• 検索結果がありません。

PS2 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

シェア "PS2 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Problem Set 2: Due on May 10

Advanced Microeconomics I (Spring, 1st, 2012)

1. Question 1 (2 points)

Suppose the production function f satisfies (i) f (0) = 0, (ii) increasing, (iii) con- tinuous, (iv) quasi-concave, and (v) constant returns to scale. Then, show that f must be a concave function of x.

2. Question 2 (6 points)

(a) Suppose the utility function is continuous and strictly increasing. Then, show that the associated indirect utility function v(p, ω) is quasi-convex in (p, ω). (b) Show that the (minimum) expenditure function e(p, u) is concave in p.

(c) A real-valued function f (·) is called superaddittive if f(x1+ x2) ≥ f (x1) + f (x2).

Show that every cost function is superadditive in prices. Use this property to prove that the cost function is nondecreasing in input prices.

3. Question 3 (4 points)

The consumer buys the bundles xi at prices pi for i = 0, 1. Separately for parts (a) to (d), state whether these indicated choices satisfy the weak axiom of revealed preference:

(a) p0 = (1, 3), x0 = (4, 2); p1 = (3, 5), x1 = (3, 1). (b) p0 = (1, 6), x0 = (10, 5); p1 = (3, 5), x1 = (15, 4).

(c) p0 = (1, 2), x0 = (3, 1); p1 = (2, 2), x1 = (1, 2). (d) p0 = (2, 6), x0 = (20, 10); p1 = (3, 5), x1 = (25, 8). 4. Question 4 (4 points)

A consumer’s utility function is given as

u(x, y) = min(αx, βy)

where α, β > 0. Let p, q > 0 be the prices for good x and y respectively. Then, answer the following questions.

(a) Derive the Marshallian demand function. (b) Find the indirect utility function.

(c) Find the (minimum) expenditure function. (d) Derive the Hicksian demand function.

1

(2)

5. Question 5 (4 points)

A firm has a production function given by f (x1, x2, x3, x4) = min{x

1 3

1x

2 3

2, x3+ 2x4}.

Let w = (w1, w2, w3, w4) ≫ 0 be factor prices and y be an (target) output.

(a) Does the production function exhibit increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale? Explain.

(b) Calculate the conditional input demand function for factors 1 and 2. (c) Suppose w3 > w24. Then, derive the cost function c(w, y).

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

Oscillatory Integrals, Weighted and Mixed Norm Inequalities, Global Smoothing and Decay, Time-dependent Schr¨ odinger Equation, Bessel functions, Weighted inter- polation

Using the T-accretive property of T q in L 2 (Ω) proved below and under additional assumptions on regularity of initial data, we obtain the following stabilization result for the

We shall see below how such Lyapunov functions are related to certain convex cones and how to exploit this relationship to derive results on common diagonal Lyapunov function (CDLF)

“Breuil-M´ezard conjecture and modularity lifting for potentially semistable deformations after

We give another global upper bound for Jensen’s discrete inequal- ity which is better than already existing ones.. For instance, we determine a new converses for generalized A–G and

Going back to the packing property or more gener- ally to the λ-packing property, it is of interest to answer the following question: Given a graph embedding G and a positive number

discrete ill-posed problems, Krylov projection methods, Tikhonov regularization, Lanczos bidiago- nalization, nonsymmetric Lanczos process, Arnoldi algorithm, discrepancy

In section 4 we use this coupling to show the uniqueness of the stationary interface, and then finish the proof of theorem 1.. Stochastic compactness for the width of the interface