)|

°°eη2(t, ξ)−ηe1(t, ξ)°

°2

2A2

|A1|

³

keη2(t, ξ)k+e1(t, ξ)k´°

°eη2(t, ξ)−ηe1(t, ξ)°

°

4A2eh2

|A1|

°°eη2(t, ξ)−ηe1(t, ξ)°

°=γ°

°eη2(t, ξ)eη1(t, ξ)°

°, whereγ= 4A|A2eh2

1| <1.

(6)

As a result, we have found that by the contractive mapping principle the equation (5) admits a unique solutionη=eη(t, ξ)∈B1.

Since F(t, ξ, η)e Cst ξ η1s2s3(D1), then by a local theorem on the differen- tiability of an implicit function, it can be stated thateη(t, ξ)∈Cst ξ1s2(D3).

Let us prove thateη(t, ξ) has the property (3) forξ= 0.

The functionη(t, ξ)e D3 satisfies the equation (4), which can be writ- ten as

Fe(t,0,0) +Fe0η(t,0,0)eη(t,0) +O(eη2)0, (6) assumingξ= 0.

As O(eη2) =O(1)eη2 =o(1)eη,then the equation (6) is equivalent to the equation

Fe(t,0,0) +Fe0η(t,0,0)eη(t,0) +o(1)eη(t,0)0.

Hence, taking into account that Fe0η(+∞,0,0) =A1 R\ {0}, we can write

e η(t,0)

³

1 + o(1) Fe0η(t,0,0)

´

= Fe(t,0,0)

Fe0η(t,0,0). (7) The property (3) follows from the equality (7). ¤ Lemma 2([2]). Let the differential equation

ξ0=α(t)f(t, ξ), (8)

(t, ξ)∈D3,D3= ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1] (eh1R+), satisfy the conditions:

1) 06=α(t)∈C(∆(t0)), +∞R

t0

α(t)dt=±∞;

2) f(t, ξ)C01(D3),∃f(+∞,0) = 0,∃fξ0(+∞,0)6= 0;

3) fξ0(t, ξ)⇒fξ0(t,0)under ξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0).

Then there existst1≥t0,such that the equation(8)has a non-empty set of o-solutions

Ω =©

ξ(t)∈C1∆(t1): ξ(+∞) = 0ª , where

a) if sign(αfξ0(+∞,0)) = −1, thenis a one-parametric family of o-solutions of the equation(8);

b) ifsign(αfξ0(+∞,0)) = 1, thenΩcontains a unique element.

The Existence and Asymptotics of R-Solutions of the Equation(1) with the Condition y(+∞) = 0∨+∞

The supposed asymptotics (to within a constant factor) of R-solution y(t) with the condition y(+∞) = 0∨+∞ can be found from the ratio of the first two summands (we consider all possible cases with respect to the values of parametersα1, α2, β1, β2). Taking into account thatp1(t), p2(t)6=0

(7)

(t ∆(a)), we find that y(t) ˙∼v(t) > 0 (v ∈ {vi}, i = 1,4) under the condition thatv(+∞) = 0∨+∞:

1) v1 = ¯

¯p1(t)

p2(t)

¯¯α2−α1 11 6= α2, β1 = β2), moreover, p1(t), p2(t) C1∆(a).

In all the rest asymptotics is used the function I(A, t) =

Zt

A

¯¯

¯p1(t) p2(t)

¯¯

¯

1 β2−β1

dt, A=

(a (I(a,+∞) = +∞), +∞ (I(a,+∞)R+∪ {0}).

2) v2=|I(A, t)|1=α2, β16=β2).

3) v3=|I(A, t)|(αβ22−α−β11+1)−116=α2, β16=β2, α116=α22).

4) v4 =e`0|I(a,t)| (`0 R\ {0}and satisfies the conditions (13),(14), (16);α16=α2, β16=β2, α1+β1=α2+β26= 0;I(a,+∞) = +∞).

A solution is sought in the form

y(t) =v(t)(`+ξ(t)), (9)

where `∈R+; ξ(t)∈C1∆(a), ξ(+∞) = 0; v(t) =vk(t)C1∆(a) (k is fixed, k= 1,4).

