• 検索結果がありません。

Characterization of Topological Phases

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Characterization of Topological Phases"

Copied!
63
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Y. Hatsugai

Department of Physics, Univ. Tsukuba

Topological Order parameters

Characterization of Topological Phases

(2)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Y. Hatsugai

Department of Physics, Univ. Tsukuba

Topological Order parameters

Characterization of Topological Phases

(3)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Plan

Gap nodes

Dimension & co-dimension

Anisotropic superconductivity/fluidity Graphene & Chiral symmetry

Adiabatic invariants

Gapped Gapless

Gapped Bulk-edge correspondence

Gapped Entanglement entropy

Gapless

(4)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Gapless Topological !

Nodes structures

protected by symmetry

point nodes, line nodes,...

gapless : generic 2 levels near the gap

H(k) = R(k) · =

Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

(Rx, Ry, Rz)

3 parameters

expanded by Pauli matrices von Neumann-Wigner ’29

Berry ’84

To be gapless: 3 parameters to be tuned

co-dimension=3 (3 conditions)

2 1

2-D closed surface in 3D

T 2 R(T 2)

2D Brillouin zone :periodic in kx & ky

2D Torus

map ex.

R = 0

gapless point

Single particle problem (mean field)

E = ±|R(k)|

(5)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

2D examples

2 1

2D Brillouin zone d-wave superconductivity

H(k) = R(k) · =

Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

YH-Ryu, ’02

p-wave superconductivity

Chern #=+2/ -2

Chern #=+1/ -1

(6)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

ABM states & Dirac mono pole

2 1

2D Brillouin zone

3rd momentum: time line

co-dimension 3

In 3D, 3--3=0 : point nodes topological stability

Anderson-Brinkman-Morel (ABM) phase of He

H(k) = R(k) · =

Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

YH-Ryu-Kohmoto, ’04

(7)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

ABM states & Dirac mono pole

2 1

2D Brillouin zone

3rd momentum: time line

co-dimension 3

In 3D, 3--3=0 : point nodes topological stability

Anderson-Brinkman-Morel (ABM) phase of He

H(k) = R(k) · =

Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

YH-Ryu-Kohmoto, ’04

(8)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Chiral symmetry ?

Wallace ’47 Semenoff ’85

Haldane ’88 Nielsen-Ninomiya ‘81

chiral symmetric

{H, } = 0, doubling2 = 1

Hopping between

Chiral Symmetry

honeycomb lattice: Bipartite

(9)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Chiral symmetry ?

Wallace ’47 Semenoff ’85

Haldane ’88 Nielsen-Ninomiya ‘81

chiral symmetric

{H, } = 0, doubling2 = 1

Fermion doubling

K K’

2D analogue of

Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem in 4D lattice Gauge theory

Topological ! Hopping between

Chiral Symmetry

honeycomb lattice: Bipartite

(10)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Dirac Cones are Stable!

Doubled Dirac Cones

Dirac Cones are stable for

small but finite perturbation It can be gapped, if it’s large.

The Dirac Cornes are not accidental

It has topological stability Hatsugai, Fukui, Aoki, ‘06

extended BZ

chiral symmetric perturbation t’

t’

t’

t t

t

Chiral Symmetry

{H, } = 0, 2 = 1

respect chiral symmetry

(11)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Dirac Cones are Stable!

Doubled Dirac Cones

Dirac Cones are stable for

small but finite perturbation It can be gapped, if it’s large.

