• 検索結果がありません。

Tax Incentive Disclosure

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "Tax Incentive Disclosure"

Copied!
3
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

2

2

0

0

1

1

0

0

T

T

A

A

X

X

I

I

N

N

C

C

E

E

N

N

T

T

I

I

V

V

E

E

D

D

I

I

S

S

C

C

L

L

O

O

S

S

U

U

R

R

E

E

A

A

N

N

D

D

A

A

C

C

C

C

O

O

U

U

N

N

T

T

A

A

B

B

I

I

L

L

I

I

T

T

Y

Y

R

R

E

E

P

P

O

O

R

R

T

T

I

I

N

N

G

G

D

Di

is

s

cl

c

lo

os

su

ur

re

e

i

is

s

F

Fi

ir

rs

st

t

S

St

te

ep

p,

,

b

bu

ut

t

A

An

na

al

ly

y

si

s

is

s

S

St

ti

il

ll

l

N

Ne

ee

ed

de

ed

d

Legislation was enacted in 2008 to require greater disclosure and accountability of six tax credits available to corporations. The legislation required that information be published documenting the companies using the credits, the value of the credits received, the jobs created or retained, as well as the wages and benefits offered. This information was to be presented in the Governo ’s p oposed state budget so that these tax expenditures could be considered as part of the budget deliberations.

Since these requirements went into effect, however, only the most basic information about which companies received the credits and the amount of credits received has been reported. Critical information about jobs, wages, and benefits has not been reported, leaving policymakers unable to evaluate whether these tax credits are cost effective tools for economic development.

The legislation required that information about six tax credits be released in three parts:

Part One, just released for the third year in a row by the Rhode Island Department of Revenue, lists the names and addresses of the recipients and the amount of the tax credits received during the previous fiscal year.

Part Two, was to report comprehensive information about the degree to which job creation and retention, wage and benefit goal requirements have been met, and is required to be released annually on or before October 15th. The first such report was due in October of 2008, but still has not been issued close to two years later. Without this information, it is not possible to judge the usefulness of the credits as a job development strategy.

Part Three requires the tax credit information to be presented in the State Budget so that these tax expenditures can be considered as part of the budget discussions. The Director of the Department of Revenue is required to provide to the General Assembly (as part of the annual State budget) and the public (via the internet) a comprehensive presentation on the total and individual costs of the tax credits, including the cost to the state during the preceding fiscal year, an estimate of anticipated costs for the current fiscal year and the fiscal year of the requested budget. The budget is also supposed to contain the total cost to the state for employees of the credit recipients who have been enrolled in RIte Care or RIte Share Health Insurance. Phase Three has yet to be implemented, as well.

H

H

I

I

G

G

H

H

L

L

I

I

G

G

H

H

T

T

S

S

F

F

R

R

O

O

M

M

T

T

H

H

E

E

2

2

0

0

1

1

0

0

T

T

A

A

X

X

I

I

N

N

C

C

E

E

N

N

T

T

I

I

V

V

E

E

D

D

I

I

S

S

C

C

L

L

O

O

S

S

U

U

R

R

E

E

A

A

N

N

D

D

A

A

C

C

C

C

O

O

U

U

N

N

T

T

A

A

B

B

I

I

L

L

I

I

T

T

Y

Y

R

R

E

E

P

P

O

O

R

R

T

T

I

I

N

N

G

G

P

P

A

A

R

R

T

T

O

O

N

N

E

E

These are the highlights from this year’s Part One report showing how much the state is forgoing in revenue to provide the tax credits and incentives, and which companies are benefitting from them.

The six tax credits that were analyzed for this report:

Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation Project Status Incentive for Innovation and Growth

Jobs Development Act

Distressed Areas Economic Revitalization Act – Enterprise Zones Mill Building and Economic Revitalization Act

Motion Picture Production Tax Credit

T

T

A

A

X

X

F

F

A

A

C

C

T

T

S

S

(2)

Loss of revenue in FY2010: In Fiscal Year 2010, tax credits reduced state revenues by $39.7 million. This was an increase of more than $6.5 million (or 20 percent) from FY2009. The increase was due primarily to increases in the amount of credits claimed through the RIEDC Project Status/Sales Tax Exemption and through the Jobs Development Act.

The largest loss of revenue ($21.3 million in FY2010) resulted from the Job Development Credit. This is an increase of almost 50% over the prior year. It is worth noting that the General Assembly approved legislation in 2009 that tightened the job creation standards (such as minimum hours worked, benefits and wages) fo co pa ies to ualify fo the c edit fo a y ew o eplace e t e ployees hi ed afte July 1, 2009.

