• 検索結果がありません。

Percentage of Grades 1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "Percentage of Grades 1"

Copied!
2
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

InSPSE,thereisaprincipleofconductingrelativeevaluationexceptforforeignlanguagecoursesandcourseswithasmallnumberofstudentslessthan30. Thepercentageofgradesisasfollows.

<Percentagesbasedontherelativeassessmentsystem> Approx.70%Approx.30% Notapplicabletogradingcurve Approx.30%

Within10% Score

100to90 points

89to80 points

79to70 points

69to60 points

59to45 points

44to0 points

Didnottake examination

Gradeshownontranscript A+ A B C

Gradeshownongradenotification A+ A B C F G H

Pass/Fail

Example:

CourseTitle A+ A B C F G H

AnalysisofJapaneseEconomy01 2.4% 33.3% 42.9% 11.9% 7.1% 2.4% 6.7%

CourseTitle A+ A B C F G H

AnalysisofJapaneseEconomy01 2.4% 33.3% 42.9% 11.9% 7.1% 2.4% 6.7%

AreaandCulturalStudies(NorthAmerica) 01 12.0% 4.0% 32.0% 36.0% 8.0% 8.0% 28.6%

AsianEconomicDevelopment01 13.7% 16.9% 38.7% 21.8% 4.8% 4.0% 0.0%

AsianEconomy01 12.2% 26.8% 31.7% 19.5% 2.4% 7.3% 19.6%

BasicEconometrics01 6.9% 34.5% 44.8% 10.3% 0.0% 3.4% 14.7%

BehavioralEconomics 01 9.7% 19.4% 42.4% 26.1% 0.0% 2.4% 7.8%

ChineseEconomy01 20.0% 31.4% 11.4% 11.4% 0.0% 25.7% 0.0%

ComparativeDemocratization 01 11.8% 17.6% 45.1% 19.6% 5.9% 0.0% 8.9%

ComparativeEconomicHistoryA01 0.0% 13.3% 18.7% 25.3% 14.7% 28.0% 1.3%

ContemporaryJapanesePolitics01 21.9% 18.8% 34.4% 25.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5.9%

EastAsianCommunity01 13.4% 28.4% 37.3% 11.9% 4.5% 4.5% 0.0%

EconomicsofHumanResourceManagement01 11.5% 26.0% 40.6% 13.5% 1.0% 7.3% 0.0%

EconomicsofResourcesandFood01 8.6% 28.6% 51.4% 8.6% 0.0% 2.9% 2.8%

EthicsandWorldPolitics01 16.7% 46.7% 23.3% 13.3% 0.0% 0.0% 14.3%

ExperimentalEconomics01 79.4% 20.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 8.1%

Finance01 26.3% 15.8% 26.3% 5.3% 21.1% 5.3% 13.6%

GenderinGlobalPolitics 01 3.6% 37.5% 35.7% 16.1% 0.0% 7.1% 5.1%

GlobalPolitics01 16.4% 52.5% 18.0% 1.6% 4.9% 6.6% 0.0%

InternationalAdministration01 20.0% 40.0% 36.7% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2%

InternationalMacroeconomicPolicy 01 9.1% 16.4% 29.1% 27.3% 5.5% 12.7% 9.8%

InternationalMicroeconomicPolicy 01 10.6% 16.7% 31.8% 37.9% 3.0% 0.0% 9.6%

InternationalPoliticalEconomy 01 44.9% 34.6% 7.9% 11.0% 0.0% 1.6% 4.5%

InternationalRelationsofPost-WarJapan 01 11.5% 22.1% 38.2% 26.0% 2.3% 0.0% 5.8%

IntroductiontoContemporaryPoliticalAnalysis 01 16.9% 37.1% 38.2% 6.7% 1.1% 0.0% 1.1%

IntroductiontoContemporaryPoliticalTheory 01 10.7% 22.7% 46.7% 13.3% 6.7% 0.0% 2.6%

IntroductiontoEastAsianStudies 01 12.7% 30.2% 22.2% 25.4% 7.9% 1.6% 14.9%

IntroductiontoGameTheoryforPoliticalEconomy 01 41.4% 17.1% 8.6% 18.6% 10.0% 4.3% 10.3%

