• 検索結果がありません。

SLIDES OF TALKS Akira Masuoka Halifax2013

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "SLIDES OF TALKS Akira Masuoka Halifax2013"

Copied!
17
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Hopf Algebraic Techniques Applied to

Super Algebraic Groups

Akira Masuoka (U. Tsukuba)

Halifax, June 6, 2013

(2)

0. Once upon a time

Around 1992, Moss Sweedler wrote for me a kind letter which contains a list suggesting applications of Hopf algebras, such as Hopf algebras and combinatorics

Hopf algebras and physics Hopf algebras and geometry Hopf algebras and probability. . .

So far, my list contains two,

Hopf algebras and Galois theory of differential/difference equations Hopf algebras and super algebraic groups

Let me talk about the second subject.

We work over a field k (unless otherwise stated).

(3)

1. What is an algebraic group?

An affine group (scheme) over k is a representable functor G : (ComAlgk) → (Grop).

It is uniquely represented by a com. Hopf algebra A. Thus, (AffineGroupk) ≃ (ComHopfAlgk)op,

G 7→ O(G ), Sp(A) 7→ A.

Here, Sp(A) : R 7→ Algk(A, R), a group under ∗.

By an algebraic group, we mean an affine group G = Sp(A) s.t. A is finitely generated. Thus,

(AlgGroupk) ≃ (AffineHopfAlgk)op

(4)

Hopf-algebraic study of algebraic groups

G. Hochschild char k = 0 using Lie algebras

M. Takeuchi characteristic-free using hyperalgebras

A hyperalgebra is a synonym of an irreducible cocom. Hopf alg. The hyperalgebra hy(G ) of an algebraic group G = Sp(A) is defined by

hy(G ) =

n>0

(A/(A+)n) inA (A+= Ker ε).

It coincides with U(Lie(G )) if char k = 0.

(5)

2. Invitation to the super (= Z

2

-graded) world

In what follows assume char k ̸= 2. A super vector space is a vector space

V = V0⊕ V1

graded by Z2= {0, 1}. The super vector spaces form a tensor category (SuperVecSpacek) w.r.t the tensor product

V ⊗ W =

i+j=0

(Vi⊗ Wj) ⊕

i+j=1

(Vi⊗ Wj),

and the unit object k (= k0). It is symmetric w.r.t. the super symmetry cV ,W : V ⊗ W −→ W ⊗ V given by

cV ,W(v ⊗ w) = (−1)|v | |w |w ⊗ v =

{−w ⊗ v if |v| = |w| = 1 w ⊗ v otherwise.

(6)

Algebras, Lie algebras, Hopf algebras, . . . in (VecSpacek, ⊗, k, twist)

are generalized, as purely even objects, by

super algebras, super Lie algebras, super Hopf algebras, . . . in (SuperVecSpacek, ⊗, k, cV ,W).

Example. V a vector space.

∧(V ) =

neven

n(V ) ⊕

n odd

n(V )

This is a super-com. (xy = (−1)|x| |y |yx), (super-)cocom. (super) Hopf algebra in which every v ∈ V is supposed to be odd

primitive. If dim V < ∞, this is self-dual.

(7)

3. Super groups from functorial viewpoint

A super affine group over k is a representable functor G : (SuperComAlgk) → (Group).

It is uniquely represented by a super-com. Hopf algebra A. (SuperAffineGroupk) ≃ (SuperComHopfAlgk)op,

G 7→ O(G ), SSp(A) 7→ A.

Here, SSp(A) : R 7→ SuperAlgk(A, R).

By a super algebraic group, we mean a super affine group G = SSp(A) s.t. A is finitely generated. Thus,

(SuperAlgGroupk) ≃ (SuperAffineHopfAlgk)op

(8)

To each super affine (algebraic) group G = SSp(A), there is associated an affine (algebraic) group,

G := G |(ComAlgk) : (ComAlgk) → (Group), which is represented by

A := A/(A1). Thus

G = Sp(A).

(9)

Example. V = V0⊕ V1, m = dim V0, n = dim V1. GLsupV = GL(m|n) : R 7→ SuperAutR(V ⊗ R) O(GLsupV ) = k[xij, ykℓ, det(X )−1, det(Y )−1] ⊗ ∧(pi ℓ, qkj)

(X P

Q Y )

=( xij pi ℓ qkj ykℓ

)

, 1 ≤ i, j ≤ m, 1 ≤ k, ℓ ≤ n.

(X P Q Y

)

=(X P Q Y

)

(XQ YP )

, ε(X P Q Y

)

=( I O

O I

) ,

S(X ) = (X − PY−1Q)−1, S(Y ) = (Y − QX−1P)−1, S(P) = −X−1PS(Y ), S(Q) = −Y−1QS(X ).

The associated algebraic group of GLsupV is GLV0× GLV1.

(10)

Characteristic-free study of super affine groups seems relatively new. Main sources of this talk are:

[M1] A. M., Quotient sheaves of algebraic supergroups are superschemes, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 202 (2005).

[M2] A. M., Harish-Chandra pairs for algebraic affine supergroup schemes over an arbitrary field, Transform. Groups 17 (2012). [MS] A. M., Taiki Shibata, Algebraic supergroups over a PID, on arXiv.

[MPS] A. M., Craig Pastro, Taiki Shibata, Integrals for algebraic supergroups, in preparation.

(11)

4. Main results

G = SSp(A) a super algebraic group. A := A/(A1) = O(G |(ComAlg

k)), an affine Hopf algebra.

WA:= A1/A+0A1= Tε(G )1, the odd part of the cotangent space of G at ε; this is a f.d. vector space.

A is regarded as a left A-comodule algebra along A → A.