The second largest loss of revenue ($9.4 million in FY2010) resulted from the Project Status/Sales Tax Exemption. While the number of taxpayers dropped from seven to four, the total amount of credits increased by 28 percent. The requirement that the General Assembly approve these credits prior to the issuance was repealed in 2009 and the RI Economic Development Corporation regained the authority to issue these credits upon review of the project.

The third largest loss in revenue($8.1 million in FY2010) resulted from the Motion Picture Credit. This credithas not reached its cap of $15.0 million for the third year in a row. Five recipients took advantage of these credits in FY2010, ranging from a credit of $98,271 claimed by Mulberry Tree LLC, to a credit of $5,069,323, claimed by Brotherhood Productions, Inc. for the series Brotherhood, a show that has since been cancelled.

The Enterprise Zone credits ($715,187 in FY2010) have declined in both number and value. The total value of credits declined by over $350,000 which is one third of the prior year value.

Loss of revenue for Fiscal Year 2008 through Fiscal Year 2010: Rhode Island General Fund revenues were reduced by $122.0 million over the past three years as a result of the six tax credits included in the report.

Over the past three years, 91 percent of all the credits ($122 million) went to only 10 taxpayers. The largest three recipient of credits were:

CVS Pharmacy: 43 percent ($52.2 million) of the credits reported.

FMR Corporation (Fidelity Investments): 15 percent ($18.6 million) of the credits reported.

(3)

The six tax credits that were analyzed for this report:

Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation Project Status: Provides for a sales and use tax exemption for the cost of construction materials and furnishings related to Economic Development projects.

Incentive for Innovation and Growth: A credit equal to 50 percent of any investment made in the company, but in no case shall the amount exceed $100,000.

Jobs Development Act: For Non-Telecommunications Companies, the credit, based on the number of new employees, can reduce the normal 9 percent tax rate down to 3 percent. For

Telecommunications Companies, the credit, which reduces the tax rate, is based on the number of new employees.

Distressed Areas Economic Revitalization Act – Enterprise Zones: A credit equal to 50 percent of the total amount of wages paid to new enterprise job employees, or 75 percent of the total amount of wages paid to new enterprise job employees who live in the enterprise zone.

Mill Building and Economic Revitalization Act: was repealed as of August 8, 2009, therefore no additional credits will be granted.

Motion Picture Production Tax Credit: allows for a credit equivalent to 25 percent of qualified production costs attributable to production expenditures made within the state.

FY2008 FY2009 FY2010

Rhode Island Economic Development Corporation Project Status

Total Taxpayers 13 7 6

Total Amount of Credits $ 18,253,364 $ 7,349,337 $ 9,398,554

Average Per Taxpayer $ 1,404,105 $ 1,049,905 $ 1,566,426

Incentive for Innovation and Growth

Total Taxpayers 4 5 2

Total Amount of Credits $ 305,000 $ 450,000 $ 200,000

Average Per Taxpayer $ 76,250 $ 90,000 $ 100,000

Jobs Development Act

Total Taxpayers 11 10 14

Total Amount of Credits $ 16,248,317 $ 14,197,311 $ 21,256,182

Average Per Taxpayer $ 1,477,120 $ 1,419,731 $ 1,518,299

Distressed Areas Economic Revitalization Act – Enterprise Zones

Total Taxpayers 88 58 40

Total Amount of Credits $ 1,549,149 $ 1,066,997 $ 715,187

Average Per Taxpayer $ 17,604 $ 18,396 $ 17,880

Mill Building and Economic Revitalization Act

Total Taxpayers 0 0 0

Total Amount of Credits $ - $ - $

-Average Per Taxpayer $ - $ - $

-Motion Picture Production Tax Credit

Total Taxpayers 4 8 5

Total Amount of Credits $ 12,788,434 $ 10,052,553 $ 8,112,990

Average Per Taxpayer $ 3,197,109 $ 1,256,569 $ 1,622,598

Total Taxpayers 120 88 67

Taxpayers Receiving Multiple Credits 2 1 2 Net Number of Taxpayers 118 87 65

Total Amount of Credits $ 49,144,264 $ 33,116,198 $ 39,682,913

Three Year Total $ 121,943,375

参照

関連したドキュメント

We recall here the de®nition of some basic elements of the (punctured) mapping class group, the Dehn twists, the semitwists and the braid twists, which play an important.. role in

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

We show that a discrete fixed point theorem of Eilenberg is equivalent to the restriction of the contraction principle to the class of non-Archimedean bounded metric spaces.. We

Keywords: continuous time random walk, Brownian motion, collision time, skew Young tableaux, tandem queue.. AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary:

Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,

This paper develops a recursion formula for the conditional moments of the area under the absolute value of Brownian bridge given the local time at 0.. The method of power series

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

Our method of proof can also be used to recover the rational homotopy of L K(2) S 0 as well as the chromatic splitting conjecture at primes p > 3 [16]; we only need to use the