Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Y. Hatsugai
Department of Physics, Univ. Tsukuba
Topological Order parameters
Characterization of Topological Phases
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Y. Hatsugai
Department of Physics, Univ. Tsukuba
Topological Order parameters
Characterization of Topological Phases
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Plan
Gap nodes
Dimension & co-dimension
Anisotropic superconductivity/fluidity Graphene & Chiral symmetry
Adiabatic invariants
Gapped Gapless
Gapped Bulk-edge correspondence
Gapped Entanglement entropy
Gapless
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Gapless Topological !
Nodes structures
protected by symmetry
point nodes, line nodes,...
gapless : generic 2 levels near the gap
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
(Rx, Ry, Rz)
3 parameters
expanded by Pauli matrices von Neumann-Wigner ’29
Berry ’84
To be gapless: 3 parameters to be tuned
co-dimension=3 (3 conditions)
2 1
2-D closed surface in 3D
T 2 R(T 2)
2D Brillouin zone :periodic in kx & ky
2D Torus
map ex.
R = 0
gapless point
Single particle problem (mean field)
E = ±|R(k)|
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
2D examples
2 1
2D Brillouin zone d-wave superconductivity
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
YH-Ryu, ’02
p-wave superconductivity
Chern #=+2/ -2
Chern #=+1/ -1
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
ABM states & Dirac mono pole
2 1
2D Brillouin zone
3rd momentum: time line
co-dimension 3
In 3D, 3--3=0 : point nodes topological stability
Anderson-Brinkman-Morel (ABM) phase of He
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
YH-Ryu-Kohmoto, ’04
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
ABM states & Dirac mono pole
2 1
2D Brillouin zone
3rd momentum: time line
co-dimension 3
In 3D, 3--3=0 : point nodes topological stability
Anderson-Brinkman-Morel (ABM) phase of He
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
YH-Ryu-Kohmoto, ’04
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Chiral symmetry ?
Wallace ’47 Semenoff ’85
Haldane ’88 Nielsen-Ninomiya ‘81
chiral symmetric
{H, } = 0, doubling2 = 1
Hopping between
Chiral Symmetry
honeycomb lattice: Bipartite
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Chiral symmetry ?
Wallace ’47 Semenoff ’85
Haldane ’88 Nielsen-Ninomiya ‘81
chiral symmetric
{H, } = 0, doubling2 = 1
Fermion doubling
K K’
2D analogue of
Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem in 4D lattice Gauge theory
Topological ! Hopping between
Chiral Symmetry
honeycomb lattice: Bipartite
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Dirac Cones are Stable!
Doubled Dirac Cones
Dirac Cones are stable for
small but finite perturbation It can be gapped, if it’s large.
The Dirac Cornes are not accidental
It has topological stability Hatsugai, Fukui, Aoki, ‘06
extended BZ
chiral symmetric perturbation t’
t’
t’
t t
t
Chiral Symmetry
{H, } = 0, 2 = 1
respect chiral symmetry
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Dirac Cones are Stable!
Doubled Dirac Cones
Dirac Cones are stable for
small but finite perturbation It can be gapped, if it’s large.
