John Calvin’s Understanding of
Baptism, and the Relation Between the
Sacraments and Christian Ethics
IsaoMATSUDAIRA
Ⅰ. Calvin’s Understanding of Baptism.
JohnCalvindefinesbaptismas“thesignoftheinitiationbywhichweare receivedintothesocietyoftheChurch,inorderthat,engraftedtoChrist, wemaybereckonedamongGod’schildren”.1)Hementionsthreetokens whichareimpartedtotheChristianinbaptism;forgivenessofhumansins, thebeliever’smortificationandrenewalinChrist,andtheunionbetween ChristandHisbelievers.2)Thefirsttwoofthesetokensdependwhollyupon thethird,sinceCalvin’steachingconcerningbaptismalwaysreturnstothat figurativeunion. WhileCalvinaffirmsthatbaptismis“asignofforgiveness,”whichdoes notsignifythepowerofpurificationinwater,itisGod’sdeclarationthat believersareincorporatedintothebodyofChrist.ThusCalvinnotesthat “weputonChristinbaptism”.3)AtheologianDanielMigliore,likewise, キーワード:ジョン・カルビン,洗礼,サクラメント,キリスト教倫理
1 )JohnCalvin,Institutes of the Christian Religion,ed.JohnT.McNeill,trans. FordLewisBattles(Philadelphia:WestminsterPress,n.d.),Vol.2,p.1303. 2 )Ibid.,pp.1304-1308.
writesthat“theeventofbaptismthusmarksthebeginningoftheChristian’s participation in the life, death, and resurrection of Christ.”4) Therefore,
CalvinobservesthatChrististherealobjectofbaptism. AccordingtoCalvin,baptism’sunionwithChristrepresentsnotonlyHis deathandresurrection,butalsoHisblessing.5)Thismysticalunionoccurs bytheworkoftheHolySpirit,bywhosegracebelieversaretransformed tothenewnessoflifeandbroughtintothefellowshipofChrist.6)Ronald WallaceexplainsCalvin’sviewthat“thisnewlifeisthelifeofsonshipof theFatherinunionwithChrist,whowasdeclaredthesonofGodbythe resurrectionfromthedead.Baptismisthusasignofadoptionintothe familyofGod.”7) AlthoughIagreewithallofCalvin’saforementionedviewsonbaptism, I am more hesitant concerning his theory of infant baptism. Calvin asserts that infant baptism corresponds to Jewish circumcision, since baptism occupies the place of circumcision to fulfill the same office amongChristians.8)Heseesbothbaptismandcircumcisionasthesame confirmationofGod’scovenant,whichcontinuesfromtheOldTestament totheNewTestament.9)BecauseScripturestatesthatChristinvitedand blessedlittlechildrenaspartakersoftheKingdomofHeaven(inMatthew 19:13-15),CalvinarguesthatChristiansshouldnotexcludethemfromthe 4 )DanielL.Migliore,FaithSeeingUnderstanding:AnIntroductiontoChristian Theology(GrandRapids:EerdmansPublishingCo.,1991),p.215. 5 )Calvin,p.1307. 6 )Ibid.,p.1325. 7 )RonaldS.Wallace,Calvin’sDoctrineoftheWordandSacrament(Grand Rapids:EerdmansPublishingC.,1957),p.180. 8 )Calvin,p.1327. 9 )Ibid.,p.1329.
signandthebenefitofbaptism.10)
I agree with Calvin’s view that the covenant in operation in the Old TestamentisessentiallythesameasthecovenantintheNewTestament. Bothbaptismandcircumcisionsymbolizesalvationtoitsdeepestandfullest extent.Thereisonlyonebasicunderlyingcovenantforallages. JesuscommandsHisapostlestogointothewholeworldtopreachthe gospel,andHesaysthat“Hewhohasbelievedandhasbeenbaptizedshall besaved;buthewhohasdisbelievedshallbecondemned”(inMark16: 16).However,inotherword,Jesussaysthatapersonshallnotbesaved, eventhoughhehasbeenbaptized,ifhedoesnotbelieve.Thus,without faithbaptismwouldbeinvain.InboththeOldTestamentandtheNew Testament, the covenant gave only one Mediator, namely Jesus Christ; thereisonlyoneconditionforsalvation,namelyfaith.Christiansmustnot ignorethatfact. MigliorenotesKarlBarth’sopinionthat“inbaptismthereisfirstan actionofGod(baptismwiththeSpirit)andthenacorrespondinghuman action(baptismwithwater):thereisadivinegiftandahumanresponse.”11) Inasense,BarthdividesbaptismintothebaptismoftheSpiritandthat ofwater.Thefirstreferstocovenantlove,andthelastreferstohuman faith.IagreewiththisviewsinceIbelievethat“baptismandfaithare inseparablyrelated.”12)Ifthisviewiscorrect,infantbaptismfailstoexplain howinfantseitherreceivebaptisminfaith,orwitnesstoitsfaithbeforethe congregation. Calvindeclaresthatrejectionofinfantbaptismstandsfortherefection 10)Ibid.,p.1332. 11)Migliore,p.216. 12)Ibid.,p.218.
of infants as heirs of the Kingdom of Heaven.13) Nevertheless, I must
doubtwhetherthepracticeofinfantbaptismtrulyreflectsthemeaningof welcomingthemintotheChurchcommunity.Therefore,whenChristians identifybaptismwithwaterasadeclarationoftheirfaith,itisdefficultto regardinfantbaptismasthetruebaptism.