The Dirac Cornes are not accidental

It has topological stability Hatsugai, Fukui, Aoki, ‘06

extended BZ

chiral symmetric perturbation t’

t’

t’

t t

t

Chiral Symmetry

{H, } = 0, 2 = 1

respect chiral symmetry

(12)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(13)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(14)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(15)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(16)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2

The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones

Gapless

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(17)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2

Topological Stability of

the doubled Dirac Cones

The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones

Gapless

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(18)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2

Topological Stability of

the doubled Dirac Cones

The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones

Gapped if the perturbation is too large

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(19)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2

Topological Stability of

the doubled Dirac Cones

The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones

Gapless

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(20)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological Stability of the Dirac Cornes

General zeros of Dirac Cones

(k

x

, k

y

)

(kx, ky), kx : 0 2 : loop C(ky) in C loop C(ky) moves : ky : 0 2

Topological Stability of

the doubled Dirac Cones

The loop cut the origin Dirac Cones

Gapless

chiral symmetric

H(k1, k2) =

✓ 0

0

E(k1, k2) = ±| | {H, } = 0 =

✓ 1 0 0 1

= 3

(21)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry

{ H

e↵

,

9

} = H

e↵

+ H

e↵

= 0

: real : Time reversal & Inversion

=

z y

: bipartite lattice & hopping between them

He↵

Rz = 0 Ry = 0

= n · { H

e↵

, } = 0 n ? R

R(k)

n

(X, Y , n ) =

right handed = +1 left handed = 1 chirality

X, Y m

X = @k1R, Y = @k2R

X Y

He↵ ! 0, k ! k0

Zero gap condition expand by k = k k0

He↵ = R(k) · ⇡ (X · ) kx + (Y · ) ky

2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|

Generically

H(k) = R(k) · =

✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

(Rx, Ry, Rz)

3D

(22)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry

{ H

e↵

,

9

} = H

e↵

+ H

e↵

= 0

: real : Time reversal & Inversion

=

z y

: bipartite lattice & hopping between them

He↵

Rz = 0 Ry = 0

= n · { H

e↵

, } = 0 n ? R

R(k)

n

(X, Y , n ) =

right handed = +1 left handed = 1 chirality

X, Y m

X = @k1R, Y = @k2R

X Y

He↵ ! 0, k ! k0

Zero gap condition expand by k = k k0

He↵ = R(k) · ⇡ (X · ) kx + (Y · ) ky

2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|

Generically

H(k) = R(k) · =

✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

(Rx, Ry, Rz) (n · )(R · ) = n · R + i(n ⇥ R) ·3D

(R · )(n · ) = n · R i(n ⇥ R) · {R · , n · } = 2n · R

(23)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry

{ H

e↵

,

9

} = H

e↵

+ H

e↵

= 0

: real : Time reversal & Inversion

=

z y

: bipartite lattice & hopping between them

He↵

Rz = 0 Ry = 0

= n · { H

e↵

, } = 0 n ? R

R(k)

n

(X, Y , n ) =

right handed = +1 left handed = 1 chirality

X, Y m

X = @k1R, Y = @k2R

X Y

He↵ ! 0, k ! k0

Zero gap condition expand by k = k k0

He↵ = R(k) · ⇡ (X · ) kx + (Y · ) ky

2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|

Generically

H(k) = R(k) · =

✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

(Rx, Ry, Rz)

3D

(24)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Geometrical meaning of Chiral symmetry

{ H

e↵

,

9

} = H

e↵

+ H

e↵

= 0

: real : Time reversal & Inversion

=

z y

: bipartite lattice & hopping between them

He↵

Rz = 0 Ry = 0

= n · { H

e↵

, } = 0 n ? R

R(k)

n X

Y

He↵ ! 0, k ! k0

Zero gap condition: Dirac dispersion

2 = 1 E = ±|R(k)|

Generically

H(k) = R(k) · =

✓ Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

(Rx, Ry, Rz)

3D

Chiral Symmetry

{H, } = 0, 2 = 1

co-dimension of Dirac cones=2

graphene, d-wave superconductor in 2D

Chiral symmetry

(25)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Topological stability of the Doubled Dirac cones

nγ nγ

R R

2 1

2-D closed surface in 3D

T 2

Generically

R(T 2) {H, } = 0

c.f. 4D graphene & chiral symmetry, M. Creutz ’08

H(k) = R(k) · =

Rz Rx iRy Ry + iRy Rz

2D Brillouin zone :periodic in kx & ky

2D Torus map

(Rx, Ry, Rz)

