Hopf Algebraic Techniques Applied to
Super Algebraic Groups
Akira Masuoka (U. Tsukuba)
Boston, April 7, 2013
0. What is a space?
Functorial viewpoint: A space (over k) is a functor defined on the category (ComAlgk) of com. algebras.
Geometric viewpoint: It is a ringed space (X , OX).
Want to show that the functorial (≑ Hopf-algebraic) viewpoint is effective for algebraic groups, and even more so for super algebraic groups.
Work over a field k (unless otherwise stated).
1. What is an algebraic group?
An affine group (scheme) over k is a representable functor G : (ComAlgk) → (Group).
It is uniquely represented by a com. Hopf algebra A. Thus, (AffineGroupk) ≃ (ComHopfAlgk)op,
G 7→ O(G ), Sp(A) 7→ A.
Here, Sp(A) : R 7→ Algk(A, R), a group under ∗.
By an algebraic group, we mean an affine group G = Sp(A) s.t. A is finitely generated. Thus,
(AlgGroupk) ≃ (AffineHopfAlgk)op
Hopf-algebraic study of algebraic groups
G. Hochschild char k = 0 using Lie algebras
M. Takeuchi characteristic-free using hyperalgebras
A hyperalgebra is a synonym of an irreducible cocom. Hopf alg. The hyperalgebra hy(G ) of an algebraic group G = Sp(A) is defined by
hy(G ) = ∪
n>0
(A/(A+)n)∗ inA∗ (A+= Ker ε).
It coincides with U(Lie(G )) if char k = 0.
2. Invitation to the super (= Z
2-graded) world
In what follows assume char k ̸= 2. A super vector space is a vector space
V = V0⊕ V1
graded by Z2= {0, 1}. The super vector spaces form a tensor category (SuperVecSpacek) w.r.t the tensor product
V ⊗ W = ⊕
i+j=0
(Vi⊗ Wj) ⊕ ⊕
i+j=1
(Vi⊗ Wj),
and the unit object k (= k0). It is symmetric w.r.t. the super symmetry cV ,W : V ⊗ W −→ W ⊗ V given by≃
cV ,W(v ⊗ w ) = (−1)|v | |w |w ⊗ v =
{−w ⊗ v if |v | = |w | = 1 w ⊗ v otherwise.
Algebras, Lie algebras, Hopf algebras, . . . in (VecSpacek, ⊗, k, twist)
are generalized, as purely even objects, by
super algebras, super Lie algebras, super Hopf algebras, . . . in (SuperVecSpacek, ⊗, k, cV ,W).
Example. V a vector space.
∧(V ) = ⊕
neven
∧n(V ) ⊕ ⊕
n odd
∧n(V )
This is a super-com. (xy = (−1)|x| |y |yx), (super-)cocom. (super) Hopf algebra in which every v ∈ V is supposed to be odd
primitive. If dim V < ∞, this is self-dual.
3. Super groups from the functorial viewpoint
A super affine group over k is a representable functor G : (SuperComAlgk) → (Group).
It is uniquely represented by a super-com. Hopf algebra A. (SuperAffineGroupk) ≃ (SuperComHopfAlgk)op,
G 7→ O(G ), SSp(A) 7→ A.
Here, SSp(A) : R 7→ Z2-GrAlgk(A, R).
By a super algebraic group, we mean a super affine group G = SSp(A) s.t. A is finitely generated. Thus,
(SuperAlgGroupk) ≃ (SuperAffineHopfAlgk)op
Example. V = V0⊕ V1, m = dim V0, n = dim V1. GLV = GL(m|n) : R 7→ Z2-GrAutR(V ⊗ R) O(GLV) = k[xij, ykℓ, det(X )−1, det(Y )−1] ⊗ ∧(pi ℓ, qkj)
(X P
Q Y )
=( xij pi ℓ qkj ykℓ
)
, 1 ≤ i, j ≤ m, 1 ≤ k, ℓ ≤ n.
∆(X P Q Y
)
=(X P Q Y
)
⊗(X P Q Y
)
, ε(X P Q Y
)
=( I O
O I
) ,
S(X ) = (X − PY−1Q)−1, S(Y ) = (Y − QX−1P)−1, S(P) = −X−1PS(Y ), S(Q) = −Y−1QS(X ).
