• 検索結果がありません。

Via Titu Andreescu type inequality (see [2] p

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "Via Titu Andreescu type inequality (see [2] p"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

27 (2011), 173–178 www.emis.de/journals ISSN 1786-0091

SEVERAL VARIANTS OF VIA TITU ANDREESCU TYPE AND POPOVICIU TYPE INEQUALITIES

XINKUAN CHAI AND YU MIAO

Abstract. In this paper, we will give several generalized variants of Via Titu Andreescu type and Popoviciu type inequalities.

1. Introduction

Letf be a convex function, i.e., for anyt [0,1] and anyx, y in the domain of f,

(1) f(tx+ (1−t)y)≤tf(x) + (1−t)f(y), then the following two known inequalities hold,

Via Titu Andreescu type inequality (see [2] p. 6) (2) f(x1) +f(x2) +f(x3) +f

x1+x2+x3 n

4 3

f

x1+x2 2

+f

x2+x3 2

+f

x3+x1 2

, where x1, x2, x3 lie in the domain of the convex function f.

Popoviciu type inequality (see [4]) Xn

i=1

f(xi) + n n−2f

x1+· · ·+xn n

2 n−2

X

i<j

f

xi+xj 2

, where f is a convex function on intervalI and x1, . . . , xn∈I.

Generalized Popoviciu type inequality

(n1)[f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)]≤f(a1) +· · ·+f(an) +n(n−2)f(a), where a = (a1 +· · ·+an)/n and bi = (na−ai)/(n1), i = 1, . . . , n, and a1, . . . , an∈I.

2010Mathematics Subject Classification. 26D15.

Key words and phrases. Convex functions, Jensen’s inequality, Via Titu Andreescu type inequality, Popoviciu type inequality.

173

(2)

Recently, Bougoffa [1] obtained the following variant of Via Titu Andreescu type and Popoviciu type inequalities.

Theorem B. If f is a convex function and x1, . . . , xn or a1, . . . , an lie in its domain, then the following inequalities hold,

(3) Xn

i=1

f(xi)−f

x1+· · ·+xn n

n−1

n

f

x1+x2

2

+· · ·+f

xn1+xn

2

+f

xn+x1

2

and

(4) (n1)[f(b1) +· · ·+f(bn)]≤n[f(a1) +· · ·+f(an)−f(a)], where a = (a1+· · ·+an)/n and bi = (na−ai)/(n1), i= 1, . . . , n.

The aim of the present paper is to show the more generalized inequalities in Theorem B, which are stated and proved in Section 2.

2. Main results

Before showing our main results, we need recall the well-known Jensen’s inequality

Lemma 2.1 (see [3]). Let f be a convex function on an interval I and let w1, . . . , wn be nonnegative real numbers whose sum is1. Then for allx1, . . . , xn

∈I,

(5) w1f(x1) +· · ·+wnf(xn)≥f(w1x1+· · ·+wnxn).

Theorem 2.1. For any n and 1 k n 1, let f be a convex function and x1, . . . , xn lie in its domain and let {ci,j}1in,1jk+1 be nonnegative real numbers with Pk+1

j=1ci,j = 1 for all 1 i n. In addition, assume that xn+1 =x1, . . . , xn+k =xk, then we have

(6)

Xn

i=1

aif(xi)−f 1 n

Xn

i=1

aixi

!

n−1 n

Xn

i=1

f Xk+1

l=1

ci,lxi+l1

! ,

where

(7) ai :=

(Pi

l=1cl,i+Pk+1

l=i+1cnk+l1,kl+3, 1≤i≤k Pk+1

l=1 cil+1,l k+ 1 ≤i≤n.

Proof. For any 1 ≤i≤n and 1≤k ≤n−1, by the Jensen’s inequality (note ci,1+· · ·+ci,k+1 = 1), we have

f(ci,1xi+ci,2xi+1+· · ·+ci,k+1xi+k) Xk+1

l=1

ci,lf(xi+l1).