Differentiating the equation (9), we obtain:

y0(t) =v0(t)(`+ξ(t)) +v(t)ξ0(t) =v0(t)

³

`+ξ(t) + v(t) v0(t)ξ0(t)

´ . Having denoted

ξ(t) + v(t)

v0(t)ξ0(t) =η(t), (10) η(t)∈C∆(a), we get

y0(t) =v0(t)(`+η(t)). (11) The conditiony0(t)∼`v0(t) requires the assumption thatη(+∞) = 0.

Substituting (9) and (11) into the equation (1), we obtain the equality F(t, v(`+ξ), v0(`+η)) =

= Xn k=1

pk(t)(v)αk(`+ξ)αk(v0)βk(`+η)βk= 0, (12) which is satisfied by the functions ξ(t), η(t) and (v0(t))βk : ∆(a) R2

(k= 1, n).

fi˙fj(i6=j) means that lim

t→+∞

fi

fj 6= 0,±∞.

(8)

According to the condition B), indicated in the statement of the problem, we assume that

pi(t)(v(t))αi(v0(t))βi p1(t)(v(t))α1(v0(t))β1 =

=ci +εi(t), ci R\ {0}, εi(+∞) = 0 (i= 1, s); (13) pj(t)(v(t))αj(v0(t))βj

p1(t)(v(t))α1(v0(t))β1 =εj(t), εj(+∞) = 0 (j=s+ 1, n). (14) Then, after the division byp1(t)(v(t))α1(v0(t))β1,the equation (12) takes the form

Fe(t, ξ, η) = Xs

i=1

(ci +εi(t))(`+ξ)αi(`+η)βi+

+ Xn j=s+1

εj(t)(`+ξ)αj(`+η)βj = 0. (15) Obviously, the condition F(+∞,e 0,0) = 0 is necessary for the existence of a solution and of its derivative of the form (9),(11),respectively.

Thus, forv=vk(t) (k= 1,4) it takes the form Xs

i=1

ci`αii= 0. (16)

Forv=v4(t) : sign(v0) = sign(`0), ci =ci(`0), `0, `β0i R\{0}(i= 1, s).

By virtue of its structure, the functions F(t, ξ, η)e C0∞∞t ξ η (D1), ∂ξnFne,

mFe

∂ηm, ∂ξn+mn∂ηFme (n = 1,∞, m = 1,∞) are bounded in D1, where D1 =

∆(a)×[−h1;h1]×[−h2;h2],0< hk < `(k= 1,2).

Next, we will need expressions for the first and second order derivatives of the functionFe(t, ξ, η) with respect to the variablesξandη:

Fe0ξ(t, ξ, η) = Xs i=1

αici(`+ξ)αi−1(`+η)βi+ +

Xn

k=1

αkεk(t)(`+ξ)αk−1(`+η)βk, Fe0η(t, ξ, η) =

Xs i=1

βici(`+ξ)αi(`+η)βi−1+

+ Xn

k=1

βkεk(t)(`+ξ)αk(`+η)βk−1, Fe00ξξ(t, ξ, η) =

Xs i=1

αii1)ci(`+ξ)αi−2(`+η)βi+

(9)

+ Xn

k=1

αkk1)εk(t)(`+ξ)αk−2(`+η)βk, Fe00ξη(t, ξ, η) =Fe00ηξ(t, ξ, η) =

Xs i=1

αiβici(`+ξ)αi−1(`+η)βi−1+

+ Xn

k=1

αkβkεk(t)(`+ξ)αk−1(`+η)βk−1, Fe00ηη(t, ξ, η) =

Xs

i=1

βii1)ci(`+ξ)αi(`+η)βi−2+

+ Xn

k=1

βkk1)εk(t)(`+ξ)αk(`+η)βk−2, as well as the following notation:

ψ00(t) = Xn

k=1

`αkkεk(t),

ψl0(t) = Xn

k=1

αkk1)· · ·k−l+ 1)εk(t)`αkk,

ψ0m(t) = Xn

k=1

βkk1)· · ·k−m+ 1)εk(t)`αkk,

ψlm(t) = Xn k=1

αkk1)· · ·k−l+ 1)×

×βkk1)· · ·k−m+ 1)εk(t)`αkk, Sl0=

Xs

i=1

αii1)· · ·i−l+ 1)ci`αii,

S0m= Xs i=1

βii1)· · ·i−m+ 1)ci`αii,

Slm= Xs i=1

αii1)· · ·i−l+ 1)×

×βii1)· · ·i−m+ 1)ci`αii,

Sl0, S0m, Slm∈R (l, mN), S=S102S02−2S10S01S11+S012 S20, λ1= 2S301

S R, λ2=2S201`2

S R.