Characteristic-free study of super affine groups seems relatively new. Main sources of this talk are:
[MZ] A. M., Alexadr Zubkov, Quotient sheaves of algebraic supergroups are superschemes, J. Algebra 348 (2011).
[M] A. M., Harish-Chandra pairs for algebraic affine supergroup schemes over an arbitrary field, Transform. Groups .
[MS] A. M., Taiki Shibata, Algebraic supergroups over a PID, in preparation.
[MP] A. M., Craig Pastro, Integrals for algebraic supergroups, in preparation.
4. The quotient G ˜/H
Thm [MZ]. G = SSp(A) a super algebraic group, H = SSp(A/I ) a closed super subgroup. The k-sheaf G ˜/H obtained as the sheafification of the ‘naive’ functor
R 7→ G (R)/H(R), the cosets
is a Noether super scheme, i.e., has a finite covering of open sub-functors represented by Noether super com. algebras.
Note. A functor X : (SuperComAlgk) → (Set) is called a k-sheaf (under the fppf topology), if
(i) X (∏nı=1Ri) ≃∏nı=1X (Ri),
(ii) for R → S in (SuperComAlgk) s.t. S is faithfully flat and finitely presented over R,
1 → X (R) → X (S) ⇒ X (S ⊗RS) is exact.
Given G = SSp(A) as above, the restriction of the domain gives an algebraic group,
G := G |(ComAlg
k) : (ComAlgk) → (Group), which is represented by
A := A/(A1).
Thm [MZ]. H < G super algebraic groups as above. There are associated algebraic groups, H < G . Then
G ˜/H is affine ⇔ G ˜/H is affine.
▶ These equivalent conditions hold if H ◁ G .
▶ In particular, G ˜/H is affine if H is reductive; a positive answer to J. Brundan’s question.
5. A key result—Tensor product decomposition
G = SSp(A) a super algebraic group. A := A/(A1) = O(G |(ComAlg
k)), an affine Hopf algebra.
WA:= A1/A+0A1= Tε∗(G )1, the odd part of the cotangent space of G at ε; this is a f.d. vector space.
A is regarded as a left A-comodule algebra along A → A.
Thm(A.M.) ∃a counit-preserv. left A-comod. super algebra isom. A−→ A ⊗ ∧(W≃ A)
The proof uses Cleftness Theorem due to Doi and Takeuchi. Question. Can A recover from A, WA plus something else? Answer. Yes, by Harish-Chandra pairs!
6. Harish-Chandra pairs—Hopf-algebraic formulation
A Harish-Chandra pair is a pair (C , W ) of an affine Hopf algebra C and a f.d. right C -comodule W which is accompanied with a bracket [ , ] : W∗× W∗ → P(C◦) satisfying some conditions. One can prove:
A 7→ (A, WA) gives a category equivalence
(SuperAffineHopfAlgk) ≈ (Harish-ChandraPairk).
A more Hopf-algebraic and useful reformulation (with the restriction “connected” added) is the following:
Thm [MS]. G 7→ (hy(G ), G ) gives a category equivalence from
▶ the connected super algebraic groups G to
▶ the pairs (H, F ) of super hyperalgebras H and connected algebraic groups F s.t.
(i) the largest ordinary Hopf subalgebra H in H equals hy(F ), (ii) the vec. space P(H)1of odd primitives in H is finite-dim’nal, (iii) the adjoint action of H on P(H)1arises (uniquely) from an
F -module structure.
Note. If char k = 0, the second category is identified with
▶ the pairs (L, F ) of f.d. super Lie algebras L and connected algebraic groups F s.t.
(i′) L0= Lie(F ),
(iii′) the adjoint action of L0on L1 arises (uniquely) from an F -module structure.
Let’s observe G 7→ (hy(G ), G ). Set A = O(G ), H = hy(G ). Then O(G ) = A := A/(A1). We have natural embeddings,
A ֒→ H◦, A ֒→ H◦.
Recall H ⊂ H is the largest ordinary Hopf subalgebra. We have cano : H◦→ H◦, which is shown to be surjective.
Prop [MS]. We have a com. diagram of super algebras with counit,
H◦ H◦⊗ ∧(WA)
A A ⊗ ∧(WA)
H◦-comodule isom.
A-comodule isom.