3D

Chiral symmetry n ? R

= n · R(k) is on a plane normal to n

R(T2) is collapsed on the plane

Topologically stable

Gepped :

perturbation is too large

=(0,0,0)

doubled Dirac cones

also with TR inv. 5D YH, ’10

“balloon”

“collapsed balloon” “collapsed balloon”

2D Nielsen-Ninomiya theorem

YH-Fukui-Aoki, ’06

(26)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Graphene with deformation

2 1

2D Brillouin zone

deformation of the system: time line

d-wave superconductor In 2D with chiral symmetry, 2--2=0

co-dimension 2

Dirac cones of graphene topological stability in 2D

YH-Fukui-Aoki, ’06

(27)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Graphene with deformation

2 1

2D Brillouin zone

deformation of the system: time line

d-wave superconductor In 2D with chiral symmetry, 2--2=0

co-dimension 2

Dirac cones of graphene topological stability in 2D

YH-Fukui-Aoki, ’06

(28)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

c.f. Blount’85

YH-Ryu-Kohmoto, ’04

(29)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Gapless Topological !

Nodes characterize the phase topologically

co-dimension 3

d-wave superconductor In 3D, 3--3=0 : point nodes :ABM state of He

Weyl semi-metal

In 3D with TR invariance, 3--2=1 : line nodes superBlount’85 In 2D with chiral symmety

with TR invariance

with TR invariance/chiral symmetry co-dimension 2

: Dirac cones of graphene Generic

Volovik ’97

YH-Ryu-Kohmoto ’04 YH-Ryu’02

YH-Ryu & Ryu-YH ’02

topological stabile Dirac point Burkov-Balents ’11

2--2=0

Wallace’47

(30)

Hall Conductance has double Topological meanings

Thouless-Kohmoto-Nightingale-den Nijs ‘82 Sum of the First Chern numbers below EF

xybulk = e2

h ⌅: (k)<EF

C

xyedge = e2

h I( j, Cj)

When EF is in the j-th gap

Winding number of the edge state

on the complex energy surface YH ‘93a YH ‘93b

Two topological quantities

Bulk ---- Edge Correspondence

xy bulk = xy edge

Physically

Bulk C

j

= I

j

I

j 1

Edge

YH, PRL 71, 3697 (1993)

(31)

Another type of Edge states in Graphene

Quantum Hall edge states

Topologically protected edge states

Symmetry protected edge states

( with topological origin & stability )

S. Ryu (now KITP) & YH

Dirac Dispersion : Chiral Symmetry!

without magnetic field

with magnetic field

M. Arikawa, H. Aoki & YH arXiv:0805.3240 & 0806.2429

New feature : topological compensation can be observed by STM experiments

(32)

Graphene on a Cylinder

now called as Graphene

(33)
(34)

d-wave superconductivity

(35)

These 2 systems are

topologically equivalent with each other

Localized zero modes of topological ordered states

cf. Witten’s SUSY QM

(36)

1D systems with parameter ky : momentum along the ribbon

(37)

Zigzag

Bearded

Armchair

(38)
(39)

As for a1D system parametrized by ky

(40)

S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002)

(41)

S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002)

Zero energy localized states EXIST

(42)

S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002)

Zero energy localized states EXIST

Kuge, Maruyama, YH, arXiv:0802.2425

Topological Aspects of Surface States in Semiconductors

= ⇥

A = ⇥

d⌃k · A⌃ = ⇥

0 quantized

due to chiral symmetry

A⇤ =⇥ (k)|⇧⇤ k (k)⇤

= ⇥ : There exists odd number of zero modes

{ , H} = H + H =0

Berry phase

(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)

When the zero modes exist?