Theorem 1. Let a functionv(t) =vk(t) (k= 1,4)be a possible asymp- totics of an R-solution of the equation (1), which satisfies the conditions v(+∞) = 0∨+∞,(13),and(14). Let, moreover, there exist`∈R+,satis- fying the condition(16).

(10)

Then in order for theR-solutiony(t)∈C1∆(t1)of the differential equation (1)with the asymptotic properties

y(t)∼`v(t), y0(t)∼`v0(t), (17) to exist, it is sufficient that the two following conditions

S016= 0, (18)

S10+S016= 0. (19) be fulfilled. Moreover, if sign¡v0(S10+S01)

S01

¢ = 1, then there exists a one- parameter set of R-solutions with the asymptotic properties (17); if sign¡v0(S10+S01)

S01

¢=−1, thenR-solution with the asymptotic(17)is unique.

Proof. For the proof we will need the following properties of the function Fe(t, ξ, η) :

Fe0ξ(+∞,0,0) = S10

` ; Fe0η(+∞,0,0) = S01

` 6= 0 by virtue of the condition (18).

Owing to the conditions (16),(18) and to the properties of the function Fe(t, ξ, η), in some domain D2 D1, D2 = ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1]×[−eh2;eh2], t0 ≥a,0 <eh1 ≤h1, 0<eh2<minn

h2; |S01|

4`sup

D1

|Fe00ηη(t,ξ,η)|

o

, for the equation (15) the conditions of Lemma 1 are satisfied. Consequently, there exists a unique functionη=η(t, ξ)e C0∞t ξ (D3), D3= ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1],sup

D3

¯¯neη

∂ξn

¯¯<

+∞(n= 1,∞),such thatFe(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e 0,η(+∞,e 0) = 0,keη(t, ξ)k ≤eh2. Moreover, we can write

∂η(t, ξ)e

∂ξ =−Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η)e Fe0η(t, ξ,η)e .

Thus, in view of the replacement (10),we obtain the differential equation with respect toξ:

ξ0= v0 v

¡−ξ+eη(t, ξ)¢

. (20)

The question on the existence of solutions of the form (9) reduces to the study of the differential equation (20).

Let us show that the conditions 1)–3) of Lemma 2 are satisfied for the equation (20). In this case we have: α(t) =vv(t)0(t),f(t, ξ) =−ξ+η(t, ξ).e

Obviously, the conditions 1) and 2) are satisfied.

1) Since 0< v(t)∈C1(∆(a)), therefore 06=α(t)∈C(∆(t0)),

Z+∞

t0

α(t)dt=

+∞Z

t0

v0(t)

v(t) dt=±∞.

(11)

2) Sinceη(t, ξ)e C0∞t ξ (D3), then

f(t, ξ)C0∞t ξ(D3), ∃f(+∞,0) =η(+∞,e 0) = 0, fξ0(t, ξ) =−1 +ηe0ξ(t, ξ) =−1−Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η)e

Fe0η(t, ξ,η)e , fξ0(+∞,0) =−1−Fe0ξ(+∞,0,η(+∞,e 0))

Fe0η(+∞,0,η(+∞,e 0)) =−S10+S01

S01 6= 0 by virtue of the condition (19).

Let us check that the condition 3) is satisfied, that is,

°°fξ0(t, ξ)−fξ0(t,0)°

°=

°°

°°

Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e

Fe0η(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))− Fe0ξ(t,0,η(t,e 0)) Fe0η(t,0,eη(t,0))

°°

°°−→−→0 asξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0).