≃ //
≃ //
OO OO
⟲
It follows that A is characterized in the left H◦-comodule H◦ as the largest A-subcomodule.
Assume G is a connected reductive group with a split maximal torus T . Then the characterization above proves:
Thm [MS]. There is a natural category isomorphism between
▶ the super G -modules and
▶ those locally finite super hy(G )-modules whose restricted hy(T )-module structures arise (uniquely) from T -module structures.
Remark [MS]. The last two theorems, with some minor modification, hold true when k is a PID. The first theorem then gives an alternative construction of the Chevalley supergroups over Z,due to Fioresi and Gavarini, in a generalized situation.
7. Application—characterizations of 3 classes
Class 1. Simply connected super algebraic groups
Def. A connected super algebraic group G is said to be simply connected, if an epimorphism η : F ↠ G of connected super algebraic groups with Ker η purely even, finite etale is necessarily isomorphic.
Thm in char zero (cf. Hochschild 1970). k = k, char k = 0. G 7→ Lie(G ) gives a bijection, modulo isom., from
▶ the simply connected super algebraic groups G to
▶ the f.d. super Lie algebras L s.t. (i) RadL0 is nilpotent,
(ii) adn(L0)(L1) = 0 for some n > 0.
Thm in positive char (cf. Takeuchi 1975). k perfect, char k > 2.
G 7→ hy(G ), H 7→ Sp(H◦) give a category equivalence between
▶ the simply connected super algebraic groups G and
▶ the super hyperalgebras H s.t.
(i) the super Lie algebra P(H) of all primitives in H is finite-dim’nal,
(ii) the abelianization Hab of the largest ordinary Hopf subalgebra H of H is finite-dim’nal,
(iii) H is proper, i.e., ∩
dim H/I <∞
I = 0.
Class 2. Unipotent super algebraic groups
Def. A super algebraic group G is said to be unipotent, if simple super G -modules are exhausted by the purely even or odd trivial super G -module k, or equivalently if O(G ) is irreducible, i.e., Corad(O(G )) = k.
Thm [M] (A. Zubkov). G is unipotent if and only if G = G |(ComAlgk) is unipotent.
Class 3. Linearly reductive super algebraic groups
Def. A super algebraic group G is said to be linearly reductive, if every super G -module is semisimple, or equivalently if O(G ) is cosemisimple, i.e., Corad(O(G )) = O(G ).
Linearly reductive super algebraic groups are rather restricted.
Linearly reductive super algebraic groups are rather restricted.
Thm (R. Weissauer 2009). k = k, char k = 0.
Linearly reductive super algebraic groups are exhausted by (a lin. reductive alg. group) ⋉∏
r
Spo(1, 2r )nr,
where Spo(1, 2r ) denotes the orthosymplectic super group.
Thm [M]. char k > 2.
A linearly reductive super algebraic group G is necessarily purely even, i.e., is an ordinary algebraic group. Hence by Nagata’s Theorem, O(G ) ⊗ k is spanned by group-likes.
8. Existence of Integrals
An integral for a super algebraic group G = SSp(A) is a non-zero, left or right A-comodule map ϕ : A → k.
▶ Recall A is said to be co-Frobenius if such a ϕ exists.
▶ ϕ is said to be total if ϕ(1) = 1.
G is linearly reductive ⇔ G has a total integral.
▶ As was seen, the last equiv. condition are rarely satisfied. Compare with: B. Sullivan: If an algebraic group has an integral, it is necessarily linearly reductive, either if char k = 0 or if the algebraic group is connected.
Fact. For a super algebraic group G , TFAE: (1) G has an integral;
(2) Every injective super G -module is projective;
(3) The injective hull of every finite-dim’nal super G -module is finite-dim’nal.
Thm [MP]. A super algebraic group G has an integral if and only if the associated algebraic group G := G |(ComAlgk) has an integral.
As consequences, we have:
▶ Suppose G is connected reductive. (i) If char k = 0, then G has an integral.
(ii) If char k > 2, then G does not have any integral unless G is a torus.
The conclusions hold true for the Chevalley super groups.
▶ We have many examples of co-Frobenius and
non-cosemisimple super Hopf algebras, O(G ), in char. zero; their bosonizations by Z2 are co-Frobenius and
non-cosemisimple Hopf algebras.