The Dirac Cornes are not accidental
It has topological stability Hatsugai, Fukui, Aoki, ‘06
extended BZ
chiral symmetric perturbation t’
t’
t’
t t
t
Chiral Symmetry
{H, } = 0, 2 = 1
respect chiral symmetry
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2
The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones
Gapless
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2
Topological Stability of
the doubled Dirac Cones
The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones
Gapless
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2
Topological Stability of
the doubled Dirac Cones
The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones
Gapped if the perturbation is too large
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2
Topological Stability of
the doubled Dirac Cones
The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones
Gapless
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes
General zeros of Dirac Cones
(k
x, k
y)
(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2
Topological Stability of
the doubled Dirac Cones
The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones
Gapless
chiral symmetric
H(k1, k2) =
✓ 0
0
◆
E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =
✓ 1 0 0 1
◆
= 3
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry
{ H
e↵,
9} = H
e↵+ H
e↵= 0
: real : Time reversal & Inversion
=
⇢
z y
: bipartite lattice & hopping between them
He↵
Rz = 0 Ry = 0
= n · { H
e↵, } = 0 n ? R
R(k)
n
(X, Y , n ) =
⇢ right handed = +1 left handed = 1 chirality
X, Y m⇤
X = @k1R, Y = @k2R
X Y
He↵ ! 0, k ! k0
Zero gap condition expand by k = k k0
He↵ = R(k) · ⇡ (X · ) kx + (Y · ) ky
2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|
Generically
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
(Rx, Ry, Rz)
3D
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry
{ H
e↵,
9} = H
e↵+ H
e↵= 0
: real : Time reversal & Inversion
=
⇢
z y
: bipartite lattice & hopping between them
He↵
Rz = 0 Ry = 0
= n · { H
e↵, } = 0 n ? R
R(k)
n
(X, Y , n ) =
⇢ right handed = +1 left handed = 1 chirality
X, Y m⇤
X = @k1R, Y = @k2R
X Y
He↵ ! 0, k ! k0
Zero gap condition expand by k = k k0
He↵ = R(k) · ⇡ (X · ) kx + (Y · ) ky
2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|
Generically
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
(Rx, Ry, Rz) (n · )(R · ) = n · R + i(n ⇥ R) ·3D
(R · )(n · ) = n · R i(n ⇥ R) · {R · , n · } = 2n · R
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry
{ H
e↵,
9} = H
e↵+ H
e↵= 0
: real : Time reversal & Inversion
=
⇢
z y
: bipartite lattice & hopping between them
He↵
Rz = 0 Ry = 0
= n · { H
e↵, } = 0 n ? R
R(k)
n
(X, Y , n ) =
⇢ right handed = +1 left handed = 1 chirality
X, Y m⇤
X = @k1R, Y = @k2R
X Y
He↵ ! 0, k ! k0
Zero gap condition expand by k = k k0
He↵ = R(k) · ⇡ (X · ) kx + (Y · ) ky
2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|
Generically
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
(Rx, Ry, Rz)
3D
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry
{ H
e↵,
9} = H
e↵+ H
e↵= 0
: real : Time reversal & Inversion
=
⇢
z y
: bipartite lattice & hopping between them
He↵
Rz = 0 Ry = 0
= n · { H
e↵, } = 0 n ? R
R(k)
n X
Y
He↵ ! 0, k ! k0
Zero gap condition: Dirac dispersion
2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|
Generically
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
(Rx, Ry, Rz)
3D
Chiral Symmetry
{H, } = 0, 2 = 1
co-dimension of Dirac cones=2
graphene, d-wave superconductor in 2D
Chiral symmetry
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Topological stability of the Doubled Dirac cones
nγ nγ
R R
2 1
2-D closed surface in 3D
T 2
Generically
R(T 2) {H, } = 0
c.f. 4D graphene & chiral symmetry, M. Creutz ’08
H(k) = R(k) · =
✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz
◆
2D Brillouin zone :periodic in kx & ky
2D Torus map
(Rx, Ry, Rz)
3D
Chiral symmetry n ? R
= n · R(k) is on a plane normal to n
R(T2) is collapsed on the plane
Topologically stable
Gepped :
perturbation is too large
=(0,0,0)
doubled Dirac cones
also with TR inv. 5D YH, ’10
“balloon”
“collapsed balloon” “collapsed balloon”
2D Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem
YH-Fukui-Aoki, ’06
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Graphene with deformation
2 1
2D Brillouin zone
deformation of the system: time line
d-wave superconductor In 2D with chiral symmetry, 2--2=0
co-dimension 2
Dirac cones of graphene topological stability in 2D
YH-Fukui-Aoki, ’06
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Graphene with deformation
2 1
2D Brillouin zone
deformation of the system: time line
d-wave superconductor In 2D with chiral symmetry, 2--2=0
co-dimension 2
Dirac cones of graphene topological stability in 2D
YH-Fukui-Aoki, ’06
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
c.f. Blount’85
YH-Ryu-Kohmoto, ’04
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Gapless Topological !