Towards this end, it suffices to verify that the following properties are satisfied:

31)η(t, ξ)e ⇒η(t,e 0) ifξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0), 32)Fe0ξ(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))Fe0ξ(t,0,η(t,e 0)) asξ→0 uniformly with respect to t∈∆(t0),

33) Fe0η(t, ξ,eη(t, ξ))Fe0η(t,0,η(t,e 0)), as ξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0) with regard for the fact thatFη0(+∞,0, η(+∞,0)) =S016= 0.

Let us estimate the differences η(t, ξ)e η(t,e 0), Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e Fe0ξ(t,0,eη(t,0)), Fe0η(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e −Fe0η(t,0,η(t,e 0)), applying the Lagrange’s theorem to the first difference with respect to the variableξ:

e

η(t, ξ)−eη(t,0) =eη0ξ(t, ξ)ξ, ξ]0;ξ[.

As the functionsεk(t) (k= 1, n) are bounded in ∆(a) andkeη(t, ξ)k ≤eh2

inD3, then we get the estimates in the form:

31) ¯

¯eη(t, ξ)−η(t,e 0)¯

¯=¯

¯eη0ξ(t, ξ

¯|ξ|=

=

¯¯

¯−Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η(t, ξe )) Fe0η(t, ξ,η(t, ξe ))

¯¯

¯|ξ| ≤O(1)|ξ|=O(ξ)−→0 asξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0);

32) taking into account that (`+ξ)αi−1→`αi−1asξ→0,(`+eη(t, ξ))βi (`+η(t,e 0))βi asξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0) (i= 1, s),we get

¯¯ eF0ξ(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e −Fe0ξ(t,0,η(t,e 0))¯

¯=

=

¯¯

¯¯ Xs

i=1

αicih

(`+ξ)αi−1(`+eη(t, ξ))βi−`αi−1(`+η(t,e 0))βii +

+ Xn

k=1

αkεk(t) h

(`+ξ)αk−1(`+η(t, ξ))e βk−`αk−1(`+η(t,e 0))βki¯¯

¯¯−→0

(12)

asξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0);

33) analogously to 32), we get:

¯¯

¯ eF0η(t, ξ,η(t, ξ))e −Fe0η(t,0,η(t,e 0))

¯¯

¯=

=

¯¯

¯¯ Xs

i=1

βicih

(`+ξ)αi(`+η(t, ξ))e βi−1−`αi(`+η(t,e 0))βi−1i +

+ Xn

k=1

βkεk(t) h

(`+ξ)αk(`+η(t, ξ))e βk−1−`αk(`+η(t,e 0))βk−1i¯¯

¯¯−→0 asξ→0 uniformly with respect tot∈∆(t0).

Sinceη(+∞,e 0) = 0, thereforeFη0(+∞,0,eη(+∞,0)) =S016= 0 by virtue of the condition (18).

Consequently, condition 3) is satisfied.

Then if sign¡v0(S10+S01)

S01

¢= 1, then there exists a one-parameter set of o-solutions of the equation (20) in ∆(t1)∆(t0).

If sign¡v0(S10+S01) S01

¢=−1, then a set ofo-solutions of the equation (20) in ∆(t1) contains the unique element.

Finally, having the dimension of a set ofo-solutions of the equation (20), we have obtained the dimension of a set ofR-solutions of the equation (1) with the asymptotic properties (17) in ∆(t1). ¤ Theorem 2. Let the conditions of Theorem 1, except for (19), be satis- fied, and

S6= 0, (21)

ψ00(t) ln2v(t) =o(1), (22) (ψ10(t) +ψ01(t)) lnv(t) =o(1). (23) Then there exists a one-parameter set of R-solutions y(t) C1∆(t1) of the differential equation(1)with the asymptotic properties

y(t) =v(t)(`+ξ(t)), y0(t)∼`v0(t), (24) whereξ(t)∼lnλv(t)1` .