(3)

Thus, Xn

i=1

f Xk+1

l=1

ci,lxi+l1

!

Xn

i=1

Xk+1

l=1

ci,lf(xi+l1)

= Xk

i=1

Xi

l=1

cl,i+ Xk+1

l=i+1

cnk+l1,kl+3

!

f(xi) + Xn

i=k+1

Xk+1

l=1

cil+1,lf(xi) ,

Xn

i=1

aif(xi).

Furthermore, noting the fact Pn

i=1ai = n and using the Jensen’s inequality again,

Xn

i=1

aif(xi) = n n−1

" n X

i=1

aif(xi) 1 n

Xn

i=1

aif(xi)

#

n n−1

" n X

i=1

aif(xi)−f 1 n

Xn

i=1

aixi

!#

which implies our result.

Remark 2.1. If let k = 1, xn+1 = x1 and for any 1 i n, ci,1 =ci,2 = 1/2, then ai = 1 and from Theorem 2.1, we obtain

Xn

i=1

f(xi)−f 1 n

Xn

i=1

xi

!

n−1 n

Xn

i=1

f 1 2

X2

l=1

xi+l1

!

which is the inequality (3).

Theorem 2.2. For any n, let f be a convex function and x1, . . . , xn lie in its domain and let {ci}1in be nonnegative real numbers with Pn

i=1ci = 1.

In addition, assume that for any 1 k n−1, xn+1 = x1, . . . , xn+k = xk, cn+1 =c1, . . . , cn+k=ck, then we have

(8) Xn

i=1

aif(xi)−f 1 n

Xn

i=1

aixi

!

n−1 n

Xn

i=1

f(cixi+ci+1xi+1+· · ·+ (1−ci− · · · −ci+k1)xi+k), where

(9) ai :=

(

ici+ (k−i)cn+i+ 1Pk

l=1cn+il, 1≤i≤k kci+ 1Pk

l=1cil k+ 1 ≤i≤n.

(4)

Proof. As the similar proof as Theorem 2.1, for any 1 ≤i≤n, f(cixi+ci+1xi+1+· · ·+ (1−ci− · · · −ci+k1)xi+k)

Xk

l=1

ci+l1f(xi+l1) + (1−ci− · · · −ci+k1)f(xi+k).

Therefore, we have Xn

i=1

f(cixi+ci+1xi+1+· · ·+ (1−ci− · · · −ci+k−1)xi+k)

Xn

i=1

Xk

l=1

ci+l1f(xi+l1) + (1−ci− · · · −ci+k1)f(xi+k)

!

= Xk

i=1

ici+ (k−i)cn+i+ 1 Xk

l=1

cn+i−l

! f(xi)

+ Xn

i=k+1

kci+ 1 Xk

l=1

cil

!

f(xi), Xn

i=1

aif(xi).

Furthermore, noting the fact Pn

i=1ai =n and using the Jensen’s inequality, Xn

i=1

aif(xi) = n n−1

" n X

i=1

aif(xi) 1 n

Xn

i=1

aif(xi)

#

n n−1

" n X

i=1

aif(xi)−f 1 n

Xn

i=1

aixi

!#

which implies our result.

Remark 2.2. If let k = 1, xn+1 =x1 and Pn

i=1ci = 1, then a1 =c1+ (1−cn), ai =ci+ (1−ci1), 2 ≤i≤n and from Theorem 2.2, we obtain

(10) Xn

i=1

(ci+ (1−ci1))f(xi)−f 1 n

Xn

i=1

(ci+ (1−ci1))xi

!

n−1 n

Xn

i=1

f(cixi + (1−ci)xi+1), where c0 =cn.

The variant of the generalized Popovicui inequality is given in the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3. If f is a convex function and x1, x2. . . , xn lie in its domain and let {ci}1in be nonnegative real numbers with Pn

i=1ci = 1. In addition,

(5)

for any 1≤i≤n, let a=Pn

i=1ciai and bi = (a−ciai)/(1−ci), then (11) (n1)

Xn

i=1

f(bi)≤n

" n X

j=1

Kjcjf(aj)−f 1 n

Xn

j=1

Kjcjaj

!#

,

where for any 1≤j ≤n,

Kj = Xn

i=1,i6=j

Pn 1

j=1,j6=icj.