A⇤ =⇥ (k)|⇧⇤ k (k)⇤

Consider Berry phase of the bulk (without boundaries)

S.Ryu & Y.Hatsugai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 077002 (2002) Y.Hatsugai., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75 123601 (2006)

Kuge, Maruyama, Y. Hatsugai, arXiv:0802.2425

1D two site problem with boundaries

= A = d⇧k · A⇧

Zak

{ , H} = H + H =0

Require Local Chiral Symmetry (ex. bipartite )

Quantized

= ⇥

A = ⇥ 0

: There exists odd number of zero modes

Zero energy localized states EXIST

= ⇥

Symmetry protected zero modes: bulk-edge correspondence

(49)

1D systems with parameter ky : momentum along the ribbon

(50)

Zigzag

Bearded

Armchair

(51)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

(52)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

(53)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

(54)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

(55)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

(56)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

Symmetry protected

Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states

(57)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry

(A-B sublattice symmetry)

:Bipartite

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

Symmetry protected

Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states

(58)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

1.Zero energy edge states of graphene

Boundary Magnetic moments of graphene

2.Andreev bound states of d-wave superconductors Zero bias conductance peak

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry

(A-B sublattice symmetry)

:Bipartite

(Real

Order parameter)

:Time Reversal

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

Symmetry protected

Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states

(59)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry

(A-B sublattice symmetry)

:Bipartite

(Real

Order parameter)

:Time Reversal

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

Spontaneous breaking of these chiral symmetries

: Peierls instabilities of Flat (edge) bands

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

Symmetry protected

Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states

(60)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry

(A-B sublattice symmetry)

:Bipartite

(Real

Order parameter)

:Time Reversal

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

Spontaneous breaking of these chiral symmetries

: Peierls instabilities of Flat (edge) bands

Boundary magnetic

moments

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

Symmetry protected

Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states

(61)

Universality of Zero Energy Edge States

These 2 systems are topologically equivalent

{ , H} = H + H =0 , 2 = 1 chiral symmetry

(A-B sublattice symmetry)

:Bipartite

(Real

Order parameter)

:Time Reversal

d-wave superconductor

4 Dirac cones

graphene

2 Dirac cones

Spontaneous breaking of these chiral symmetries

: Peierls instabilities of Flat (edge) bands

Boundary magnetic

moments

Spontaneous local flux generation

near defects

‘02---’04 S. Ryu & YH

Symmetry protected

Zero modes of Dirac fermions :1D Flat Band of edge states

(62)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Hubbard model Mean-field

U>UC

U<UC

Chiral symmetry breaking (graphene)

Chiral symmetry is broken only in the boundaries

Chiral symmetry is broken

both in the bulk and boundaries

DFT, Okada-Oshiyama, ’01

flatband: unstable for infinitesimal U (Stoner)

(63)

Focus lecture: Kyushu Univ., July17-19, 2018

Thank you

参照

関連したドキュメント

Graev obtained in that paper (Theorem 9 of § 11) a complete isomorphical classification of free topological groups of countable compact spaces (of course two topological groups are

Given a compact Hausdorff topological group G, we denote by O(G) the dense Hopf ∗-subalgebra of the commutative C ∗ -algebra C(G) spanned by the matrix coefficients of

In [12], as a generalization of highest weight vectors, the notion of extremal weight vectors is introduced, and it is shown that the uni- versal module generated by an extremal

These manifolds have strictly negative scalar curvature and the under- lying topological 4-manifolds do not admit any Einstein metrics1. Such 4-manifolds are of particular interest

This applies to the case where the induced action 1 ϕ acts transitively on the base manifold and states that each point in the bundle gives rise to a bijection between the set

Given a principal fibre bundle with structure group S, and a fibre transitive Lie group G of automorphisms thereon, Wang’s theorem identifies the invariant connections with

Con- sequently, they defined basic notions of soft topological spaces such as open soft and closed soft sets, soft subspace, soft closure, soft nbd of a point, soft separation

In this way we provide new short proofs of some theorems from the literature regarding linearity, Betti numbers, and (sequentially) Cohen-Macaulay properties of edge ideals