Proof. To prove the theorem, we will need the following properties and expressions of the functionFe(t, ξ, η) :

Fe(t,0,0) =ψ00(t), Fe0ξ(t,0,0) = 1

` Xs

i=1

αici`αii+1

` Xn

k=1

αk`αkkεk(t), Fe0ξ(+∞,0,0) = S10

` ; Fe0η(t,0,0) = 1

` Xs i=1

βici`αii+1

` Xn

k=1

βk`αkkεk(t),

(13)

Fe0η(+∞,0,0) = S01

` 6= 0 by virtue of condition (18);

Fe00ξξ(t,0,0) = 1

`2 Xs i=1

αii1)ci`αii+

+ 1

`2 Xn k=1

αkk1)`αkkεk(t), Fe00ξξ(+∞,0,0) = S20

`2 ;

Fe00ξη(t,0,0) =Fe00ηξ(t,0,0) =

= 1

`2 Xs i=1

αiβici`αii+ 1

`2 Xn

k=1

αkβk`αkkεk(t), Fe00ξη(+∞,0,0) =Fe00ηξ(+∞,0,0) = S11

`2 ; Fe00ηη(t,0,0) = 1

`2 Xs i=1

βii1)ci`αii+ + 1

`2 Xn k=1

βkk1)`αkkεk(t), Fe00ηη(+∞,0,0) = S02

`2 .

By virtue of the condition (18) and owing to the properties of the function Fe(t, ξ, η), in some domain D2 D1, D2 = ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1]×[−eh2;eh2], t0 ≥a,0 <eh1 ≤h1, 0<eh2<min

n

h2;4`sup|S01|

D1

|Fe00ηη(t,ξ,η)|

o

, for the equation (15) the conditions of Lemma 1 are fulfilled. Consequently, there exists a unique function η = eη(t, ξ), η(t, ξ)e C0∞t ξ(D3), D3 = ∆(t0)×[−eh1;eh1], sup

D3

¯¯nηe

∂ξn

¯¯ <+∞ (n= 1,∞), such that F(t, ξ,e η(t, ξ))e 0, η(+∞,e 0) = 0, keη(t, ξ)k ≤eh2.Moreover, we can write:

e

η(t,0)∼ − Fe(t,0,0) Fe0η(t,0,0),

e

η0ξ(t, ξ) =−Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η)e Fe0η(t, ξ,eη),

2eη(t, ξ)

∂ξ2 =(Fe0ξ)2Fe00ηη2Fe0ξFe0ηFe00ξη+ (Fe0η)2Fe00ξξ (Fe0η)3 .

(14)

Thus, taking into account the replacement (10),we obtain the differential equation with respect toξ:

ξ0 =v0

v (−ξ+η(t, ξ)).e (20)

The question of the existence of solutions of the type (9) reduces to the study of the differential equation (20).

Let us show that the conditions 1)–3) of Lemma 2 are satisfied for the equation (20). In this case we have: α(t) =vv(t)0(t),f(t, ξ) =−ξ+η(t, ξ).e

1) Since 0< v(t)∈C1(∆(a)), therefore 06=α(t)∈C(∆(t0)),

Z+∞

t0

α(t)dt=

+∞Z

t0

v0(t)

v(t) dt=±∞.

2) Sinceη(t, ξ)e C0∞t ξ (D3), therefore

f(t, ξ)C0∞t ξ(D3), ∃f(+∞,0) =η(+∞,e 0) = 0, fξ0(t, ξ) =−1 +ηe0ξ(t, ξ) =−1−Fe0ξ(t, ξ,η)e

Fe0η(t, ξ,η)e .

Taking into account the properties of the functionsεk(t) (k= 1, n) and also the conditions of the theorem, we obtain:

fξ0(+∞,0) =−1−Fe0ξ(+∞,0,eη(+∞,0))

Fe0η(+∞,0,η(+∞,e 0)) =−S10+S01 S01 = 0.

Thus, condition 2) is not satisfied, and we cannot apply Lemma 2 to the equation (20).

Sincefξξ00(t, ξ) =ηe00ξξ(t, ξ),therefore

fξξ00(+∞,0) =eη00ξξ(+∞,0) = S

`S013 = 2 λ1`. Consider the auxiliary differential equation with respect toξ1:

ξ10 = v0(t) λ1`v(t)ξ21. and find one of its non-trivial solutions:

ξ1= λ1`

lnv(t), 06=ξ(t)1C1∆(t1) (t1≥t0), ξ1(+∞) = 0.