Thm [M1]. ∃a counit-preserv. left A-comod. super algebra isom. A−→ A ⊗ ∧(W A).

Question. Can A recover from A, WA plus something else? Answer. Yes, byHarish-Chandra pairs, though we are going to present the result so that those pairs are not quoted explicitly.

(12)

Thm [MS]. G 7→ (hy(G ), G ) gives a category equivalence from

the connected super algebraic groups G to

the pairs (H, F ) of super hyperalgebras H and connected algebraic groups F s.t.

(i) the largest ordinary Hopf subalgebra H in H equals hy(F ), (ii) the vec. space P(H)1of odd primitives in H is finite-dim’nal, (iii) the adjoint action of H on P(H)1arises (uniquely) from an

F -module structure.

Note. If char k = 0, the second category is identified with

the pairs (L, F ) of f.d. super Lie algebras L and connected algebraic groups F s.t.

(i) L0= Lie(F ),

(iii) the adjoint action of L0on L1 arises (uniquely) from an F -module structure.

(13)

Let’s observe G 7→ (hy(G ), G ). Set A = O(G ), H = hy(G ). Then O(G ) = A := A/(A1). We have natural embeddings,

A ֒→ H, A ֒→ H.

Recall H⊂ H is the largest ordinary Hopf subalgebra. We have cano : H→ H, which is shown to be surjective.

Prop [MS]. We have a com. diagram of super algebras with counit,

H H⊗ ∧(WA)

A A ⊗ ∧(WA)

H-comodule isom.

A-comodule isom.

//

//

OO OO

It follows that A is characterized in the left H-comodule H as the largest A-subcomodule.

(14)

Assume G is a connected reductive group with a split maximal torus T . Then the characterization above proves:

Thm [MS]. There is a natural category isomorphism between

the super G -modules and

those locally finite super hy(G )-modules whose restricted hy(T )-module structures arise (uniquely) from T -module structures.

Remark [MS]. The last two theorems, with some minor modification, hold true when k is a PID. The first theorem then gives an alternative construction of the Chevalley super groups over Z,due to Fireosi and Gavarini, in a generalized situation.

(15)

5. Application 1—Cosemisimplicity

Def. A super algebraic group G is said to be linearly reductive, if every super G -module is semisimple, or equivalently if O(G ) is cosemisimple, i.e., Corad(O(G )) = O(G ).

Linearly reductive super algebraic groups are rather restricted. Thm (R. Weissauer 2009). k = k, char k = 0.

Linearly reductive super algebraic group are exhausted by (a lin. reductive alg. group) ⋉

r

Spo(1, 2r )nr,

where Spo(1, 2r ) denotes the orthosymplectic super group. Thm [M]. char k > 2.

A linearly reductive super algebraic group G is necessarily purely even, i.e., is an ordinary algebraic group. Hence by Nagata’s Theorem, O(G ) ⊗ k is spanned by group-likes.

(16)

6. Application 2—Integrals or co-Frobeinusness

An integral for a super algebraic group G = SSp(A) is a non-zero, left or right A-comodule map ϕ : A → k.

Recall A is said to be co-Frobenius if such a ϕ exists.

ϕ is said to be total if ϕ(1) = 1.

G is linearly reductive ⇔ G has a total integral.

As was seen, the last equiv. condition are rarely satisfied. Compare with: B. Sullivan: If an algebraic group has an integral, it is necessarily linearly reductive in most cases including the case char k = 0.

Fact. For a super algebraic group G , TFAE: (1) G has an integral;

(2) Every injective super G -module is projective;

(3) The injective hull of every finite-dim’nal super G -module is finite-dim’nal.

(17)

Thm [MPS]. For a super algebraic group G , TFAE: (i) G has an integral;

(ii) The associated algebraic group G := G |(ComAlgk) has an

integral.

Sullivan tells us that if char k = 0, Condition (ii) is equivalent to (iii) G is linearly reductive, or O(G ) is cosemisimple,

and if char k > 2, Condition (ii) is equivalent to

(iv) (G0k)red is a torus, or (O(G ) ⊗ k)/0 is a group algebra. Conclusion. In characteristic zero, we have many examples of co-Frobenius and non-cosemisimple super Hopf algebras, O(G ), which includes those for the Chevalley super groups G ; their bosonizations by Z2 are co-Frobenius and non-cosemisimple Hopf algebras.

参照

関連したドキュメント

Given a compact Hausdorff topological group G, we denote by O(G) the dense Hopf ∗-subalgebra of the commutative C ∗ -algebra C(G) spanned by the matrix coefficients of

In analogy with Aubin’s theorem for manifolds with quasi-positive Ricci curvature one can use the Ricci flow to show that any manifold with quasi-positive scalar curvature or

Poisson algebras of geodesic functions for the bordered Riemann surfaces Σ g,δ 1 and Σ g,δ 2 that differ only by distributions of marked points among their boundary components

Indeed, the proof of Theorem 1 presented in section 2 uses an idea of Mitidieri, which relies on the application of a Rellich type identity.. Section 3 is devoted to the proof of

We simultaneously generalize the theory of Tannaka duality in two ways: first, we replace Hopf algebras with weak Hopf algebras and strong monoidal functors with separable

We see that simple ordered graphs without isolated vertices, with the ordered subgraph relation and with size being measured by the number of edges, form a binary class of

Platonov conjectured, conversely, that finitely generated linear groups which are super- rigid must be of “arithmetic type.” We construct counterexamples to Platonov’s

In this paper, we prove that Conjecture 1.1 holds in all the covering groups of the symmetric and alternating groups, provided p is odd (Theorem 5.1).. The proof makes heavy use of