• 検索結果がありません。

論文はこちらへ mist RE2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "論文はこちらへ mist RE2010"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Concept of Water Mist System and Control

This development is based on the idea that if it is possible to supply evapotranspiration from plants into the air in the form of fine particle size water mist that easily evaporates, it may help to mitigate the heat island effects by utilizing the cooling effects it produces, without depending on green.

The installation examples of the Water mist system increase, and a performance evaluation result is provided by actual field experiment. According to these results, air temperature fall down of 3-4 degree C could be obtained by using Water mist system. In addition, it is proved that water mist system have influenced to thermal comfortable.

As for the control parameter of the Water mist system, air temperature, humidity, the wind velocity, the rain fall are considered. Especially, air temperature and humidity must be discussed because other parameter will not be determined by cooling effect of water mist.

Table 1. Empirical Control Strategy for Spray

To be start

(If all conditions shown below are

satisfied)

To be stopped

(If any conditions shown below are

satisfied) Outdoor

air temp.

31 Degree C. above 30 Degree C. under Outdoor

air

Humidity

60% Rh under 70% Rh above

Air velocity

When mean velocity during 10 minutes is

under 3.0 m/s

3.0 m/s above

Rain fall No rain Rain

Vapor air 33

31 City Water

Water Pump Valve Control Equipment

Optional

Sensor (Optional)

Dry Bulb

Air Humidity Air Velocity

Solar radiation Water Mist

Obtain

Evaporative cooling

Outline of System

5 10 15 20 25 30

15 20 25 30 35

Dry Bulb

Abs. Humidityg/kg'

100% 90% 80%

70% 60%

Mist Spray Zone

(Empirical)

Water Mist Spray Condition

(2)

CFD Analysis

50m

4m 15m 15m 3.5m

7.5m

horizontal solar

radiation: 363W/ inflow velocity: 0.1m/s

spray position

X Z Y

atmospheric pressure

Mass flow rate 0.83 g/s Water temperature 28.0 °C

Spray cone angle 50 ° Injection pressure 6 MPa

Boundary Conditions

Thermal conductivity : 0.11 W/m·K Solar absorptance :10.8 %

Solar transmittance : 13.7% Roof top

surface (z=4m) PVC-coated

glass-fiber

plain-weave Heat transfer coefficient : 23 W/m2·K Thermal conductivity : 1.4W/m·K

Solar absorptance : 60 % Ground

surface (z=0m) Concrete

paved Heat transfer coefficient : 23 W/m2·K Upwind : air velocity, 0.1 m/s

Upwind / Downwind flow

boundary Downwind : atmospheric pressure Free-slip

Side surface

(y=0,

y=15) Adiabatic boundary

Boundary conditions

Spraying conditions

Diagram of calculation domain

Fluent 6.3 was used for this numerical analysis. The Discrete Phase Model was used and we considered the interaction between the mist particles and air, including heat transfer, phase changes, and the momentum conservation law. Also, we adopted the pressure-swirl atomizer model to analyze the nozzle spray conditions shown below.

Analysis Results

Temperature difference contour diagram at outdoor temperature

and humidity conditions of 34°C and 60% RH, respectively

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 40%RH 60%RH 70%RH 75%RH

残存粒子量  [g]

高さ [m]

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 60%RH 70%RH 75%RH 80%RH

残存粒子量  [g]

高さ [m]

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0

残存粒子量  [g]

高さ [m]

GL 0.250.00 GL 0.750.50 GL 1.251.00 GL 1.751.50 GL 2.252.00 GL 2.752.50 GL 3.253.00 GL 3.753.50

高さ [m]

Mass of Remaining Particles [g]

(a) D.B. 30 (b) D.B. 34 Height [m]

Histograms of mass of remaining particles under different humidity at specific outdoor

temperature

X=13.0m X=26.0m

Z=1.5m Z=0.0m Z=4.0m [ Y=7.5m ]

X=13.0m X=26.0m Y=4.0m

+1.0 0.0 -1.0 -2.0

Diff. of Temp. [K] Ambient Temp.

X=13.0m X=26.0m

Z=1.5m Z=0.0m Z=4.0m [ Y=7.5m ]

X=13.0m X=26.0m Y=4.0m

X=13.0m X=26.0m

Z=1.5m Z=0.0m Z=4.0m [ Y=7.5m ]

X=13.0m X=26.0m Y=4.0m

a. 30/80%RH

b. 30/60%RH

c. 34/60%RH

Discussion and Conclusion

5 10 15 20 25 30

15 20 25 30 35

Dry Bulb

Abs. Humidityg/kg'

100% 90% 80%

70% 60%

DI 85 DI 80

DI 75 Mist Spray Zone (Empirical)

No Spray,

But uncomfort

5 10 15 20 25 30

15 20 25 30 35

Dry Bulb

Abs. Humidityg/kg'

100% 90% 80%

70% 60%

SET* 35 SET* 30

SET* 25 Mist Spray Zone (Empirical)

No Spray,

But uncomfort

5 10 15 20 25 30

15 20 25 30 35

Dry Bulb

Abs. Humidityg/kg'

100% 90% 80%

70% 60%

Mist Spray Zone (Proposal)

In the case of 80% humidity, the particles that descended near the ground evaporated, creating a large temperature decrease in the space. However, in the case of 70% humidity, the particles vaporized rapidly, and the particles evaporate at higher level than the case of 80% humidity.

This phenomenon also affected the remaining height of particles. It was found out that the air humidity is a important element when the mist system is controlled.

There is no spray zone outside of empirical spray zone with considering SET* and discomfort index(DI).

The proper control strategy for humidity is 70% rh, and air temperature is 28.5 or 29 degree Celsius.

Table 1. Empirical Control Strategy for Spray
Diagram of calculation domain

参照

関連したドキュメント

We have formulated and discussed our main results for scalar equations where the solutions remain of a single sign. This restriction has enabled us to achieve sharp results on

Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,

We shall see below how such Lyapunov functions are related to certain convex cones and how to exploit this relationship to derive results on common diagonal Lyapunov function (CDLF)

The idea of applying (implicit) Runge-Kutta methods to a reformulated form instead of DAEs of standard form was first proposed in [11, 12], and it is shown that the

We prove that for some form of the nonlinear term these simple modes are stable provided that their energy is large enough.. Here stable means orbitally stable as solutions of

7.1. Deconvolution in sequence spaces. Subsequently, we present some numerical results on the reconstruction of a function from convolution data. The example is taken from [38],

In section 4 we use this coupling to show the uniqueness of the stationary interface, and then finish the proof of theorem 1.. Stochastic compactness for the width of the interface

We will study the spreading of a charged microdroplet using the lubrication approximation which assumes that the fluid spreads over a solid surface and that the droplet is thin so