Ⅱ. The Relation Between the Sacraments and Christian Ethics.
Thedoctrineofthesacramentsprimarilybringsanunderstandingthat thepromisesgivenintheWordarethatofaChristian’smysticalunionwith thebodyofChrist.AsIstatedpreviously,forCalvin,thisunionwithChrist isoneofthemostimportantdoctrinesforunderstandingthemeaningofthe sacraments.CalvinspeaksofbothsacramentsasbeingsignsofChristians’ incorporationintothebodyofChrist. Therefore,thepurposeofthesacramentsistoshowthesolidarityof allChristiansasmembersofChrist’sbody.Especiallyinthepracticeof baptism,thisunionisobvious.ChristiansarejoinedtoChrist’sdeathand resurrection,thatsecretunionbywhichtheygrowintoonewithChrist.14) Christiansmustrealizethattheunionsignifiesnotonlytheunionbetween ChristandHisbelievers,butalsotheunionamongallofChrist’sbelievers. There is no difference in each individual, for all believers are equally engraftedintoChrist.Migliorenotesthat“baptismcreatesasolidaritythat defiesandshattersthedivisionsandbarriersthatsinfulhumanbeingshave created.”15)Besides,Calvinsuggeststhatthereisnobenefitinbaptism 13)Calvin,p.1330. 14)Ibid.,p.1385. 15)Migliore,p.224.
withouttheunity.16)Accordingly,torefusethegracioussolidarityinChrist istorefusetocometotheonesuresourceofthegraceofChrist.“Racism, sexism,andotherideologiesofseparation”17)mustbeeliminatedfromthe Church,sincetheyonlycauseadenialofsolidaritywithintheChristian community. Miglioreexplainsthatbaptismsignifiesmultidenominationalsolidarity, andtheLord’sSuppersignifiesmultidenominationalsharing.18)Christians
should comprehend that both sacraments are mutually related. To this end, Enrique Dussel notes that for Christianity to be a religion that emphasizesthespiritualunionbetweenbelieversinChrist,theChristian lifeshouldestablishtheessentialimportanceofsensitivityfortheneedsof itsmembers.19)ThisisindeedtrueforChristianlife.Miglioreaddressesthe Lord’sSupperas“thesacramentofhumanparticipationinthedivinelifeby sharinglifewitheachother.”20)Sharinglifewithothers,becauseoftheunity inChrist,isthemostimportantissueconcerningtherelationbetweenthe sacramentsandChristianethics.TherearemillionsofhungryChristians intheworld,withwhomChristiansshouldsharetheirbreadandwine,if theyaretrulyunitedinChrist.Inthissense,theLord’sSupperrequiresthe Christian’sresponsibleparticipationinChrist’sbodybysharingeachother. Finally,implicitinthedescriptionofthepracticesofbothsacramentsis anunderstandingofimportanceofforgivenessinChristianlife.Gregory Jonesnotesthat“communitiesthatcomeintobeingbearingthenameof 16)Calvin,p.1385. 17)Migliore,p.224. 18)Ibid.,p.225.
19)EnriqueDussel,Ethics and Community,trans.RobertR.Barr(NewYork: OrbisBooks,1988),p.66.
Christaretobecommunitiesinwhichforgiveness,notpunishment,isthe norm.”21)SinceChristiancommunityistobeshapedintheonenesswith
ChristthroughtheforgivenessofGod,membersofChristiancommunities cannotengageinunitywithChristwithoutforgivingeachother.Through the practices of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, Christian communities shouldrealizethattheirexistenceisbasedonChrist’sforgiveness,and thatthepracticeofforgivenessrelatestoeachChristian’sfriendshipin Christ.Thisforgivenessbringsnewlife,unionwithChrist,andpeacewithin Christiancommunitiesworldwide.
Bibliography
Calvin,John.Institutes of the Christian Religion.Volume2.EditedbyJohnT. McNeill.TranslatedbyFordLewisBattles.Philadelphia:WestminsterPress, n.d.
Dussel,Enrique.Ethics and Community.TranslatedbyRobertR.Barr.New York:OrbisBooks,1988.
Jones,L.Gregory.Transformed Judgment: Toward a Trinitarian Account of the Moral Life.London:UniversityofNotreDamePress,1990.
Migliore,DanielL.Faith Seeking Understanding: An Introduction to Christian Theology.GrandRapids:EerdmansPublishingC.,1991.
Wallace,RonaldS.Calvin’s Doctrine of the Word and Sacrament.GrandRapids: EerdmansPublishingCo.,1957.
21)L.GregoryJones,Transformed Judgment: Toward a Trinitarian Account of the Moral Life(London:UniversityofNotreDamePress,1990),p.147.