• 検索結果がありません。

Final1 11 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

シェア "Final1 11 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Eco 600E: Advanced Microeconomics I (Spring, 1st, 2011)

Final Exam: June 5

1. True or False (15 points)

Answer whether each of the following statements is true (T) or false (F). You do NOT need to explain the reason.

(a) Suppose % is represented by utility function u( ). Then, u( ) is concave ONLY IF % is convex.

(b) Marshallian demand of some good CAN be increasing in its own price.

(c) It can NEVER happen that a production function shows both (strictly) de- creasing and increasing returns to scale.

(d) If the relative risk aversion of some risk averse decision maker is independent of her wealth, then her absolute risk aversion MUST be decreasing in wealth. (e) The competitive equilibrium in exchange economy ALWAYS exists when all

agents have monotone preferences. 2. Consumer Theory (20 points)

Consider a consumer who has monotone preferences. Let v(p; !) and e(p; u) denote her indirect utility function and expenditure function, respectively.

(a) Show that v(p; !) is strictly increasing in !.

(b) State the de…nition of normal goods, either verbally or mathematically. (c) Show that good j is a normal good if and only if @p@2e

j@u >0.

Hint: You can use the duality, xj(p; !) = xhj(p; v(p; !)). 3. Producer Theory (25 points)

A …rm has a production function given by f (x1; x2; x3; x4) = minfx

1 3

1x

2 3

2; x3+ 2x4g.

Let w = (w1; w2; w3; w4) be factor prices and y be an (target) output.

(a) Does the production function exhibit increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale? Explain.

(b) Calculate the conditional input demand function for factors 1 and 2. (c) Suppose w3 > w24. Then, derive the cost function c(w; y).

1

(2)

4. Uncertainty (20 points)

Consider the following three lotteries, L1; L2 and L3: L1 :

50 dollars with probability 12

150 dollars with probability 12 L2 :

100 dollars with probability 23 200 dollars with probability 13

L3 :

8

< :

50 dollars with probability 13 150 dollars with probability 59 300 dollars with probability 19

Answer the following questions:

(a) Suppose that a decision maker prefers for sure return of 90 dollars rather than L1. Then, can we conclude that she is (i) risk averse or (ii) not risk loving? Explain.

(b) Show that any risk averse decision maker whose preference satis…es indepen- dence axiom must prefer L2 to L3.

5. General Equilibrium (30 points)

Ann and Bob are stranded on a desert island. Each has some slices of ham (H) and cheese (C). More precisely, suppose that Ann initially had 40H and 80C and Bob had 60H and 120C. The utility function for Ann and Bob are given by uA= min(H;C2) and uB = 4H + 3C.

(a) Draw the Edgeworth box diagram and indicate the contract curve in the box. (b) Derive the competitive equilibrium (both price ratio and allocation). Who does become strictly better o¤ by the transaction in the competitive market? (c) Show that competitive equilibrium price (ratio) is independent of initial en-

dowments.

The allocation is called “envy-free” if ui(xi) ui(xj) holds for every pair of people fi; jg where xi is i’s consumption bundle and xj is j’s consumption bundle.

(d) Derive an envy-free and Pareto e¢cient allocation in our problem. Show that it is unique.

(e) Now suppose that the government tries to achieve the allocation in (d) through the transfer of initial endowment of ham (H), combined with the market trans- action afterwards. How much slices of ham should the government transfer from Bob to Ann?

2

参照

関連したドキュメント

Also, for the sake of comparison we give the probability density functions of the terminal wealth of portfolios managed by the pure bond strategy, whose fraction of wealth invested

Reference mortgage portfolio Selected, RMBS structured credit reference portfolio risk, market valuation, liquidity risk, operational misselling, SIB issues risk, tranching

Considering the optimal tactical decisions regarding service level, transfer price, and marketing expenditure, manufacturer of the new SC has to decide how to configure his

We establish a strong law of large numbers (SLLN) and a central limit theorem (CLT) for the sequence of profits of the ensemble of N players in both settings (random mixture

For the risk process in Theorem 3, we conducted a simulation study to demonstrate the relationships between the non-ruin probability, the initial capital and the revenue coefficient

In the previous section we have established a sample-path large deviation principle on a finite time grid; this LDP provides us with logarithmic asymptotics of the probability that

Since the optimizing problem has a two-level hierarchical structure, this risk management algorithm is composed of two types of swarms that search in different levels,

The proposed model in this study builds upon recent developments of integrated supply chain design models that simultaneously consider location, inventory, and shipment decisions in