• 検索結果がありません。

PS2 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

シェア "PS2 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website"

Copied!
1
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Problem Set 2: Posted on November 4

Advanced Microeconomics I (Fall, 1st, 2014)

1. Question 1 (7 points)

A real-valued function f (x) is called homothetic if f (x) = g(h(x)) where g : R → R is a strictly increasing function and h is a real-valued function which is homo- geneous of degree 1. Suppose that preferences can be represented by a homothetic utility function. Then, prove the following statements.

(a) The marginal rate of substitution between any two goods depends only on the ratio of the demands consumed. That is M RSij is identical whenever xi

xj

takes the same value.

(b) The cross price derivatives of Marshallian demands are identical, i.e.,

∂xi(p, I)

∂pj =

∂xj(p, I)

∂pi . 2. Question 2 (8 points)

The consumer buys the bundles xi at prices pi for i = 0, 1. Separately for parts (a) to (d), state whether these indicated choices satisfy the weak axiom of revealed preference:

(a) p0 = (1, 3), x0 = (4, 2); p1 = (3, 5), x1 = (3, 1). (b) p0 = (1, 6), x0 = (10, 5); p1 = (3, 5), x1 = (15, 4).

(c) p0 = (1, 2), x0 = (3, 1); p1 = (2, 2), x1 = (1, 2). (d) p0 = (2, 6), x0 = (20, 10); p1 = (3, 5), x1 = (25, 8). 3. Question 3 (6 points)

Prove that if a firm exhibits increasing returns to scale then average cost must strictly decrease with output.

4. Question 4 (9 points)

A firm has a production function given by f (x1, x2, x3, x4) = min{x

1 3

1x

2 3

2, x3+ 2x4}.

Let w = (w1, w2, w3, w4) ≫ 0 be factor prices and y be an (target) output.

(a) Does the production function exhibit increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale? Explain.

(b) Calculate the conditional input demand function for factors 1 and 2. (c) Suppose w3 > w24. Then, derive the cost function c(w, y).

1

参照

関連したドキュメント

Zaslavski, Generic existence of solutions of minimization problems with an increas- ing cost function, to appear in Nonlinear

In [10, 12], it was established the generic existence of solutions of problem (1.2) for certain classes of increasing lower semicontinuous functions f.. Note that the

It can be easily shown, however, that if we wish to deal with the class of all (state-dependent, increasing) utility functions, then the only way to implement the decision $ by means

It can be easily shown, however, that if we wish to deal with the class of all (state-dependent, increasing) utility functions, then the only way to implement the decision $ by means

We give another global upper bound for Jensen’s discrete inequal- ity which is better than already existing ones.. For instance, we determine a new converses for generalized A–G and

Thus, it follows from Remark 5.7.2, (i), that if every absolutely characteristic MLF is absolutely strictly radical, then we conclude that the absolute Galois group Gal(k/k (d=1) )

Recently, Zhou and Fan in [8] proved a regularity criterion for another system of partial differential equations modelling nematic liquid crystal flows, which is considered by Sun

If the inequality defined by (1.1) holds for all nonnegative functions f, then {S n , n ≥ 1} is a sub- martingale with respect to the natural choice of σ-algebras.. A martingale