• 検索結果がありません。

7. 1 Conclusions

The increasing development in South Sulawesi as a gate to the east of Indonesia will increase pressure to the population and economic which will bring the finding of this study to the most relevance. Due to this, land use change as one impact of exploitation of the natural resources impacted to the landslide evident. In South Sulawesi, the land use change was many cases located in the mountainous area, like in current research in upper Ujung-loe Watersheds.

Increasing the land use change in mountainous area affects the slope stability and landslide occurrence. It is also worthy to be mentioned that landslide susceptibility study is still limited in the study area as a result of many unreported landslide cases. Due to this, current research conducted assessment on the close correlation of land use change with landslide occurrence and the performance of LUC to produce landslide susceptibility using geographic information system and multivariate qualitative prediction model

The produced landslide susceptibility map is expected to be useful for government officials and urban planner in planning the development of the region. Geographic information systems are tools in disaster risk reduction planning which is one of the main issues of Indonesia's national development agenda to promote sustainable development and reduce the frequency of disasters and environmental degradation. Regarding landslide disaster risk, reduction and disaster mitigation are well approached by landslide susceptibility, hazard, and risk.

Based on the previous chapters and the subsequent discussions the following significant conclusions are presented:

1. Significant land use changes from 2004 to 2011 observed in the Ujung-Loe watershed that experienced a decline were no vegetation and dense vegetation classes, while those that have increased are medium vegetation and high vegetation classes. Landslides have

103 occurred 128 times during 2012 to 2014, and the most frequently occurred in 2013 and is mostly dominated by the one with the land use change from high vegetation to medium vegetation. The general land use change in Ujung Loe watershed indicates significant effect to landslides occurrence and slope instability.

2. Using land use change (LUC) as a new causative factor to produce landslide susceptibility map (LSM), LUC has a good effect. The result indicated that producing LSM with LUC was better than without LUC. Performances of each landslide model were tested using AUC curve for success and predictive rate, which had the highest value of predictive rate with LUC in both frequency ratio (FR) and logistic regression (LR) method (83.4% and 85,2%, respectively) and 80.24% of landslides validation fell in the class of high to very high. These results suggested that changing the vegetation to another landscape causes slopes unstable and increases the probability of landslide occurrence. LR method is better than FR to produce LSM. LUC affects landslide susceptibility in the study area; it was observed that the change in vegetation type to another landscape destabilized slopes. Validation of landslide susceptibility was carried out by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Firstly, LR shows the highest accuracy in both success and predictive rate (85.6%). Secondly, the frequency of landslides in high to a very high class of susceptibility was calculated, which indicates the level of accuracy of the method. CF returns the highest accuracy of 85.28 %.

3. Using LUC have an excellent effect to produce landslide susceptibility map. When we use FR and certainty factor (CF), LUC has the highest value on both at LUC from primary forest to open area and paddy field. In logistic regression method, LUC has the effect of landslide occurrence with significant value 0.589. Besides creating landslide susceptibility maps, this research illustrates the performance of frequency ratio (FR), certainty factor (CF) and logistic regression (LR) models as well. Two-steps of

104 validation were carried out in this study. First, performances of each landslide model were tested using AUC curve for success and predictive rate, which is more than 82 % with the highest at LR Model. In the second, the ratio of landslides falling on high to a very high class of susceptibility was obtained, which indicates the level of accuracy of the model. The CF model have highest accuracy with 85.28 % landslides fall in the range of high to very high class while in LR and FR model, it is 82.11% and 81.46%.

4. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) was the best method to produce landslide susceptibility map. The best optimization of causative factors was a combination of forward stepwise logistic regression (FSLR) - ANN with nine causative factors with AUC success rate 0.847, predictive rate 0.844 and validation with landslide fall into high and very high class with 91.30%. For this reason, this is an encouraging preliminary model towards a systematic introduction of FSLR-ANN model for optimization causative factors in landslide susceptibility assessment in the mountainous area of Ujung Loe Watershed.

7. 2 Future works

Based on the present study, further improvement could be included such as:

1. Improving the landslide inventory as the base data for landslide susceptibility assessments in the study area by using remote sensing analysis. Landslide inventory is one of the key input in landslide susceptibility mapping.

2. Further studies should also employ the high accuracy of DTM, i.e., LIDAR data to obtain better accuracy of simulation and zoning in a landslide.

105

Appendices

Appendix 1. Study area in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

106 Appendix 2. Soil map in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

107 Appendix 3. Geology map in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

108 Appendix 4. Land use/land cover in 2015 at Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

109 Appendix 5. Elevation map in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

110 Appendix 6. Slope map in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

111 Appendix 7. Map of Polygon Thiessen of Rainfall in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

112 Appendix 8. Map of Population Density in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

113 Appendix 9. Graph of Rainfall data period from 2002 to 2015 in Malino Rain Gauge Station

2509

4642

3263 3239

4218 4078

2096

3719

4729

3996

319

5474

3643 4048

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

rainfall (mm)

Year

Rainfall by Year at Malino Station

772

626

490 396

232 151 96 41 54 115

322

674

200 400 600 800 1,000

Jan Feb Mar Apr May June July August Sep Oct Nov Dec

rainfall (mm)

Month

Rainfall Monthly at Malino Station

114 Appendix 10. Graph of Rainfall data period from 2003 - 2015 in Apparang Hulu Rain Gauge Station

427

528

280

382 348 331 343 365

117

293

401

491

100 200 300 400 500 600

Jan Peb Mar Apr Mei Juni Juli Agt Sep Okt Nop Des

Rainfall (mm)

Month

Rainfall by monthly at APARANG HULU/BATUBULERANG

2242

1436

2513 2629

2227 2213

3383 3763

2976

4121

5052 4570

3310

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Rainfal (mm/year)

Year

Rainfall by Year at APARANG HULU/BATU BULERANG Station

115 Appendix 11. Graph of Rainfall data period from 2002 - 2015 in Bulo-bulo Rain Gauge Station

277 289 300

355

394 417

304

105

51

100

143

292

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Jan Peb Mar Apr Mei Juni Juli Agt Sep Okt Nop Des

Rainfall (mm/month)

Month

Rainfall by monthly at Bulo-bulo Station

2579 3123 2940

2325 2010

4251 3752

2409

5711

2717 3081

4154

3325 2237

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Rainfall (mm/year)

Year

Rainfall by Year at Bulo-bulo Station

116 Appendix 12. Map of Nine Causative Factors

117 Appendix 13. Map of Eleven Causative Factors

118 Appendix 14. Landslide susceptibility map of with and without LUC causative factors using FR, and LR method with nine

causative factor in Ujung Loe Watershed, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

119 Appendix 15. Landslide susceptibility map of with eleven causative factors using FR, CF, and LR method in Ujung Loe Watershed,

South Sulawesi, Indonesia

120 Appendix 16. Landslide susceptibility maps (LSM). (a) LSM multivariate logistic on test seventh; (b) LSM artificial neural network (ANN) with eleven

causative factor

121 Appendix 17. Landslide susceptibility maps of the best Optimized causative factor using a combination of forward stepwise (likelihood ratio)

logistic regression to eliminated causative factor and artificial neural network (FSLR-ANN) with nine causative factor

122 Appendix 18. Image of survey location

123 Appendix 19. Image of survey location

124 Appendix 20. Image of survey location

125 Appendix 21. Image of survey location