Nodes characterize the phase topologically
co-dimension 3
d-wave superconductor In 3D, 3--3=0 : point nodes :ABM state of He
Weyl semi-metal
In 3D with TR invariance, 3--2=1 : line nodes superBlount’85 In 2D with chiral symmety
with TR invariance
with TR invariance/chiral symmetry co-dimension 2
: Dirac cones of graphene Generic
Volovik ’97
YH-Ryu-Kohmoto ’04 YH-Ryu’02
YH-Ryu & Ryu-YH ’02
topological stabile Dirac point Burkov-Balents ’11
2--2=0
Wallace’47
Hall Conductance has double Topological meanings
Thouless-Kohmoto-Nightingale-den Nijs ‘82 Sum of the First Chern numbers below EF
xybulk = e2
h ⌅: ⇥(k)<EF
C⌅
⇥xyedge = e2
h I( j, Cj)
When EF is in the j-th gap
Winding number of the edge state
on the complex energy surface YH ‘93a YH ‘93b
Two topological quantities
Bulk ---- Edge Correspondence
xy bulk = xy edge
Physically
Bulk C
j= I
jI
j 1Edge
YH, PRL 71, 3697 (1993)
Another type of Edge states in Graphene
Quantum Hall edge states
Topologically protected edge states
Symmetry protected edge states
( with topological origin & stability )
S. Ryu (now KITP) & YH
Dirac Dispersion : Chiral Symmetry!
without magnetic field
with magnetic field
M. Arikawa, H. Aoki & YH arXiv:0805.3240 & 0806.2429
New feature : topological compensation can be observed by STM experiments
Graphene on a Cylinder
now called as Graphene
d-wave superconductivity
These 2 systems are
topologically equivalent with each other
Localized zero modes of topological ordered states
cf. Witten’s SUSY QM
1D systems with parameter ky : momentum along the ribbon
Zigzag
Bearded
Armchair
As for a1D system parametrized by ky
S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002)
S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002)
Zero energy localized states EXIST
S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002)
Zero energy localized states EXIST
Kuge, Maruyama, YH, arXiv:0802.2425
Topological Aspects of Surface States in Semiconductors
= ⇥
A = ⇥
d⌃k · A⌃ = ⇥
0 quantized
due to chiral symmetry
A⇤ =⇥ (k)|⇧⇤ k (k)⇤
= ⇥ : There exists odd number of zero modes
{ , H} = H + H =0
Berry phase
When the zero modes exist?
A⇤ =⇥ (k)|⇧⇤ k (k)⇤
Consider Berry phase of the bulk (without boundaries)
S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002) Y.Hatsugai., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75 123601 (2006)
Kuge, Maruyama, Y. Hatsugai, arXiv:0802.2425
1D two site problem with boundaries
= A = d⇧k · A⇧
Zak
{ , H} = H + H =0
Require Local Chiral Symmetry (ex. bipartite )
Quantized
= ⇥
A = ⇥ 0
: There exists odd number of zero modes
Zero energy localized states EXIST
= ⇥
Symmetry protected zero modes: bulk-edge correspondence
1D systems with parameter ky : momentum along the ribbon
Zigzag
Bearded
Armchair
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Symmetry protected
Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry
(A-B sublattice symmetry)
:Bipartite
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Symmetry protected
Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
1.Zero energy edge states of graphene
Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene
2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry
(A-B sublattice symmetry)
:Bipartite
(Real
Order parameter)
:Time Reversal
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Symmetry protected
Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry
(A-B sublattice symmetry)
:Bipartite
(Real
Order parameter)
:Time Reversal
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
Spontaneous breaking of these chiral symmetries
: Peierls instabilities of Flat (edge) bands
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Symmetry protected
Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry
(A-B sublattice symmetry)
:Bipartite
(Real
Order parameter)
:Time Reversal
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
Spontaneous breaking of these chiral symmetries
: Peierls instabilities of Flat (edge) bands
Boundary magnetic
moments
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Symmetry protected
Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states
Universality of Zero Energy Edge States
These 2 systems are topologically equivalent
{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry
(A-B sublattice symmetry)
:Bipartite
(Real
Order parameter)
:Time Reversal
d-wave superconductor
4 Dirac cones
graphene
2 Dirac cones
Spontaneous breaking of these chiral symmetries
: Peierls instabilities of Flat (edge) bands
Boundary magnetic
moments
Spontaneous local flux generation
near defects
‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH
Symmetry protected
Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018
Hubbard model Mean-field
U>UC
U<UC
Chiral symmetry breaking (graphene)
Chiral symmetry is broken only in the boundaries
Chiral symmetry is broken
both in the bulk and boundaries
DFT, Okada-Oshiyama, ’01
flatband: unstable for infinitesimal U (Stoner)
Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018