We consider the question on the existence in the equation (20) of solutions of the formξ=ξ1(1+ξ), wheree ξ(t)e C1∆(t

1),ξ(+∞) = 0.e For the unknown functionξewe obtain the following differential equation:

ξe0 =v0ξ1

v µ

1 ξ1

10 v0ξ12

1 ξ1

10 v0ξ12

´ξe+η(t, ξe 1(1 +ξ))e ξ21

, (25) (t,ξ)e ∈D4, D4= ∆(t1)×[−h4;h4] (0< h4eh1), vv(t)ξ0(t)ξ1012(t)(t)≡ −λ1

1`.

(15)

Let us show that the conditions 1)–3) of Lemma 2 are satisfied for the equation (25). In this case we have:

α(t) =v0(t)ξ1

v(t) = λ1`v0(t) v(t) lnv(t), f(t,ξ) =e 1

ξ1 + 1 λ1` +

³

1 ξ1 + 1

λ1`

´ξe+η(t, ξe 1(1 +ξ))e ξ21 . Using the properties of functionsv(t),η(t, ξ),e ξ1(t),we obtain:

1) 06=α(t)∈C(∆(t1)), +∞R

t1

α(t)dt=λ1`+∞R

t1

v0(t)

v(t) lnv(t)dt=∞;

2)f(t,ξ)e C0∞tξe(D4);

f(t,0) =1 ξ1

+ 1

λ1` +eη(t, ξ1) ξ21 , fξe0(t,ξ) =e 1

ξ1

+ 1

λ1` +eη0ξ(t, ξ1(1 +ξ))e ξ1

, fξe0(t,0) =1

ξ1 + 1

λ1` +eη0ξ(t, ξ1) ξ1 .

Let us expand the functions eη(t, ξ1) and ηe0ξ(t, ξ1) with respect to the variableξ1in D4 using the Maclaurin’s formula:

e

η(t, ξ1) =eη(t,0) +ηe0ξ1(t,0)ξ1+1 2eη00ξ2

1(t,0)ξ12+O(ξ13), e

η0ξ(t, ξ1) =eη0ξ(t,0) +ηe00ξξ1(t,0)ξ1+O(ξ12).

Using Lemma 1, we obtain:

e

η(t,0)∼ − 00(t) S01+o(1), e

η0ξ1(t,0) =ηe0ξ(t,0) =

= Ps i=1

αici`αi−1(`+η(t,e 0))βi+ Pn

k=1

αkεk(t)`αk−1(`+η(t,e 0))βk Ps

i=1

βici`αi(`+η(t,e 0))βi−1+ Pn

k=1

βkεk(t)`αk(`+eη(t,0))βk−1 ,

e

η0ξ1(+∞,0) =ηe0ξ(+∞,0) =−S10

S01, e

η00ξ2

1(+∞,0) =eη00ξξ1(+∞,0) =ηe00ξ2(+∞,0) = 2 λ1`. Then

f(t,0) = eη(t,0)

ξ21 +eη0ξ1(t,0)1

ξ1 +1

2eη00ξ2

1(t,0) + 1

λ1`+O(ξ1), fξe0(t,0) = eη0ξ(t,0)1

ξ1

+eη00ξξ1(t,0) + 1

λ1` +O(ξ1).

参照

関連したドキュメント

Higher-order Sobolev space, linear extension operator, boundary trace operator, complex interpolation, weighted Sobolev space, Besov space, boundary value problem, Poisson problem

Problems of a contact between finite or infinite, isotropic or anisotropic plates and an elastic inclusion are reduced to the integral differential equa- tions with Prandtl

We apply generalized Kolosov–Muskhelishvili type representation formulas and reduce the mixed boundary value problem to the system of singular integral equations with

His monographs in the field of elasticity testify the great work he made (see, for instance, [6–9]). In particular, his book Three-dimensional Prob- lems of the Mathematical Theory

In this context the Riemann–Hilbert monodromy problem in the class of Yang–Mills connections takes the following form: for a prescribed mon- odromy and a fixed finite set of points on

Analogous and related questions are investigated in [17–24] and [26] (see also references therein) for the singular two-point and multipoint boundary value problems for linear

The main goal of the present paper is the study of unilateral frictionless contact problems for hemitropic elastic material, their mathematical mod- elling as unilateral boundary

(6) It is well known that the dyadic decomposition is useful to define the product of two distributions.. Proof of Existence Results 4.1. Global existence for small initial data..