IntroductiontoInternationalRelations 01 11.0% 17.6% 37.4% 24.2% 4.4% 5.5% 0.0%

IntroductiontoJapanesePoliticalEconomy 01 9.4% 18.8% 50.4% 19.7% 0.0% 1.7% 0.0%

IntroductiontoMacroeconomics01 1.0% 26.2% 39.8% 30.1% 2.9% 0.0% 3.7%

IntroductiontoMicroeconomics 01 16.3% 32.7% 34.6% 14.4% 1.9% 0.0% 2.8%

IntroductiontoStatistics01 8.3% 37.0% 32.4% 13.0% 6.5% 2.8% 3.6%

JapaninWorldPolitics 01 10.0% 24.4% 34.4% 28.9% 2.2% 0.0% 6.3%

JapaneseEconomicHistory 01 11.3% 35.0% 30.0% 15.0% 2.5% 6.3% 16.7%

JapaneseEconomy01 6.1% 28.0% 45.1% 12.2% 8.5% 0.0% 2.4%

JapanesePoliticalHistory 01 1.1% 28.7% 37.9% 17.2% 9.2% 5.7% 23.0%

LaborEconomics01 7.5% 22.5% 32.5% 22.5% 12.5% 2.5% 7.0%

LawandEconomics01 6.9% 31.7% 30.7% 19.8% 6.9% 4.0% 15.1%

LawandPoliticsinContemporaryJapan 01 27.9% 26.7% 19.8% 19.8% 0.0% 5.8% 1.1%

LawandSocietyinContemporaryJapan01 9.6% 25.0% 38.5% 26.9% 0.0% 0.0% 10.3%

MacroeconomicsA 01 10.2% 20.4% 38.8% 18.4% 11.2% 1.0% 6.7%

MacroeconomicsB 01 8.9% 22.2% 42.2% 24.4% 2.2% 0.0% 6.3%

MathematicsforPoliticalEconomy 01 45.9% 11.5% 26.2% 9.8% 3.3% 3.3% 6.2%

Notshown

Pass Fail

AY2016 Percentage of Grades

April19,2017 SchoolofPoliticalScienceandEconomics WasedaUniversity

Percentagecalculatedout ofthenumberofstudents excludingthosewhodidnot

takeexamination

Percentagecalculatedoutof thenumberofstudents Total : 100%

1/2

(2)

CourseTitle A+ A B C F G H

MicroeconomicsA 01 25.8% 15.1% 14.0% 16.1% 12.9% 16.1% 12.3%

MicroeconomicsB 01 15.2% 23.9% 26.1% 23.9% 8.7% 2.2% 8.0%

MoneyandBanking01 8.8% 12.0% 41.6% 29.6% 7.2% 0.8% 8.8%

PoliticalProcess 01 26.4% 26.4% 24.8% 16.5% 3.3% 2.5% 6.2%

PublicFinance01 8.7% 23.9% 41.3% 26.1% 0.0% 0.0% 8.0%

QuantitativeApproachforPoliticalEconomy 01 2.0% 52.0% 30.0% 10.0% 2.0% 4.0% 7.4%

SocialSecurity01 4.4% 64.4% 22.2% 2.2% 0.0% 6.7% 0.0%

Statistics(IntermediateStatistics)01 9.8% 19.6% 39.2% 31.4% 0.0% 0.0% 3.8%

TheoriesofInternationalRelations01 12.2% 24.4% 36.6% 26.8% 0.0% 0.0% 28.1%

TheoryofNPOsandNGOs01 13.3% 56.7% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.2%

TransnationalRelations01 14.9% 14.9% 34.0% 27.7% 8.5% 0.0% 6.0%

WorldLiterature 01 9.5% 21.4% 40.5% 14.3% 0.0% 14.3% 0.0%

2/2

参照

関連したドキュメント

Assume that Γ &gt; 3γ/2 and the control bound m is large enough such that the bang arc u m starting from the north pole intersects the singular arc z 0 γ/2δ, Then for the problem

Standard domino tableaux have already been considered by many authors [33], [6], [34], [8], [1], but, to the best of our knowledge, the expression of the

An example of a database state in the lextensive category of finite sets, for the EA sketch of our school data specification is provided by any database which models the

Definition 1 Given two piles, A and B, where #A ≤ #B and the number of to- kens in the respective pile is counted before the previous player’s move, then, if the previous player

We show that a discrete fixed point theorem of Eilenberg is equivalent to the restriction of the contraction principle to the class of non-Archimedean bounded metric spaces.. We

In the language of category theory, Stone’s representation theorem means that there is a duality between the category of Boolean algebras (with homomorphisms) and the category of

On the other hand, from physical arguments, it is expected that asymptotically in time the concentration approach certain values of the minimizers of the function f appearing in

Then the strongly mixed variational-hemivariational inequality SMVHVI is strongly (resp., weakly) well posed in the generalized sense if and only if the corresponding inclusion