Proof. By using the Jensen’s inequality, for any 1 ≤i≤n, we have f(bi) =f

1

1−ci(a−ciai)

=f

Xn

j=1,j6=i

cj Pn

j=1,j6=icjaj

!

Xn

j=1,j6=i

cj Pn

j=1,j6=icj

f(aj). Thus by summing for i from 1 ton, we have

Xn

i=1

f(bi) Xn

i=1

Xn

j=1,j6=i

cj Pn

j=1,j6=icjf(aj)

= Xn

j=1

Xn

i=1,i6=j

Pn 1

j=1,j6=icj

!

cjf(aj) ,

Xn

j=1

Kjcjf(aj).

Furthermore, noting the fact thatPn

j=1Kjcj =nand using Jensen’s inequality, Xn

j=1

Kjcjf(aj) = n n−1

" n X

j=1

Kjcjf(aj) 1 n

Xn

j=1

Kjcjf(aj)

#

n n−1

" n X

j=1

Kjcjf(aj)−f 1 n

Xn

j=1

Kjcjaj

!#

.

which means our result.

Remark 2.3. For all 1 i n, let ci = 1/n, then a = (a1 +· · · +an)/n, bi = (na−ai)/(n1) andKici = 1, therefore we get

(n1) Xn

i=1

f(bi)≤n

" n X

j=1

f(aj)−f 1 n

Xn

j=1

aj

!#

, which is the inequality (4).

(6)

References

[1] L. Bougoffa. New inequalities about convex functions. JIPAM. J. Inequal. Pure Appl.

Math., 7(4):Article 148, 3 pp. (electronic), 2006.

[2] K. Kedlaya.A < B (Ais less than B). based on notes for the Math Olympiad Program (MOP) Version 1.0, last revised August 2, 1999.

[3] D. S. Mitrinovi´c, J. E. Peˇcari´c, and A. M. Fink.Classical and new inequalities in analysis, volume 61 ofMathematics and its Applications (East European Series). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1993.

[4] T. Popoviciu. Sur certaines in´egalit´es qui caract´erisent les fonctions convexes. An. S¸ti.

Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Ia¸si Sect¸. I a Mat. (N.S.), 11B:155–164, 1965.

Received March 17, 2010.

X. K. Chai,

College of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan Normal University,

Henan Province, 453007, China

Y. Miao,

College of Mathematics and Information Science, Henan Normal University,

Henan Province, 453007, China

E-mail address: [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Using the generalized sine law for simplices and a known inequality in [2], we get some inequalities for the sines of k-dimensional vertex angles of an n-simplex.. Recently, Yang Lu

Costovici, Some inequalities of Mathieu type, Symposium septi- mum tirapolensegeneralis topologiae et suae applicationum, Chi¸sin˘ au, MCMXCVI (1996), 82-84..

Inequality, multidimensional Hardy-type inequalities, multidimen- sional P´ olya–Knopp type inequalities, best constant, power weights,

VUKVI ´ C, Hilbert-Pachpatte type inequalities from Bonsall’s form of Hilbert’s inequality, J.. Pure

Markett, “Cohen type inequalities for Jacobi, Laguerre and Hermite expansions,” SIAM Jour- nal on Mathematical Analysis, vol.. Fejzullahu, “Divergent Ces`aro means of

In this paper, we define a symmetric function, show its properties, and establish several analytic inequalities, some of which are &#34;Ky Fan&#34; type inequalities.. The

Hanner-type inequality and optimal 2-unif0rm convexity and smoothness inequalities.. 北九州高専

In 1976 Jprgensen obtained the following important theorem, which gives anec- essary condition for anon-elementary M\&#34;obius transformation group $G=\langle A, B\rangle$